The systemacity of CPR and Kant’s system (I)
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2015-3-1
- Pages
- 7-21
Abstract
Against the background of a dispute with K. Jaspers, this article considers the Critique of Pure Reason as a system of epistemology and an overview of Kant’s philosophical system. The cen-tral thesis is the statement that Kant’s epistemology is based on transcendental anthropology con-nected with the history of philosophy. It is proven that, in terms of its content, the formal dual divi-sion of the Critique is a triad system comprising a number of similar subsystems.
Reference
1. Abramjan, L. A. 1981, Glavnyj trud Kanta [The main work of Kant], Erevan.
2. Jaspers, K. 2014, Kant: zhizn', trudy, vlijanie. [Kant], M.,2014.
3. Kant, I. 1963, Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of Pure Reason], in Kant, I. Sobr. soch. v 6 t., Moscow, T. 3.
4. Kant, I. 1965, Kritika sposobnosti suzhdenija [Critique of Judgment], in Kant, I. Sobr. soch. v 6 t., Moscow, T. 5.
5. Kant, I. 2000, Iz rukopisnogo naslediya [materialyi k «Kritike chistogo razuma»] [From the manuscript heritage [materials to "Critique of Pure Reason»]], Moscow.
6. Cassirer, E. 2004, Filosofiya Prosveshcheniya [The Philosophy of the Enlightenment], Moscow.
7. Pushkin, A. S. 2001, Materialy k «Otryvkam iz pisem, mysljam i zamechanijam» [Materials to the "Excerpts from letters, thoughts and remarks"], in Pushkin, A.S Polnoe sobranie sochinenij v 1 t. [Complete Works in 1 vol.], Moscow.
8. Pushkin, A. S. 2001, Vozrazhenie na stat'ju Kjuhel'bekera «O napravlenii nashej po-jezii» [Objection on Kuchelbecker's article "On the direction of our poetry"], in Pushkin, A.S Polnoe sobranie sochinenij v 1 t. [Complete Works in 1 vol.], Moscow.
9. De Boer, K. 2014, Kant’s Multi-Layered Conception of Things in Themselves, Transcen-dental Objects, and Monads, Kant-Studien 105 (2), p 221—260.
10. Livingston D. W. 1984, Hume’s Philosophy of Common Life. Chicago and London.