2024 Vol. 43. №2

Peculiarities of Kant’s Interpretation of the Term ‘Consequence’

DOI

10.5922/0207-6918-2024-2-2

Pages

50-78

Abstract

Modern formal logic, which is based on Kant’s logical project, interprets logical consequence as formal, which leads to substantive paradoxes that combine any thoughts at all and so to the loss of consequence as such. Beginning with A. Tarski, modern history of logic brings the problem of logical consequence into the realmof search for the relation of consequence, or grounding. In his doctoral dissertation on the nature of logical formality J. MacFarlane claims that the paradoxes of formal theories of logical consequence stem from the loss of grounding by the transcendental system of logic in the post­Kantian logical tradition. Arguably, analysis of logical terminology of consequence in Kant’s seminal works — Critique of Pure Reason, Critique of the Power of Judgment — in comparison with the terminology of earlier works, Prolegomena and lectures on logic attributed to him will clarify the question of the relation oflogical consequence in the  formal and non­formal sense. The key concept of consequence in Kant’s terminology is Folgerung, which denotes ‘following’ in logical and non­logical contexts. I have also analysed related concepts: Folge, Abfolge, folglich etc., established dif- ferences between logical terms with similar meaning ‘inference’ (Schluss) and ‘conclusion’ (Konklusion). Finally, I make an attempt to formulate the problem of logical consequence in formal logic through the logical terms Schlussfolge, Folgerung and Konsequenz. On the strength of my analysis I propose to consider Kant’s consequence (Folgerung) to be a concept of transcendental logic that reflects the relation of consequence and grounds formal consequence.

Reference

Achourioti, T. and van Lambalgen, M., 2011. A Formalization of Kant’s Transcendental Logic. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 4(2), pp. 254-289.

Achourioti, T. and van Lambalgen, M., 2017. Kant’s Logic Revisited. Journal of Applied Logics — IfCoLog Journal, 4(4), pp. 845-865.

Asmus, C. and Restall, G., 2012. History of Logical Consequence. In: D. Gabbay, F. J. Pelletier, J. Woods, eds. 2012. Logic: A History of Its Central Concepts, Volume 11. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Boghossian, P., 2016. Intuitions and the Understanding. In: M. Á. Fernández Vargas, ed. 2016. Performance Epistemology: Foundations and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 137-150.

Bolzano, B., 2022. Theory of Science: Attempt at a Detailed and in the Main Novel Exposition of Logic with Constant Attention to Earlier Authors. Edited by R. George. Oakland: University of California Press.

Dragalina-Chernaya, E., 2020. Material Consequence and Formal Grounding. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 57, pp. 79-95. (In Rus.)

Etchemendy, J., 1990. The Concept of Logical Consequence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Evans, R., Sergot, M. and Stephenson, A., 2019. Formalizing Kant’s Rules. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48, pp. 1-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09531-x.

Kant, I., 1992a. The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770. Translated by D. Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85-106.

Kant, I., 1992b. The Jäsche Logic. In: I. Kant, 1992. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 521-630.

Kant, I., 1992c. The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770. Translated by D. Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-202.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by P. Guyer. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2002a. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. Translated by G. C. Hatfield. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by H. Allison, P. Heath New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-170.

Kant, I., 2002b. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by W. S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

Kant, I., 2022. Venskaya logika [The Vienna Logic]. Translated (into Russian) by A. M. Kharitonova and L. E. Kryshtop, edited by A. N. Krouglov. Moscow: Kanon+. (In Rus.)

Kharitonova, A. M., 2022. The Doctrine of Reason by G. F. Mayer. In: I. Kant, 2022. Venskaja logika [The Vienna Logic]. Translated (into Russian) by A. M. Kharitonova and L. E. Kryshtop, edited by A. N. Krouglov. Moscow: Canon+, 2022, pp. 83-86. (In Rus.)

Kovač, S., 2020. Logical Foundations and Kant’s Principles of Formal Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic, 41(1), pp. 48-70.

Krouglov, A. N., 2022. “German Logic” by Christian Wolff. In: I. Kant, 2022. The Vienna Logic. Moscow:
Canon+, pp. 30-48. (In Rus.)

Krouglov, A. N., 2023. Figurative, Symbolic and Contemplative Cognition. Part II: From Chr. A. Crusius to I. Kant. History of Philosophy. 28(1), pp. 18-28. (In Rus.)

Ludovici, C. G., 1737. Ausführliche Entwurff einer vollständigen Historie der Wolffischen Philosophie, zum Gebrauch seiner Zuhörer. Volume 2. Leipzig: Johann Georg Löwe.

MacFarlane, J. G., 2000. What Does It Mean to Say That Logic is Formal? Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

Peirce, C. S., 1992. Reasoning and the Logic of Things: The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898. Edited by K. L. Ketner, Introduction by K. L. Ketner and H. Putnam. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard University Press.

Poggiolesi, F., 2016. On Defining the Notion of Complete and Immediate Formal Grounding. Synthese, 193(10), pp. 3147-3167.

Read, S., 1994. Thinking About Logic: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rumberg, A., 2013. Bolzano’s Concept of Grounding against the Background of Normal Proofs. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 6(3), pp. 424-459.

Tarski, A., 1936. Über den Begriff der logischen Folgerung. In: Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique. Sorbonne, Paris 1935. Volume 7. Paris: Hermann & Cie, pp. 1-11.

Tarski, A., 1956. On the Concept of Logical Consequence. In: A. Tarski, 1956. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Translated by J. H. Woodger. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 409-420.

Tatzel, A., 2002. Bolzano’s Theory of Ground and Consequence. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 43, pp. 1-25.