Tool-Kit for Ethical Analysis of Video Games: Answer to the Challenges of the New Enlightenment
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2023-2-6
- Pages
- 111-140
Abstract
The authors of the idea of a “new Enlightenment”, Ernst von Weizsäcker and Anders Wijkman, in their 2018 report to the Club of Rome analyse the causes of the explosive development of science and technology in the Modern period and come to the conclusion that their triumph and existential threats stem in many ways from the ideals of Enlightenment, so that the future of humankind depends crucially on an ideological rethinking of man’s status in the world. They stress the need to enhance the responsibility of the individual so that each individual becomes conscious of sharing the destiny of the whole of mankind and the world. I argue that in the framework of Enlightenment 2.0 the Kantian concept of social development, which is closely linked with the moral ideal — the kingdom of ends — may form the basis of the concept of society in which individual freedom and social development are interconnected and the mutually determining elements of the human being in whom freedom can be exercised only if it contributes to social good. The Kantian interpretation of social development as the human being forming the sphere of free being can be the basis of a critical assessment of the content of video games in terms of their media impact on the shaping of the ideology of modern society. I show that the boundaries of the exercise of freedom in a video game, supported by artificial intelligence, influence the way an individual perceives society and his/her place in it. I come to the conclusion that video games, which express a certain idea about society, can contribute to or impede the formation of a new ideological foundation of society whose aim, according to Enlightenment 2.0, should be overcoming the antagonism between the individual and the collective.
Reference
Alves, A., 2019. The German Tradition of Self-Cultivation (Bildung) and its Historical Meaning. Educação & Realidade, 44(2), pp. 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2175-623683003.
Andersen, L. R., 2020. Bildung — Keep Growing. Vermlandsgade: Nordic Bildung.
Andersen, L. R., 2021. What is Bildung? And How Does It Relate to ALE? [pdf] Brussels: The European Association for the Education of Adults (EAEA). Available at: <https://eaea.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/What-is-Bildung-pdf-English.pdf> [Accessed 14 December 2022].
Appel M., Richter T., 2007. Persuasive Effects of Fictional Narratives Increase over Time. Media Psychology, 10(1), pp. 113-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701301194.
Bay, J. L. and Blackmon S., 2014. Inhabiting Professional Writing: Exploring Rhetoric, Play, and Community in Second Life. In: J. deWinter and R. M. Moeller, eds. 2014. Computer Games and Technical Communication. Critical Methods & Applications at the Intersection. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 211-231.
Belov, S. I., 2022. Historical Symbolism of Video Games as a Factor in Correcting the Social Memory of the General Public (on the Materials of the Assassin’s Creed Franchise). Dialogue with Time, 81, pp. 242-248. https://doi.org/10.21267/AQUILO.2022.81.81.017. (In Rus.)
Bogost, I., 2015. How to Talk about Videogames. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bornemann, B., 2019. The Anthropocene and Governance. Critical Reflections on Conceptual Relations. In: T. Hickmann, L. Partzsch, P. Pattberg and S. Weiland, eds. 2019. The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 48-66.
Breuer, J., Festl, R. and Quandt, T., 2012. Digital War: An Empirical Analysis of Narrative Elements in First-Person Shooters. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 4(3), pp. 215-37. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.4.3.215_1.
Bryushinkin, V., 1991. Kant and Artificial Intelligence: World Models. Kantian Journal, 1(16), pp. 80-89. (In Rus.)
Bryushinkin, V. N., 2013. The Transcendental Synthesis of World Models in Intellectual Systems. In: S. Bacin, A. Ferrarin, Cl. La Rocca and M. Ruffing, eds. 2013. Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 691-702. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246490.4551.
Coccaro, E. F., Noblett, K. L., McCloskey, M. S., 2009. Attributional and Emotional Responses to Socially Ambiguous Cues: Validation of a New Assessment of Social/Emotional Information Processing in Healthy Adults and Impulsive Aggressive Patients. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43, pp. 915-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.01.012.
Crutzen, P. and Stoermer, E., 2000. The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, pp. 17-18.
Frasca, G., 2003. Ludologists Love Stories Too; Notes from a Debate That Never Took Place. In: M. Copier and J. Raessens, eds. 2003. Level Up: Digital Games Research: Conference Proceedings. Utrecht: DiGRA and University of Utrecht, pp. 92-99.
Funge, J. and Millington, I., 2016. Artificial Intelligence for Games. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Gabbiadini, A., Andrighetto, L. and Volpato, C., 2012. Does Exposure to Violent Video Games Increase Moral Disengagement Among Adolescents? Journal of Adolescence, 35, pp. 1403-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.06.001
Greitemeyer, T. and Mügge, D., 2014. Video Games Do Affect Social Outcomes: A Metaanalytic Review of the Effects of Violent and Prosocial Gameplay. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, pp. 578-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213520459.
Hamann, J., 2011. “Bildung” in German Human Sciences: The Discursive Transformation of a Concept. History of the Human Sciences, 24(5), pp. 48-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952695111421865.
Hartmann, T., 2012. Moral Disengagement during Exposure to Media Violence: Would It Feel Right to Shoot an Innocent Civilian in a Video Game? In: R. Tamborini, ed. 2012. Media and the Moral Mind. New York: Routledge, pp. 109-131.
Hedley, D., 2017. Bild, Bildung and the “Romance of the Soul”: Reflections upon the Image of Meister Eckhart. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(6-7), pp. 614-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1373343.
Höglund, J., 2008. Electronic Empire: Orientalism Revisited in the Military Shooter. Game Studies — The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 8(1) [online] Available at: <http://gamestudies.org/0801/articles/hoeglund> [Accessed 16 January 2023].
Huizinga, J., 1980. Homo Ludens: Study of the Play Element in Culture. London & Boston & Henley: Routledge.
Kant, I., 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 353-603.
Kant, I., 1998a. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I., 1998b. The Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I., 2007. Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. Translated by A. Wood. In: I. Kant, 2007. Anthropology, History and Education. Edited by G. Zöller and R. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-120.
Kant, I., 2009. Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. Translated by W. S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Kant, I., 2015. Critique of practical reason. Translated and edited by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kemal, S., 1998. Kant, Morality and Society. Kantian Review, 2, pp. 14-50.
Klabbers, J. H. G., 2006. The Magic Circle: Principles of Gaming & Simulation. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Kurtz, A., 2002. Ideology and Interpellation in the First-Person Shooter. In: R. Strickland, ed. 2002. Growing up Postmodern: Neoloberalism and the War on the Young. Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield Publishers, pp. 107-22.
Machin, D., Suleiman. U., 2006. Arab and American Computer War Games: The Influence of a Global Technology on Discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 3(1), pp. 1-22.
McAllister, K. S., 2006. Game Work: Language, Power, and Computer Game Culture (Rhetoric Culture and Social Critique). Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.
Meadows, D. S., Meadows, D. L, Randers, J. and Behrens III, W., 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Signet.
Nichols, R., 2013. Who Plays, Who Pays? Mapping Video Game Production and Consumption Globally. In: N. B. Huntemann and B. Aslinger, eds. 2013. Gaming Globally. Production, Play, and Place. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19-48.
Perron, B., 2012. Magic Circle. In: M. J. P. Wolf, ed. 2012. Encyclopedia of Video Games: The Culture, Technology, and Art of Gaming. Volume 2: M-Z. Westport: Greenwood Press, pp. 369-370.
Prensky, M., 2001. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), pp. 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816.
Prescott, A. T., Sargent, J. D. and Hull, J. G., 2018. Metaanalysis of the Relationship between Violent Video Game Play and Physical Aggression over Time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (40), pp. 9882-9888. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611617114.
Rosen, M., 2022. The Shadow of God: Kant, Hegel, and the Passage from Heaven to History. Harvard: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2kt2g20.
Rouse, R., 2005. Game Design: Theory & Practice. Plano, Texas: Wordware Publishing.
Sestir, M. A. and Bartholow, B. D., 2010. Violent and Nonviolent Video Games Produce Opposing Effects on Aggressive and Prosocial Outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, pp. 934-942.
Sloterdijk, P., 2015. The Anthropocene: A Process-State on the Edge of Geohistory? In: K. Klingan, A. Sepahvand, C. Rosol and B. M. Scherer, eds. 2015. Textures of the Anthropocene: Grain Vapor Ray. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press, pp. 257-271.
Solovyov, E. Yu., 2005. Categorical Imperative of Morality and Law. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija. (In Rus.).
Tapscott, D., 2009. Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw Hill.
Tilley, A., Blandino, C. and deWinter, J., 2014. Developing a Testing Method for Dynamic Narrative. In: J. deWinter and R. M. Moeller, eds. 2014. Computer Games and Technical Communication. Critical Methods & Applications at the Intersection. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 125-140.
Valeriano, B. and Habel, P., 2016. Who Are the Enemies? The Visual Framing of Enemies in Digital Games. International Studies Review, 18(3), pp. 462-486. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv007.