The Transcendental Deduction of Categories as Philosophical Proof
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2023-3-4
- Pages
- 74-96
Abstract
My aim is to reconstruct the basic steps and the fundamental idea of Kant’s transcendental deduction of categories as well as Hegel’s interpretation and reframing of Kant’s idea. Hegel’s reading is crucial for two reasons: first, for fixing the basic form of the Kantian argument and secondly, for understanding its metaphilosophical relevance. For Hegel, philosophical proof has a specific nature, which distinguishes it from scientific proof and brings it closer to a juridical one. In this perspective the transcendental deduction, which is universally considered one of the most difficult chapters in the history of philosophy, reveals itself as the genuine clarification of specifically philosophical proof. I first present the idea of Kant’s transcendental deduction in the Critique of Pure Reason as well as its Hegelian reading in the Science of Logic and reformulation as the very method of philosophy in the Philosophy of Right. I show what in the Kantian argumentation constituted the basis for Hegel’s own interpretation and transformation. In so doing, I highlight a ‘red thread’ between the two ideas of the transcendental deduction. I conclude by proposing a formal account of Kant’s and Hegel’s ideas and by summing up the main metaphilosophical insights we can gain from Kant’s idea and its Hegelian interpretation.
Reference
Allais, L., 2013. Kitcher on the Deduction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 87(1), pp. 229-236.
Allison, H., 2015. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bauer, S. M., 2021. Der Wahrheitsbegriff in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
Baum, M., 1986. Deduktion und Beweis in Kants Transzendentalphilosophie. Untersuchungen zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Königstein: Hain.Chiodi, P., 1961. La deduzione nell’opera di Kant. Torino: Taylor.
De Vleeschauwer, H. J., 1934-1937. La déduction transcendentale dans l’œuvre de Kant. In 3 Volumes. Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff.
Düsing, K., 2013. Subjektivität und Freiheit: Untersuchungen zum Idealismus von Kant bis Hegel. Second Edition. Stuttgart Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann Holzboog.
Erdmann, B., 1878. Kants Kritizismus in der ersten und zweiten Auflage der ‘Kritik der reinen Vernunft’. Leipzig: Voss.
Ferrari, M., 2013. Book Review of Kant’s Transcendental Arguments. Disciplining Pure Reason, by Scott Stapleford (2008). Kant-Studien, 104(2), pp. 254-256.
Ficara, E., 2006. Die Ontologie in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Ficara, E., 2021. The Form of Truth. Hegel’s Philosophical Logic. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
Ficara, E., ed. 2012. Skeptizismus und Philosophie. Kant, Fichte, Hegel. Sonderausgabe von Fichte-Studien, Vol. 39. Leiden: Rodopi.
Ficara, E., 2013. Kant e il rapporto dello scetticismo con la filosofia. In: S. Bacin, A. Ferrarin, C. La Rocca, M. Ruffing, eds. Akten des XI. Kant Kongresses. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, pp. 543-555.
Forster, M., 2008. Kant and Skepticism. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Forster, M., 2021. Skepticism. In: J. Wuerth, ed. 2021. The Cambridge Kant Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 404-407.
Gadamer, H. -G., 1971. Die Idee der Hegelschen Logik. In: H.-G. Gadamer, 1971. Hegel, Husserl, Heidegger. Mohr: Tübingen, pp. 49-70.
Gadamer, H. -G., 1976. Hegel’s Dialectics. Five Hermeneutical Studies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Grundmann, T., 2003. Was ist eigentlich ein transzendentales Argument? In: A. K. Engelhard and D. Heidemann, eds. 2003. Warum Kant heute? Berlin-New York: de Gruyter, pp. 44-75.
Hegel, G. W. F., 1969. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. In: G. W. F. Hegel, 1969. Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Theorie Werkausgabe, Volume 7, edited by E. Moldenhauer and K. M. Michel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. W. F., 2001. Philosophy of Right. Translation by S. W. Dyde. Ontario: Batoche Books Kitchener.
Hegel, G. W. F., 2010. Science of Logic. Translation by G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henrich, D., 1976. Identität und Objektivität. Eine Untersuchung über Kants transzendentale Deduktion. Heidelberg: Winter.
Henrich, D., 1989. Kant’s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique. In: E. Förster, ed. 1989. Kant’s Transcendental Deductions. Stanford: Standford University Press, pp. 29-46.
Hiltscher, R., 1993. Kants Begründung der Adäquationstheorie der Wahrheit in der transzendentalen Deduktion der Ausgabe B. Kant-Studien, 84(4), pp. 426-447.
Horstmann, R. P., 2006. Hegels Ordnung der Dinge. Die Phänomenologie des Geistes als “transzendentalistisches” Argument für eine monistische Ontologie und seine erkenntnistheoretischen Implikationen. Hegel-Studien, 41, pp. 9-50.
Houlgate, S., 2015. Is Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit an Essay in Transcendental Argument? In: S. Gardner and M. Grist, eds. 2015. The Transcendental Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173-194.
Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I., 2004. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. Translated by G. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kitcher, P., 2011. Kant’s Thinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laywine, A., 2020. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewin, M., 2021. Transcendental Philosophy as a Scientific Research Programme. Kantian Journal, 40(3), pp. 93-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2021-3-4.
Lukács, G., 1973. Der junge Hegel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Moeller, S., 2020. Kant’s Tribunal of Reason. Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R., 2015. Finite and Absolute Idealism. The Transcendental and the Metaphysical Hegel. In: S. Gardner and M. Grist, eds. 2015. The Transcendental Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 159-172.
Priest, G., 1979. The Logic of Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), pp. 219-241.
Puder, M., 1974. Stringenz und Ausdruck. Freiburg: Rombach.
Schäfer, R., 2011. Das bi-polare Ich. Analytische und synthetische Einheit der Apperzeption in Kants Kategoriendeduktion. In: E. Ficara, ed. 2011. Die Begründung der Philosophie im Deutschen Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 245—272.
Stapleford, S., 2008. Kant’s Transcendental Arguments. Disciplining Pure Reason. London & New York: Continuum.
Stekeler-Weithofer, P., 1992. Hegels Analytische Philosophie. Die Wissenschaft der Logik als kritische Theorie der Bedeutung. Paderborn: Schöningh.
Westphal, K., 2021. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories: Critical Re-Examination, Elucidation & Corroboration. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.