Поиск

... Kaakinen J. Introduction to the special issue on emotions in rea­ding, learning, and communication // Discourse Processes. 2022. Vol. 59, № 1—2. P. 1—12. Bondi M. Dialogicity in written language use: Variation across expert action ga­mes // From Pragmatics to Dialogue / ed. by E. Weigand, I. Kecskes. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia, 2018. P. 137—170. Bornstein O., Katzir M., Simchon A., Eyal T. Differential effects of abstract and conc­re­te processing on the reactivity of basic and self-conscious ...

... on face-to-face interaction. N. Y., 1967. House J. Communicative styles in English and German // European Journal of English Studies. 2006. Vol. 10, № 3. P. 249—267. https://doi.org/10.1080/138255706 00967721. House J., Kádár D. Cross-cultural pragmatics. Cambridge, 2021. Iliadi P. L., Larina T. Refusal strategies in English and Russian // RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics. 2017. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 531—542. https:// doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2017-8-3-531-542. Janney ...

... Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</i>, 23 (1), pp. 88—101. Кобозева И. М. коннектор, союз, дискурс, прагматика, оценка 40-53 10.5922/2225-5346-2025-3-3 connective, conjunction, discourse, pragmatics, evaluation The article is devoted to connectives, i. e., functional words and constructions whose primary function is to express semantic relations between units of discourse. It aims to explore the pragmatic dimension of connectives, which ...

... language / ed. by C. Escobar, L. N. Napdevila. Barcelona, 2011. P. 119—139. Dik S. C. The theory of functional grammar. Berlin; N. Y., 1997. P. 2: The structure of the clause. Complex and derived constructions. Doerge F. Ch . Performative utterances // Pragmatics of Speech Actions / ed. by M. Sbisà, K. Turner. Berlin; Boston, 2013. P. 203—256. Doran Y. J., Martin J. R . Field relations: Understanding scientific explanations // Teaching science / ed. by K. Maton, J. R. Martin, Y. J. Doran. L.; N. ...

... https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0088 . Zolyan, S., 2022b. Semio-poiesis: on the emergence of the semiosphere within the biosphere. Lexia. Rivista di semiotica, 39—40, pp. 101—120, https://doi.org/10.53136/ 97912218042636. Zolyan, S. T., 2023а. Pragmatics as a self-generation of a subject-on-its own. Vop­rosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 7, pp. 93—103, https://doi.org/10.21146/ 0042-8744-2023-7-93-103 (in Russ.). Zolyan, S. T., 2023b. Pragmatics without a subject — but as a “speaking ...

... Spencer, eds. Why gesture? How the hands function in speaking, thinking and com­mu­nicating. Amsterdam, pp. 15—37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.7.02ali">https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.7.02ali</a>. Bara, B., 2010. Cognitive pragmatics. Cambridge. Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L. and Roe, L., 1995. Gestures specialized for dia­logue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (4), pp. 394—405. Biber, D. and Finegan, E., 1989. Styles of stance in English: ...

... 2022.2.3 . Aijmer K. Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity. L. ; N. Y., 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315845128 . Ameka F. A. Comparative analysis of linguistic routines in two languages: English and Ewe // Journal of Pragmatics. 1987. Vol. 11. P. 299—326. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0378-2166(87)90135-4. Austin J. L. How to do things with words. Oxford, 1975. Barotto A., Mauri C. Constructing lists to construct categories // Italian Journal of Linguistics. 2018....

... // Applied Linguistics. 2001. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 195—212. Auer P. Introduction: John Gumperz’ Approach to Contextualization // The Con­textualization of Language. Amsterdam, 1992. P. 1—37. Auer P . Context and contextualization // Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam, 2009. P. 86—101. Beattie G., Ellis A . Conversational Structure // The Psychology of Language and Communication. L., 2018. P. 138—156. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187198 . Beaugrande R.-A. de, Dressler W. U . Introduction ...

... 1985. Austin J. L. How to do things with words: (The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University). Oxford, 1962. Carlyle Th . History of Friedrich II. of Prussia : in 4 vols. 3 rd ed. L., 1859. Vol. 2. Cruse A. A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh, 2006. Declerck R. The definition of epistemic modality // Cognitive approaches to ten­se, aspect, and epistemic modality / ed. by A. Patard, F. Brisard. Amsterdam ; Phila­del­phia, 2011. P. 21—44. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp....

... 3 (2), pp. 261—284. Baker, W., 2018. English as a lingua franca and intercultural communication. In: J. Jenkins, W. Baker and M. Dewey, eds. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca . London: Routledge, pp. 25—36. Baraldi, C., 2019. Pragmatics and agency in healthcare interpreting. In: R. Tipton and L. Desilla, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Pragmatics . London: Routledge, pp. 319—335. Blommaert, J. and Rampton, B., 2011. Language and superdiversity. Diversities,...

... Чернявская В. Е. Текст и социальный контекст: Социолингвистический и дис­курсивный анализ смыслопорождения. М . , 2021 б . Beltrama A . Social meaning in semantics and pragmatics // Language and Lin­guistics Compass. 2020. Vol. 14 , № 9. P. 1 — 20. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12398 . Blommaert J . Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, 2005. Eckert P. Meaning and Linguistic Variation: The Third Wave ...

... вежливости // Антропологиче­ский форум. 2019. № 41. С. 97—120. doi: 10.31250/1815-8870-2019-15-41-97-120. Arundale R . Constituting face in conversation: face, facework and interactional achievement // Journal of Pragmatics. 2010. Vol. 42, № 8. P. 2078—2105. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021. Arundale R . Conceptualizing ‘interaction’ in interpersonal pragmatics: Implica­tions for understanding and research // Journal of Pragmatics. 2013. Vol. 58. P. ...

... Black, E., 2006. Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh. Firth, J. R., 1957. Papers in linguistics: 1934—1951. Oxford. Louw, W. and Milojkovic, M., 2016. Corpus stylistics as contextual prosodic theory and subtext. Amsterdam. Noveck, I., 2021 Experimental pragmatics: The making of a cognitive science. Camb­ridge. Prabowo, R. and Thelwall, M., 2009. Sentiment analysis: A combined approach. Journal of Informetrics, 3 (2), pp. 143—157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.01.003 . Scarantino, A., 2017. ...

... 95–125. Carston, R. and Noh, E.J. (1996) ‘A truth-functional account of metalinguistic negation, with evidence from Korean’, Language Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 485–504. Carston, R. (1996) ‘Metalinguistic negation and echoic use’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 309–330. Carston, R. (1998) ‘Negation, ’presupposition' and the semantics/pragmatics distinction’, Journal of Linguistics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 309–350. Carston, R. (1999) ‘Negation, “presupposition” ...

....org/10.1080/08351813 . 2011.619311. Cherry C. The cocktail party effect // The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Ame­rica. 1953. Vol. 25, № 5. P. 975—979. Fasold R. The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford, 1991. Fleming L., Slotta J. The pragmatics of kin address: A sociolinguistic universal and its semantic affordances // Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2018. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 375—405. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12304 . Isosävi J., Lappalainen H. First names in Starbucks: A clash ...

... Черняков А. Н. почтовая марка, социальная семиотика, прагматика, литературные юбилеи, А. С. Пушкин 117-133 10.5922/2225-5346-2025-3-8 postage stamp, social semiotics, pragmatics, literary anniversaries, Alexander Pushkin The article explores the semiotic potential of a postage stamp as a social communication tool. Despite the fact that a postage stamp is initially a utilitarian means of payment, it is capable of implementing ...

... семиозика, знаковые системы, возможности общения, оязыковление, переоязыковление 7-29 10.5922/2225-5346-2025-3-1 word, λόγος, verbum, case, πρᾶγμα, āctus, acting forces, agency, pragmatics, semiotics, semiosics, sign systems, possibilities of communication, olingualisation, relingualisation A hermeneutical interpretation of Goethe’s Faust’s attempt to interpret the meaning of the Gospel word λόγος, the first three verses ...

... 12. P. 81—112. Hopper P., Thompson S. Transitivity in grammar and discourse // Language. 1980. Vol. 56, № 2. P. 251—299. Hopper P., Thompson S. (eds.). Studies in Transitivity. Syntax and Semantics. N. Y., 1982. Vol. 15. Jasinskaja E. Pragmatics and Prosody of Implicit Discourse Relations : diss. Tübingen, 2009. Prince E. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information // Radical Pragmatics / ed. P. Cole. N. Y., 1981. P. 223—256. Ruytenbeek N. The comprehension of indirect requests: ...

... функциональ­ном ас­пекте (на материале «Театрального романа» М. А. Булгакова) : ав­тореф. дис. … канд. филол. наук. Н. Новгород, 1999. 21. Culpepe J., Gillings M. Pragmatics: Data trend // Journal of Pragmat­ics. 2019. Vol. 145. P. 4—14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.004 . 22. Norrick N. R. Narrative illocutionary acts direct and indirect // Jour­nal of Pragmatics. 2015. Vol. 86. P. 94—99....

... академии наук. 2009. Т. 11, № 4 (5). С. 1337—1343. 13. Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, 1962. 14. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cam­bridge, 1987. P. 56—311. 15. Leech G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. L., 1983. 16. Niсoloff F. Threats and Illocutions // Journal of Pragmatics. 1989. Vol. 13, iss. 4. P. 501—522. 17. Ohm E., Thompson V. Everyday reasoning with inducements and ad­vice // Thinking and Reasoning. 2004. Vol. 10, № 3. Р....

... modern English usage. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, 2015. 12. Cappelen H., Lepore E. Varieties of Quotation // Mind. 1997. № 106. P. 225—241. 13. Chicago. The Chicago manual of style (16th ed.). Chicago, 2010. 14. De Brabanter P. The semantics and pragmatics of hybrid quotations // Language and Linguistics Compass. 2010. № 4 (2). P. 107—120. 15. Johnson M., Lepore E. Misrepresenting Misrepresentation // Understanding Quotation / ed. by E. Brendel, J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach. Walter de Gruyter,...

.... 21. Lucy J. Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge University Press, 1992. 22. Matsumoto Y. Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenome­na in Japanese // Journal of Pragmatics, 1988. № 12. P. 403—426. 23. Rihbany A. M. The Syrian Christ. L., 1920. 24. Sapir E. Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Person­ality. Berkeley, 1958. 25. Whorf B. L. Language, thought, and reality: Selected ...

... присутствие субъекта в поэтическом тексте // Субъект в новейшей русскоязычной поэзии. Bern, 2018. C. 157—169. Green K. A Study of Deixis in Relation to Lyric Poetry. Sheffield, 1992. Levinson S. Pragmatics. Cambridge, 1983. Perloff M. Unoriginal Genius: Poetry by Other Means in the New Century. Chica­go ; L., 2010. Proskurin S., Feshchenko V. Voice and bodily deixis as manifestation of performa­tivity in written texts // Semiotica. 2019. № ...

... everyday life. N. Y., 1959. Goffman E. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. N. Y., 1967. Larina T. Culture-Specific Communicative Styles as a Framework for Interpreting Linguistic and Cultural Idiosyncrasies // International Review of Pragmatics 2015. № 7. Р. 195—215. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00702003 . Leech G. N. Politeness: Is there an East-West Divide? // Journal of Politeness Re­search. 2007. Vol. 3, № 2. Р. 167—206. Leech G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. ...

... перспективы развития : матер. VI междунар. науч.-практ. конф. Минск, 2022. С. 55—60. Forceville C. Visual and multimodal communication across cultures // The Camb­ridge handbook of intercultural pragmatics / ed. by I. Kecskés. Cambridge, MA, 2022. P. 527—551. http://doi.org/10.1017/9781108884303.022 . Guan Y., Forceville C. Making cross-cultural meaning in five Chinese promotional clips: metonymies and metaphors // Intercultural Pragmatics....

... угрозы в политическом дискурсе // Вестник Оренбургского государственного педагогического университета. 2008. № 1 (51). С. 27—33. Leech G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. L., 1983. Levine T. R., Wheeless L. R. Situational intimacy as a predictor of compliance-gai­ning tactic selection // Communication Research Reports. 1997. Vol. 1. P. 132—144. Niсoloff F. Threats and Illocutions // Journal of Pragmatics....

... структура научного текста от Античности до Раннего нового времени / Ред. Ю. В. Иванова. М.: ИД ГУ-ВШЭ, 2011. 3. Blutner, Reinhard & Zeevat, Henk. 2003. Optimality Theory and Pragmatics. Palgrave, London. 4. Dutilh Novaes C. “Medieval obligationes as logical games of consistency maintenance” // Synthese 145, 2005, pp. 371–95. 5. Pietarinen A.-V. The semantics/pragmatics distinction from the game-theoretic point of ...

... Мотовникова неформальная логика, прагматика, формализация, рациональность, субъективность, ценностно-методологические приоритеты. 56-66 informal logic, pragmatics, formalization, rationality, subjectivity, values, methodological priorities. The paper proposes to look at the problem of demarcation criteria of formal and informal logic from its presuppositions and effects. Cognitive “need for better” ...

... (in Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2026-1-2 . Ильин, М. В., 2025. Прагматика семиозиса и оязыковления. Слово.ру: балтий­ский акцент, 16 (3), c. 7—29. [Ilyin, M. V., 2025, The pragmatics of semiosis and linguisation. Slovo.ru: baltic accent, 16 (3), pp. 7—29 (in Russ.)] EDN: KNNOXZ, https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2025-3-1 . Массуми, Б., 2020. Автономия аффекта. Философский журнал,...

... крымский контекст. Симферополь, 2017. С. 68—90. 49. Blommaert J. Sociolinguistic & English language studies // Urban language & Literacies. 2012. Paper 85. 50. Grice H. P. Presupposition and Conversational Implicature // Radical Pragmatics. N. Y., 1981. Р. 183—198. 51. Wiese H. Voices of language outrage: Standard language constructs and the discourse on new urban dialects // Urban language & Literacies. 2014. Paper 120. язык города, региолект, городской ...

... African Cultural Practices towards Global Harmony: Role of Kinship // Review of Arts and Humanities. 2014. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 101—113. Kinnison L. Q. Power, integrity, and mask — An attempt to disentangle the Chi­nese face concept // Journal of Pragmatics. 2017. № 114. P. 32—48. Salifu N. A . Signaling politeness, power and solidarity through terms of address in Dagbanli // Nordic Journal of African Studies. 2010. № 19. P. 274—292. термины родства, семантика,...

... Beliefs // Epistemology, Context, and For­malism / ed. by F. Lihoreau, M. Rebuschi. N. Y., 2014. P. 213—243. Fodor J. D. The Linguistic Description of Opaque Contents: PhD thesis. Cam­bridge MA, 1970. Fraassen B. van. Propositional Attitudes in Weak Pragmatics // Studia Logica. 1979. Vol. 38. P. 365—374. Kaplan D. Quantifying in // Synthese. 1968. Vol. 19. P. 178—214. Kripke S. A . Naming and Necessity. Cambridge MA, 1980. Lewis D . Are We Free to Break the Laws? // Theoria. 1981. Vol. 47. P....

... Berto F., Nolan D . Hyperintensionality // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy / ed. by E. N. Zalta, U. Nodelman [2021]. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ hyperintensionality/ (дата обращения: 01.03.2023). Borg E . Semantics without Pragmatics? // The Cambridge Handbook of Prag­matics / ed. by K. Allan, K. Jaszczolt. Cambridge NY, 2012. Р. 513—528. Burge T . Sinning against Frege // Philosophical Review. 1979. Vol. 88, № 3. P. 398—432. Caplan B . Fregean theories of names ...

... 671. Kravchenko A. V. Biology of cognition and linguistic analysis: From non-realist linguistics to a realistic language science. Frankfurt a/M, 2008. Kravchenko A. V. The experiential basis of speech and writing as different cogni­tive domains // Pragmatics & Cognition. 2009. Vol. 17, № 3. P. 527—548. Kravchenko A. V. A critique of Barbieri’s code biology // Constructivist Founda­tions. 2020. Vol. 15, № 2. P. 122—134. Kravchenko A. V. Approaching linguistic semiosis biologically: implications ...

... entries/truth/ (дата обращения: 01.09.2022). Isenberg A . Deontology and the Ethics of Lying // Aesthetics and Theory of Cri­ticism: Selected Essays of Arnold Isenberg. Chicago, 1973. Р. 245—264. Martin S. Supplemental Update // Semantics and Pragmatics. 2016. Vol. 9, art. 5. P. 1—61. doi: 10.3765/sp.9.5. правда, ложь, аксиология, концепт, фрейм, моделирование, структура 126-136 10.5922/2225-5346-2023-1-8

... Bazzanella C. Segnali discorsivi nel parlato e nello scritto // Scritto e parlato. Metodi, testi, e contesti / a cura di M. Dardano, A. Pelo, A. Stefinlongo. Roma, 2001. P. 79—98. Blakemore D. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge, 2002. Crystal D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge, 2001. Feshchenko V., Sokolova O. Visualising Deixis in Avant-Garde and Contemporary Poetry “On and Off the Page” // Poetry and Contemporary Visual ...

... Возможности описания и использования в пре­подавании языка // Russistik / Русистика. 1990. № 2. С. 20—32. Holmes J. Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategy // Journal of Pragmatics. 1988. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 445—465. Komorowska E., Ohrimovich A. The compliment as a speech act in Russian: A lexi­cal-pragmatic study // Beyond Philology. 2018. № 15/1. P. 49—67. https://doi.org/ 10.26881/bp.2018.1.03. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk ...

... русскому языку. М., 2002. С. 336—349. Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cam­bridge, 1988. Wierzbicka A. Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Eng­lish vs. Polish // Journal of Pragmatics. 1985. Vol. 9, № 2—3. P. 145—178. императивные речевые клише, категория не/анти/вежливости, прагматикализация, речевая коммуникация, лексикографическое ...

... 561—566. Geurts B. Quantity implicatures. Cambridge, 2010. Gigerenzer G., Gaissmaier W. Heuristic decision making // Annual Review of Psy­cho­logy. 2011. Vol. 62. P. 451—482. Johnson-Laird P. N., Byrne R. M. J. Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference // Psychological Review. 2002. Vol. 109, № 4. Р. 646—678. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.646. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challen­ge to Western thought. N. Y., 1999. Stalnaker ...

... Multimodality in corporate communica­tion. Web genres and discursive identity / ed. by G. Garzone, G. Poncini and P. Ca­tenaccio. Milano, 2007. Р. 55—72. Catenaccio P. Press releases as a hybrid genre: Addressing the informative / promotional conundrum // Pragmatics. 2008. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 9—31. doi: 10.1075/ prag.18.1.02cat. Chernyavskaya V. E., Nefedov S. T. Towards social indexicality: From “Kollektiv” to “Team”. And back via Coronavirus pandemic? // Alman Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi — ...

... языка. 1981. Т. 40, № 4. С. 325—326. Althaus H. P., Henne H. Sozialkompetenz und Sozialperformanz. Thesen zur Sozialkommunikation // Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. 1971. Bd. 38, № 1. S. 1—15. Leech G. N. Principles of pragmatics. L., 1983. Marmaridou S. Pragmalinguistics and sociopragmatics // Foundations of prag­ma­tics / ed. by W. Bublitz, N. R. Norrick. Berlin ; N. Y., 2011. P. 77—106. https://doi . org/10.1515/9783110214260.77. New frontiers in Pragmalinguistic ...

... but a quality, acquires in the space of the literary text additional metonymically conditioned meanings through its correlation with the phenomena of existence, in some cases rising to the level of value-­laden symbolic co-meanings. The semantics and pragmatics of each color that shades time in Shakespeare’s texts are determined by metonymic correlation with the phenomena of the external and internal world. Thus, black color, identified with the darkness of night, becomes a methonymic-­metaphorical ...

... 1971. 9. Gupta A. Framework for the analysis of Singapore English // Language, Society and Education in Singapore: Issues and Trends. Singapore, 1998. Р. 32—45. 10. Gupta A. The pragmatic particles of Singapore Colloquial English // Journal of Pragmatics. 1992. № 18 (1). Р. 31—57. 11. Holmes J. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Pearson Longman, 2008. 12. Lee-Wong Song Mei. The Polemics of Singlish // English Today. 2001. Vol. 17, № 1. Р. 39—46. 13. Myers-Scotton С. Multiple ...

....2023). 32. Foucault M. The Archeology of Knowledge. Tavistock, 1977. 33. Halliday M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. L., 1978. 34. Kress G. Language as Ideology. L. ; Boston, 1979. 35. Mey J. L. Pragmatics. An Introduction. Blackwell Publishers, 2001. 36. Van Leeuwen T. Introducing Social Semiotics. Routledge, 2005. дискурс, демонстративная тональность, ситуативно-дискурсивная демонстративность,...

... Kravchenko A. V. Language and mind: A bio-cognitive view // H. Götzsche (ed.). Memory, mind and language . Newcastle upon Tyne, 2009б. P. 103—24. Kravchenko A. V. The experiential basis of speech and writing as different cogni­tive domains // Pragmatics & Cognition. 2009в. Vol. 17, no 3. P. 527—548. Kravchenko A. V. How Humberto Maturana’s biology of cognition can revive the language sciences // Constructivist Foundations. 2011. Vol. 6, № 3. P. 352—362. Kravchenko A. V. Human autopoiesis?...

... Ellipsis, Tense and Questions / eds. I. Heim, H. Kamp. Amster­dam, 1994. P. 87—139. Carnie A. Syntax: a generative introduction. 3rd edition. L., 2007. Charlow S., Sharvit Y. Bound “de re” pronouns and the LFs of attitude reports // Semantics and Pragmatics. 2014. 7 (3). P. 1—43. Cresswell M. J., Stechow A. von. «De Re» Belief Generalized // Linguistics and Philosophy. 1982. 5 (4). P. 503—535. Heim I. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. University of Massachusetts, Amherst,...

.... Giddens A. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, 1984. Grice H. P. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, 1989. Goodman N. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Indianapolis, 1965. Habermas J. On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge, 2003. Kripke S. Wittgenstein on rules and private language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge (Mass.), 1982. Luhmann N. Evolution of science // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2017. Vol. 51, № 1. P. 215—233....

... 2011. Lakoff R. T. The logic of politeness, or minding your P’s and Q’s // Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society / C. Corum, T. C. Smith-Stark, A. Weiser (eds.). Chicago, 1973. Р. 292—305. Leech G. Principles of Pragmatics. N. Y., 1983. Liu B. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan and Claypool, 2012. Seargeant P., Tagg C. (eds.). The Language of Social Media: Identity and Commu­nity on the Internet. L., 2014. Terkourafi M. Toward a unified theory of ...

... Interactive alignment and prediction in dialogue // Ad­vances in Interaction Studies. 2013. Vol. 6. P. 193—204. Gibbs R. W. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understand­ding. Cambridge, 1994. Kecskes I. A Dialogic Approach to Pragmatics // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2016. Vol. 20, iss. 4. P. 26—42. Langacker R. W. Consciousness and Subjectivity // Language, Structure, Dis­course and the Access to Consciousness / ed. by M. Stamenov. Amsterdam, 1997. P. 49—76. Langlotz ...

... Communicator. L. : Routledge, 1997. House J. A Model for Translation Quality Assessment. Tübingen : Narr, 1977. House J. Translation Quality Assessment. A Model Revisited. Tübingen : Narr, 1997. House J. Politeness and Translation // Hickey L. (ed.). The Pragmatics of Trans­la­tion. Clevedon : Avon, 1998. Р. 54—71. House J. Global English, discourse and translation: Linking constructions in Eng­lish and German popular science texts // Target. 2015. Vol. 27, № 3. Р. 370—386. Jaworski A., Coupland ...