Spontaneities and Singularities: Kant’s Hypothetical Approach to the Supersensible and the Re-Foundation of Metaphysics
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2021-4-4
- Pages
- 76-120
Abstract
The hypothetical approach to the supersensible developed by Kant in his three Critiques, exemplified by his analysis of the aesthetic and reflective judgment in his third Critique, with their principle fortuitous purposiveness, can be considered as the basis for a new foundation of metaphysics. According to Kant’s limitation of cognition to the realm of sense intuition, theoretical knowledge of God, the subject, things-in-themselves, transcendental ideas is impossible. This leads to a kind of “negative theology” of the highest principle and the supersensible as a whole. The reasons are rooted in the character of propositional thought, which can only circumscribe a singular, supersensible reality by means of predicative sentences and discursive thought. Taking Kant’s lead, but in contrast to his terminology, I call really existent singularities, including the thinking, knowing, desiring, feeling unique individuals we know as human beings, spontaneities, in order to distinguish them from descriptive characteristics attributed to them by predicative thought. Kant’s “practico-dogmatic” account of the postulates of God and immortality of the soul, based on the “fact of freedom” and its connection to the moral imperative, ensure the possibility of the “highest good” as final aim of moral behaviour — but cannot satisfy our need for knowledge of the supersensible. To “lay the groundwork” for experience of our own self-conscious reality, the reality of others like ourselves, of things which transcend the boundaries of sense intuition, and of true reciprocity, a different method is needed, one which leads us “beyond being and thought” to the unconditional beginning of conditional reality.
Reference
Allison, H., 2002. Editor’s Introduction. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by H. Allison and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 339-347.
Allison, H. and Heath, P., 2002. General Introduction. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by H. Allison and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-27.
Düsing, K., 2010. Kritik der Theologie und Gottesfrage bei Kant. In: N. Fischer und M. Forschner, Hg. 2010. Die Gottesfrage in der Philosophie Immanuel Kants. Freiburg, Basel and Wien: Herder, pp. 57-71.
Guyer, P., 1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F., 1970. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Kant, I., 1987. Critique of Judgment. Translated with Introduction by W. Pluhar. Foreword by M. J. Gregor. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett.
Kant, I., 1996a. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by W. Pluhar, Introduction by P. W. Kitcher. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Kant, I. 1996b. Religion within the Bounds of Mere Reason. In: I. Kant, 1996. Religion and Rational Philosophy. Translated and edited by A. Wood, G. Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39-215.
Kant, I., 1996c. On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, but It is of No Use in Practice. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor, with Introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 277-309.
Kant, I., 2002a. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by W. Pluhar, Introduction by S. Engstrom. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett.
Kant, I., 2002b. What Real Progress Has Metaphysics Made in Germany since the Time of Leibniz and Wolff? (1793/1804). In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by H. Allison and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337-424.
Kant, I., 2005. Notes and Fragments. Edited by P. Guyer, translated by C. Bowman, P. Guyer and F. Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I., 2011. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. A German-English Edition. Translated by M. Gregor, edited by J. Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langthaler, R., 2010. Zur Gottesthematik in der ‘Preisschrift’ über die wirklichen Fortschritte in der Metaphysik. Das Gefüge der Ideen des “Übersinnlichen in uns, über uns, und nach uns”. In: N. Fischer and M. Forschner, eds. 2010. Die Gottesfrage in der Philosophie Immanuel Kants. Freiburg, Basel & Wien: Herder, pp. 155-179.
Plato. 1927. First Alcibiades. In: Plato with an English Translation: in Twelve Volumes. Volume 8. Translated by W. R. M. Lamb. London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, pp. 93-224.
Plato, 2017. Phaedo. In: Plato. Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Edited and translated by C. Emlyn-Jones and W. Preddy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 292-405.
Recki, B., 2001. Aesthetik der Sitten. Die Affinität von ästhetischem Gefühl und praktischer Vernunft bei Kant. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
Schueller, H. M., 1955. Immanuel Kant and the Aesthetics of Music. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 14(2), pp. 218-247.
Spinoza, B., 1985. The Complete Works of Spinoza. Volume I. Edited by E. Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vossenkuhl, W., 1994. Spontaneität. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 48(3), pp. 329-349.
Zovko, M.-É. 2013. Involved in Humankind: Nature, Virtue and the Good We Desire for Ourselves and for Others. Knowledge Cultures, 1/2, pp. 264-300.
Zovko, M.-É. 2014. Impassioned by Passion: Knowledge and Love in Plato and Spinoza. Dionysius, 32, pp. 140-171.
Zovko, M.-É., 2018. Poetry and Play in Kant’s Critique of Judgment. In: V. L. Waibel and M. Ruffing, eds. 2018. Akten des 12. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses „Natur und Freiheit“ in Wien, 21.-25. September 2015. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 3159-3166.