Search

Prof. Deng Xiaomang’s translations of the Critique of the Power of Judgment (2002), the Critique of Practical Reason (2003), and the Critique of Pure Reason (2004), were the first Chinese editions of Kant’s three Critiques translated in their entirety from the German originals. This interview ...

... Cohen in the Context of Modern Art: Current Issues. In: I. N. Griftsova and N. A. Dmitrieva, eds. 2010. Neokantianstvo nemezkoe i russkoe: mezhdu teoriei poznania i kritikoi kultury [German and Russian Neo-Kantianism: Between the Theory of Cognition and Critique of Culture]. Moscow: Publishing house “Political Encyclopedia” (ROSSPEN), pp. 506-520. (In Rus.) Akindinova, T. A., 2011. Image of Man in the Aesthetics of the Marburg School of Neo-Kantianism. In: A. B. Rukavishnikov, ed. 2011. Problema ...

... Philosophy, 22(4), pp. 505-528. Gomes, A., 2014. Kant on Perception: Naïve Realism, Non-Conceptualism and the B-Deduction. Philosophical Quarterly, 64(254), pp. 1-19. Griffith, A. M., 2012. Perception and the Categories: A Conceptualist Reading of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. European Journal of Philosophy, 20(2), pp. 193-222. Grüne, S., 2009. Blinde Anschauung. Die Rolle von Begriffen in Kants Theorie Sinnlicher Synthesis. Frankfurt am Mein: Klostermann. Gunther, Y. H., 2003. General Introduction....

... and “transcendental perspective” (see CPR, B25) and “transcendental constructivism” or “pragmatism” (see “acts of pure thinking" (CPR, B81)). This interpretation of transcendentalism is based on the cognitive-semantic reading of the Critique in the light of Kant’s question formulated in a letter to M. Herz (of February 21, 1772): “What is the ground of the relation of that in us which we call “representation” to the object?” (R. Hanna) and the modern interpretation of Kant ...

... “Moral Theology” is of considerable research interest, since it departs from the textbook material and presents Kant’s own ideas on the subject. This manuscript is dated winter semester 1783/84, i. e. the period between the first edition of the Critique of Pure Reason and the Critique of Practical Reason, and shortly before the publication of Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Thus, these lectures are of special important for studying the process of development of the key ideas of Kant’s ...

This paper deals with the “Table of the Categories of Freedom” in the second main chapter of Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. It provides an account of the role these categories are supposed to play and also of their conceptual content. The key to a proper understanding lies in the realisation that they are derived from the so­called table of judgements ...

... first part of the “Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic”, Kant discusses the specific status of the principles of homogeneity, specification, and continuity. In doing so, he refers to an already proven argument and thus to other passages of the Critique of Pure Reason. In search of this argument the “Transcendental Analytic” but in particular the “first book” of the “Transcendental Dialectic” turn out to be possible reference points. Although this contextualisation demands further ...

... moral law in moral education. It is no longer regarded as an affect, but is under the guidance of reason. The first part discusses the partly incompatible conceptions of enthusiasm. The second part examines Jean-François Lyotard’s interpretation and critique of Kant’s philosophical-historical theory of enthusiasm. In the face of the devastating catastrophes of the twentieth century, Lyotard sees no reason for the enthusiasm that Kant perceived in the people’s reaction to the French Revolution ...

... Gesinnung and a review of the problems of its translation into English were presented in the first part of this article; the second part examines the novel features that Kant brings to the interpretation of this concept in the critical period. In the Critique of Practical Reason these include the questions of manifestation of Gesinnung in the world, apprehended through the senses, the method of establishing and the culture of truly moral Gesinnung, as well as the problem of the immutability of Gesinnung ...

A thorough analysis of the structure of the treatise constituting the first Critique and its comparison with the analogous structure of the second and third Critiques show that the Critique of Pure Reason lacks such an important element as the antinomy of pure theoretical reason. Of course, it is implied in the text: Kant’s ...

... Journal” (2022, № 3). The notes published below continue to acquaint the reader with Shpet’s creative laboratory. His method of work with the concepts and ideas is instructive in that it enables us to raise questions about the meaning of “positive critique”, its difference from Kant’s own “critical method” and why contemporary historical-philosophical attempts to actualise Kant’s concept of critique have more to do with Shpet’s rather than Kant’s methodology. Of particular relevance ...

... making possible a moral redefinition of the subject — while point 4) addresses Christ as an example (Vorbild) — sustaining and entertaining the moral redefinition as a motivating model. Allison, H., 2001. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Engstrom, S., 2009. The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Firestone, C. L., Jacobs, N. A., 2008. In Defense of ...

Contrary to the standard view in the Kant literature, I argue that the concept of “existence” is the real focus of Kant’s investigation in the “First Moment” of the “Analytic of the Beautiful” in the Critique of the Power of Judgment. That is, “existence” is not a secondary or subordinate part of a more general discourse concerning the “disinterestedness of aesthetic judgment”. Rather, the whole characterization of the judgment of taste as ...

... reading of Kant presented in the works of H. J. Paton, P. F. Strawson, J. Bennett, and others. This approach focuses on the problem of the possibility of experience, with its main source being Kant’s argument for causality in the Second Analogy from the Critique of Pure Reason. As a consequence of its polemic, this approach, as formulated by Bennett, treats the problem of the conditions of the possibility of experience as the problem of imposing a causal order on nature. Based on the results of my analysis,...

... paradoxes of formal theories of logical consequence stem from the loss of grounding by the transcendental system of logic in the post­Kantian logical tradition. Arguably, analysis of logical terminology of consequence in Kant’s seminal works — Critique of Pure Reason, Critique of the Power of Judgment — in comparison with the terminology of earlier works, Prolegomena and lectures on logic attributed to him will clarify the question of the relation oflogical consequence in the formal and non­formal ...

... Chalmers, D., 2015. Soznayushchiy um: V poiskakh fundamental’noy teorii [The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory]. Moscow: Librokom. (In Rus.) Crenshaw, K., 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Anti­dis­crimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Anti­racist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum: Journal, 1, pp. 139-167. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500480-5 . Dennett, D., 1991. Consciousness Explained. Edited by A. Lane....

... nature’s impact on humans and their connection to other living beings. Constructing a dialogue between Kant and Schaeffer helps to solve two problems. First, to determine whether Kant’s ethical and teleological concept is immune to Schaeffer’s critique. Second, to clarify the German philosopher’s contribution to environmental ethics. I come to the conclusion that it is premature to claim that consciousness and free will exist only in the framework of their being conditioned by nature. I also ...

The hypothetical approach to the supersensible developed by Kant in his three Critiques, exemplified by his analysis of the aesthetic and reflective judgment in his third Critique, with their principle fortuitous purposiveness, can be considered as the basis for a new foundation of metaphysics. According to Kant’s limitation ...

... 134-155. Allison, H. E., 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Atwell, J. E., 1986. Ends and Principles in Kant’s Moral Thought. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Beck, L. W., 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Bittner, R., 2001. Doing Things for Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brewer, T., 2002. Maxims and Virtues. The Philosophical Review, 111(4), pp. 539-572. Bubner, R., 2000....

The study of the “first wave” of reactions to the Critique of Pure Reason in Germany from the second half of the 1780s until the beginning of the nineteenth century reveals the paradoxical status of the Kantian transcendental subject. While the existence of the transcendental subject, whatever the term ...

... interpretations. In the course of the argument I discuss Kant’s concepts of autonomy and heteronomy showing how they refer to will and to ethics. Then I describe a group of interpretations which portray Spinoza’s moral theory as heteronomous. My critique begins by presenting some textual evidence which vividly contradicts some of the boldest heteronomous renditions of Spinoza’s ethics. Then I move on to argue for the existence of conditions in Spinoza’s thought that make every heteronomous ...

Against the background of a dispute with K. Jaspers, this article considers the Critique of Pure Reason as a system of epistemology and an overview of Kant’s philosophical system. The central thesis is the statement that Kant’s epistemology is based on transcendental anthropology connected with the history of philosophy. It is ...

....2015). 24. Шпет Г. Г. Кант И. Критика чистого разума. СПб., 1902. 25. Шпет Г. Г. Кант И. Критика чистого разума / пер. Н. О. Лосского. СПб., 1907 I. Kant, N. O. Lossky, Critique of Pure Reason, translation, intuitivism, A. I. Vvedеnsky, intuition, logic, synthetic judgement, knowledge Popova V. S. 62-75 10.5922/0207-6918-2015-2-4 [html]1. Avtonomova, N. S., 2008, Poznanie I perevod. Opyty filosofii yazyka [Knowledge ...

... London: Yale University Press, Revised and Enlarged Edition. 11. Barker, S. F. 1967, Appearing and appearances in Kant, The Monist, vol. 51, n. 3, Kant Today: Part I (1967), pp. 426—441. 12. Baum, M. 2001, Objects and Objectivity in Kant’s First Critique, in: Kant’s Idealism: New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine (ed. by D. Schulting & J. Verburgt), Dordrecht : Spinger, p. 55—70. 13. Bird, G. 1962 (1974), Kant’s Theory of Knowledge: An Outline of One Central Argument in the Critique ...

Against the background of a dispute with K. Jaspers, this article considers the Critique of Pure Reason as a system of epistemology and an overview of Kant’s philosophical system. The cen-tral thesis is the statement that Kant’s epistemology is based on transcendental anthropology con-nected with the history of philosophy. It ...

... the system and its functions Kalinnikov L. 7-18 10.5922/0207-6918-2014-3-1 [text]1. Kalinnikov, L. A.1989, Interpretatsiya i printsipyi [Interpretation and principles], Kantovskiy sbornik. no.14.2. Kant, I. 1965, Kritika practicheskogo razuma [Critique of Practical Reason] in Kant, I. Sobranie sochineniy v 6 tomah [Collected works in 6 volumes], Moscow, t. 5.3. Kant, I. 2006, Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of Pure Reason], in Kant, I. Sochineniya na nemetskom i russkom yazyikah [Collected ...

... J. Jungius’s “criticism” is characterised as methodological, whereas that of Kant as reflective. Kant’s “transcendental criticism” is based on transcendental reflection, whereas J. Jungius’s “methodological criticism” requires that critique is grounded in immediate rather than reflective knowledge. Kant is a subjectivist, whereas J. Jungius is an objectivist and realist. For J. Jungius, the basic science is protonoetic philosophy (philosophia protonoetica), whose major task is to ...

... that word should be considered adequate. Second, this approach leads to the creation of ever new philosophical languages which simultaneously challenge the tradition and yet claim to be a renewed version of it. It is shown that the fairly systematic critique of the Kant­ian approach by Johann Georg Hamann and Johann Gottfried Herder falls short of proposing an alternative philosophical system because, having a religious foundation, it does not offer a complete grounding of knowledge. In the wide ...

... deduction, which is universally considered one of the most difficult chapters in the history of philosophy, reveals itself as the genuine clarification of specifically philosophical proof. I first present the idea of Kant’s transcendental deduction in the Critique of Pure Reason as well as its Hegelian reading in the Science of Logic and reformulation as the very method of philosophy in the Philo­sophy of Right. I show what in the Kantian argumentation constituted the basis for Hegel’s own interpretation ...

The positions of Christian Wolff and Im­manuel Kant on the possibility of proving the existence of God require some examination. Wolff’s critique of the physical-theological proof and his proposed ways of improving it are here analysed. God is central to Wolff’s philosophical system and the fundamental prerequisite of his theoretical and practical philosophy. Although Wolff insists that ...

... theology. Four intellectual backgrounds of objections are examined: an Aristotelian and Thomistic teleological order of nature (1); Augustinianism based on original sin in which human agency is completely attributed to God’s grace (2); a Hegelian critique of the deontological conception of an “unconditional ought” which also puts Kant’s postulate of the existence of God into question (3); the combination in Radical Orthodoxy of a postmodern critique of the subject, an Augustinian view of ...

Transcendental philosophy was not born like Athena out of Zeus’s head, mature and in full armour from the very beginning. That is why in both prefaces to the Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and 1787) Kant introduces the concept of transcendental philosophy as an “idea.” The idea understood architectonically develops slowly and only gradually acquires a definite form. As witnessed by the works of Kant himself ...

... preface and notes by D. Macdonald. Berkeley & Los Angeles & London: University of California Press. [Huber, L. F.], 1796. Projet de paix perpétuelle, par Kant. In: Gazette nationale ou le Moniteur universel, 103 (3 January), pp. 410-411. Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Klopstock, F. G., 1982. Werke und Briefe. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe. Werke 1: Epigramme. Herausgegeben von K. Hurlebusch. Berlin: De Gruyter....

... Historical-Critical Introduction. In: H. E. Allison, ed. 1973. The Kant-Eberhard Controversy; An English translation together with supplementary materials and a historical-analytic introduction of Immanuel Kant’s: On a Discovery According to which any new Critique of Pure Reason has been Made Superfluous by an Earlier. Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 1-104. Allison, H. E., 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. 2nd ed. New Haven, London: Yale University ...

... Kant’s formulation of the key tasks of transcendental philosophy. The prime task is to discover the categories of understanding and to prove the legitimacy of their use, a task that is further complicated by the difference between the editions of the Critique of Pure Reason in terms of the argumentation in the section on the deduction of categories and Kant’s concept of apperception. Accordingly, the author seeks to clarify the purpose of each of the above-mentioned faculties and to establish their ...

Kant was never satisfied with the version of his “Refutation” published in 1787 (KrV, B 275-279). His dissatisfaction is already evident in the footnote added to the preface of the second edition of the Critique in 1787. As a matter of fact, Kant continued to rework his argument for at least six years after 1787. The main exegetical problem is to figure out who is the target of the “Refutation”: a non-sceptic idealist or a global sceptic of Cartesian ...

.... A History of Russian Philosophy 1830—1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-23. Herzen, A. I., 1979. From the Other Shore & The Russian People and Socialism. Translated by M. Budberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kant, I., 1996a. Critique of Practical Reason. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by M. J. Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139-271. Kant, I., 1996b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy....

The article introduces Kant’s doctrine of schematism (Critique of Pure Reason A 137-A 147; B 176-B 187). The inclusion of the chapter on schematism in the ‘Doctrine of the Principles’ rather than the ‘Doctrine of Concepts’ is taken as a clue to distinguishing the Doctrine of Schematism from the Deduction ...

... pre- Kantian philosophy (naïve realism), or appearance with representation, which was the case in phenomenalist interpretations of transcendentalism à la Berkley (interpretation of two objects). Kant’s appearance, as emphasised in BXXVII of his Critique, is an appearance of an object (thing-initself), which — although implicitly — suggests a semantic relationship of reference. Appearance (as a sign) is impossible without what appears in it (the referent of a sign). This article puts forward ...

... Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann. 5. Heidegger M. 1997. Hegels «Phänomenologie des Geistes». In: Heidegger M. GA, Bd. 32. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann. 6. Hinske N. 2007. Mezhdu Prosveshcheniem i kritikoj razuma [Between Enlightment and Critique of Reason]. M., Kul'turnaja revoljutsija. 7. Husserl E. 1950. Vorlesungen über Ethik und Wertlehre 1908—1914. In: Hua XXVIII. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 8. Husserl E. 1962. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften ...

This article considers H.-G. Gadamer’s hermeneutics in the context of Kant’s aesthetic theory laid down in the Critique of Judgement. Kant facilitated the development of aesthetics as an independent science, for the first time addressing the problem of the cognising and perceiving subject. Gadamer, a prominent 20th century philosopher, builds his aesthetic concept ...

... works on the history of materialism and philosophical-sociological texts on literary classics) and her epistolary legacy (most notably her correspondence with Plekhanov) show that, for her, rethinking the ideas of Kant was a reference point in the “critique of criticism” directed at the epistemological reasoning of Neo-Kantians, on the one hand, and at the Russian thinkers who had embraced “idealism” on the other. This was essentially the approach adopted by scholars at the Historical Materialism ...

... to the concept of moral sense. First I look at the works of the pre-critical period in which this concept is used and conclude that Kant may have borrowed the concept from Hutcheson. At the same time Kant makes this concept an object of his immanent critique because already now the question arises of the nature and character of virtue and the possibility of its being estimated impartially. Next I turn to Kant’s works of the critical period in which he is more emphatic in claiming that the moral ...

... Aristotle, 1957. On the Soul. In: Aristotle, 1957. On the Soul. Parva Naturalia. On Breath. Translated by W. S. Hett. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, pp. 2-203. Cooper, A., 2016. Nature’s Ultimate End: Hope and Culture in Kant’s Third Critique. Philosophica, 48(1), pp. 31-45. Denis, L., 2000. Kant’s Conception of Duties Regarding Animals: Reconstruction and Reconsideration. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 405-423. Dyadkovsky, I. E., 1836. Obshchaya terapiya, sochinennaya ...

... the First World War. Prepodavatel XXI vek, 2/1, pp. 46-61. (In Rus.) Ern, V. F., 1910. Berkeley as the Founder of Modern Immanentism. Voprosy filosofii i psihologii [Issues of Philosophy and Psychology], 103, pp. 413-436. (In Rus.) Ern, V. F., 1912. Critique of the Kantian Concept of Truth. In: Filosofskij sbornik. L’vu Mihajlovichu Lopa­tinu k tridcatiletiyu nauchno-pedagogicheskoj deyatel’nosti. Ot Moskovskogo psihologicheskogo obshchestva. 1881-1911 [Philosophical Collection. To Lev Mikhailovich ...

... Cambridge University Press, pp. 365-603. Kant, I., 1996b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785). ln: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43-108. Kant, I. 1996c. Critique of Practical Reason (1788). In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139-271. Kant, I., 2010. Naturrecht Feyerabend. Abhandlung. Neue, anhand des Manuskriptes revidierte ...

... deutsch-russische Ausgabe. Edited by N. Motroschilova and B. Tuschling. Volume 1: Treatises and Articles (1764—1796). Moscow: Kami. Kant, I., 2001. Werke. Zweisprachige deutsch-russische Ausgabe. Ed. by N. Motroschilova and B. Tuschling. Volume 4: Critique of Judgment. First Introduction to the Critique of Judgment. Edited by N. Motroshilova, T. Dlugach, B. Tuschling and U. Vogel. Мoscow: Nauka. Kant, I., 2006. Werke. Zweisprachige deutsch-russische Ausgabe. Ed. by N. Motroschilova and B. Tuschling....

... Faculties (1963), in which the French philosopher aims to find the potential limits of interpretation of Kant’s philosophy. Deleuze appeals to Kant’s study of faculties, in which he finds contradictions and “gaps” that find their solution in the Critique of Judgment. Deleuze refers to the free coherence of the faculties as to “something third”, which gives options for reactualising Kant’s philosophy without striving to overcome it. I also provide a brief history of the issues related to ...

... Kudryavtsev was not only thoroughly familiar with the Königsberg thinker’s work, but offered a critically reinterpreted version of Kant’s teaching on space, time and categories of understanding. But was the Russian philosopher original in his reading and critique of Kant? In his later works Kudryavtsev often cites the works of Friedrich Adolf Trendelenburg whose works turn out to be very close to the Russian philosopher. Could it be that Kudryavtsev read Kant through Trendelenburg’s optics? To answer ...

... Philosophy. Edited and translated by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 353-603. Kant, I., 1998a. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kant, I., 1998b. The Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kant, I., 2007. Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. Translated by A. Wood. In: I. Kant, 2007. Anthropology, History and Education....