2021 Vol. 40. №3

Transcendental Philosophy as a Scientific Research Programme

DOI

10.5922/0207-6918-2021-3-4

Pages

93-126

Abstract

Transcendental philosophy was not born like Athena out of Zeus’s head, mature and in full armour from the very beginning. That is why in both prefaces to the Critique of Pure Reason (1781 and 1787) Kant introduces the concept of transcendental philosophy as an “idea.” The idea understood architectonically develops slowly and only gradually acquires a definite form. As witnessed by the works of Kant himself and of his predecessors and followers, the idea of transcendental philosophy has undergone a series of changes and adjustments compared to the initial plan. In this context, my goal is not simply exegesis and historical investigation of transcendental philosophy, but also to look at it from a systematic and methodological perspective. I examine the concept of transcendental philosophy from the viewpoint of programmatic metaphilosophy. The first part discusses programmatics as a distinct subsection of metaphilosophy. I argue that Kant’s architectonic methodology and the methodology of Lakatos can be used to understand the inception, development and degradation of philosophical systems. In the second part I look at the project of transcendental philosophy and the stages of its development from the standpoint of architectonics. The third part shows that Lakatos’s methodology can provide a detailed insight into the elements of transcendental philosophy, a clear idea of its logic and identify the component parts that can be improved and developed. In spite of the different levels of detailing and epistemological prerequisites, the methodologies of Kant and Lakatos can be combined to achieve a metaphilosophically informed and progressive understanding of philosophical projects.

Reference

Apel, K.-O., 2011. Paradigmen der ersten Philosophie. Zur reflexiven — transzendentalpragmatischen — Rekonstruktion der Philosophiegeschichte. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Backhouse, R. E., 1998. Explorations in Economic Methodology. From Lakatos to Empirical Philosophy of Science. London & New York: Routledge.

Black, S., 2003. Imre Lakatos and Literary Tradition. Philosophy and Literature, 27(2), 363-381.

Ficara, E., 2006. Die Ontologie in der „Kritik der reinen Vernunft“. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

Fichte, J. G., 1982. Second Introduction to the Science of Knowledge, for Readers who Already Have a Philosophical System. In: J. G. Fichte, 1982. Science of Knowledge with the First and Second Introductions. Edited and translated by P. Heath and J. Lachs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-88.

Förster, E., 2015. Transzendentalphilosophie. In: M. Willaschek, J. Stolzenberg, G. Mohr, S. Bacin ed., 2015. Kant-Lexikon. Berlin; Boston: de Gruyter, pp. 2319-2325.

Fulda, H. F., 1988. Ontologie nach Kant und Hegel. In: D. Henrich ed., 1988. Metaphysik nach Kant? Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongress 1987. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 44-82.

Gakis, D., 2016. Philosophy as Paradigms: An Account of a Contextual Metaphilosophical Perspective. Philosophical Papers, 45(1-2), pp. 209-239,

Geldsetzer, L., 1989. Philosophie der Philosophie. In: J. Ritter, K. Gründer, G. Gabriel ed., 1998. Histo­risches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Bd. 7. Basel: Schwabe Verlag, pp. 904-911.

Habermas, J., 2016. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne, 12. Auflage, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch.

Henrich, D., 1991. Konstellationen. Probleme und Debatten am Ursprung der idealistischen Philosophie (1789—1795). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Hinske, N., 1998. Transzendental — 18. Jahrhundert. In: J. Ritter, K. Gründer, G. Gabriel ed., 1998. Histo­risches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Bd. 10. Basel: Schwabe Verlag, pp. 1376-1388.

Hinske, N., 1970. Kants Weg zur Transzendentalphilosophie. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.

Kant, I., 1992a. The Employment in Natural Philosophy of Metaphysics Combined with Geometry, of Which Sample I Contains the Physical Monadology. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical philosophy, I755-1770. Translated and edited by D. Walford in collaboration with R. Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47-66.

Kant, I., 1992b. The Jäsche Logic. In: I. Kant, 1992. Lectures on Logic. Translated by J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 521-640.

Kant, I., 1993. Opus Postumum. Edited by E. Förster, translated by E. Förster and M. Rosen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 1996a. Critique of Practical Reason. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133-272.

Kant, I., 1996b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37-109.

Kant, I., 1997. Metaphysik Mrongovius. In: I. Kant, 1997. Lectures on Metaphysics. Edited and translated by K. Ameriks and S. Naragon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109-288.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 1999. Declaration Concerning Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre. In: I. Kant, 1999. Correspondence. Translated by A. Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 559-560.

Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgement. Translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Edited by P. Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2002. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by H. Allison and P. Heath, translated by G. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49-169.

Kant, I., 2007. Lectures on Pedagogy. In: Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by G. Zöller and R. B. Louden, translated by R. B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 434-485.

Katrechko, S. L., 2020. Kantian “Idea [Project] of Transcendental Philosophy”. Transcendental Journal, 1, [online] Available at: <https://transcendental.ru/S123456780008967-4-1&gt; [Accessed 02 February 2021]. (In Rus.)

Lakatos, I., 1968. Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 69, pp. 149-186.

Lakatos, I., 1978a. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: I. Lakatos, 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers. Volume 1. Edited by J. Warall and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 8-101.

Lakatos, I., 1978b. History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions. In: I. Lakatos, 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers. Volume 1. Edited by J. Warall and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102-138.

Lakatos, I., 1978c. Popper on Demarcation and Induction. In: I. Lakatos, 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers. Volume 1. Edited by J. Warall and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139-167.

Lazerowitz, M., 1970. A Note on “Metaphilosophy”. Metaphilosophy, 1, p. 91.

Lazerowitz, M., 1964. Studies in Metaphilosophy. New York: Humanities Press.

Lewin, M., 2020. The Universe of Science. The Architectonic Ideas of Science, Sciences, and Their Parts in Kant. Kantian Journal, 39(2), pp. 26-45.

Lewin, M., 2021. Das System der Ideen. Zur perspektivistisch-metaphilosophischen Begründung der Vernunft im Anschluss an Kant und Fichte. Freiburg & München: Alber.

Murphy, N., 1999. Theology and Science within a Lakatosian Program. Zygon, 34(4), pp. 629-642.

Nagel, E., 1954. Sovereign Reason and Other Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Glencoe: The Free Press.

Oizerman, T. I., 2014. Metaphilosophy; The Ambiva­lence of Philosophy. In: T. I. Oizerman, 2014. Izbrannye trudi v 5 tomakh [Chosen Works in 5 Volumes]. Volume 5. Moscow: Nauka.

Overgaard, S., Gilbert, P., Burwood, S., 2013. An Introduction to Metaphilosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Raatzsch, R., 2014. Philosophiephilosophie. 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Springer.

Reinhold, K. L., 1803. Beyträge zur leichtern Übersicht des Zustandes der Philosophie sbeym Anfange des 19. Jahrhunderts. Hamburg: Friedrich Perthes,. Bd. 6.

Reinhold, K. L., 2003. Beiträge zur Berichtigung bisheriger Missverständnisse der Philosophen. Band 1. Herausgegeben von F. Fabbianelli. Hamburg: Meiner, 2003.

Rescher, N., 2014. Metaphilosophy: Philosophy in Philosophical Perspective. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Rescher, N., 2006. Philosophical Dialectics. An Essay on Metaphilosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.

Rivero, G., 2014. Zur Bedeutung des Begriffs Ontologie bei Kant. Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, 2014.

Schnädelbach, H., 1994. Philosophie. In: E. Martens, H. Schnädelbach, eds. 1994. Philosophie. Ein Grundkurs. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch, pp. 37-76.

Sturm, T., 2009. Kant und die Wissenschaften vom Menschen. Paderborn: mentis.

Theunissen, B., 2014. Hegels Phänomenologie als metaphilosophische Theorie. Hegel und das Problem der Vielfalt der philosophischen Theorien. Eine Studie zur systemexternen Rechtfertigungsfunktion der Phänomenologie des Geistes. Hamburg: Meiner.

Vasilyev, V. V., 2019. Metaphilosophy: History and Perspectives. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 56(2), pp. 6-18. (In Rus.)

Williamson, T., 2008. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Malden, MA & Oxford & Carlton, Victoria: Wiley-Blackwell.