Current issue

Language and the nature of humanness. Invitation to a discussion

DOI

10.5922/2225-5346-2022-3-1

Pages

7-24

Abstract

The article invites the reader to contemplate what impedes further development of lan­guage science which is currently in a state of stagnation. This crisis is caused by the inade­quate meth­odology used in linguistic research. It defines the paradigm of so-called ‘normal’ science, which suppresses innovation. The dualistic philosophy of external realism continues to be the epistemo­logical foundation of ‘normal’ linguistics, and neither mainstream cognitive science nor cogni­tive linguistics has been able to break away from it. The author argues that a new, constructivist epistemology is capable of overcoming the crisis and could give a new impetus to further devel­opment of language science. This calls for abandoning the traditional view of language as a tool used for the expression and transfer of thoughts. Instead, research­ers should use a systems ap­proach to linguistic semiosis as a biological adaptation, which is the organizational basis of hu­mans as living systems at both individual and social levels. Lin­guistic semiosis is an evolution­ary stage in the development of Homo sapiens. Establishing the functional role of linguistic semiosis in systemic cognition as a socially organized living system whose unity is ensured and sustained by its circular (self-referential) organization in the relational domain of language, calls for a radical revision of the extant views on the rela­tionship between language and mind, lan­guage and cognition, and language and conscious­ness. An ecological approach to language as­sumes that the cognitive dynamics of humans as living systems consists in the adaptive interac­tional behaviour in the relational domain of linguistic interactions. This domain constitutes the ecological niche of humans as organism-environment systems. It is in this continuously self-constructed human niche that the uniquely human power to reasoning (intelligence) emerges and develops. Humanness rests in language as the creative beginning of the world in which we exist as organisms capable of speech.

Reference

Bunnell, P., 2020. Reflections on languaging. Constructivist Foundations, 15 (2), pp. 152—155.

Button, T., 2013. The Limits of Realism. Oxford.

Cariani, P., 2020. In defense of biosemiotics. Constructivist Foundations, 15 (2), pp. 155—158.

Cooke, M., 2016. The elephant in the room: Communication, chaos and the trans­lation of truth. In: J. Richter, C. Zwischenberger, S. Kremmel and K.-H. Spitzl, eds. (Neu-)Kompositionen. Aspekte transkultureller Wissenschaft. Berlin, pp. 59—76.

Cowley, S. J. and Markoš, A., 2019. Evolution, lineages and human language. Language Sciences, 71, pp. 8—18.

Curtiss, S., 1977. Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day “wild child”. New York.

Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C. and De Jaegher, H., 2018. Linguistic Bodies: The conti­nui­ty between life and language. Cambridge, MA.

Evans, V., 2015. The Crucible of Language: How language and mind create meaning. Cambridge.

Finch, G., 2003. How to Study Linguistics: A guide to understanding language. 2nd ed. Basingstoke.

Foerster, H. von, 1972. Notes on an epistemology for living things. BCL Report No. 9.3 (BCL Fiche No. 104/1). Biological Computer Laboratory, Department of Electrical En­gineering, University of Illinois, Urbana.

Fry, D., 1977. Homo loquens: Man as a talking animal. Cambridge.

Gibson, J., 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA.

Givón, T., 2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, ontogeny, neuro-cognition, evolution. Amsterdam; Philadelphia.

Glasersfeld, E. von, 1995. Radical Constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London.

Glazkov, A. V., 2018. Mode of Reality: Definition, Taxonomy, Features. Prepoda­va­tel XXI vek [The Teacher ХХI century], 3—2, pp. 315—332 (in Russ.).

Jennings, R. E. and Thompson, J. J., 2012. The biological centrality of talk. In: A. V. Kravchenko, ed. Cognitive Dynamics in Linguistic Interactions. Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 33—63.

Kenny, V., 1997. Constructivism — everybody has won and all must have prizes! Transactional Analysis Journal, 27 (2), pp. 110—117.

Kibrik, A. E., 2005. Konstanty i peremennye yazyka [Constants and Variables in Language]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Koshelev, A. D., 2013. Modern linguistic theory as the Tower of Babel (Can nu­me­rous antagonistic linguistic theories peacefully coexist). Izvestiya RAN. Seriya litera­tu­ry i yazyka [The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language], 72(6), pp. 3—22 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V. and Payunena, M. V., 2017. Education: a value lost? In: A. Dud­ziak and J. Orzechowska, ed. Język i tekst w ujęciu strukturalnym i funkcjonal­nym. Olsz­tyn, pp. 239—246.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2001. Cognitive linguistics and the new epistemology (On the ideal project of linguistics) Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatury i yazyka [The Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language], 60 (5), pp. 3—13 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2006. Cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition and biosemi­otics: Bridging the gaps. Language Sciences, 28 (1), pp. 51—75.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2007. Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences, 29 (5), pp. 650—671.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2007. The problem of method in cognitive science. Voprosy Kog­nitivnoy Lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 4, pp. 28—35 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2008. Biology of Cognition and Linguistic Analysis: From non-realist linguistics to a realistic language science. Frankfurt а/M; Berlin; Bern; Bruxelles; New York; Oxford; Wien.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2009. On tradition, linguistics, and the cognitive approach. In: N. K. Riabtseva, ed. Gorizonty sovremennoi lingvistiki: traditsii i novatorstvo [The Hori­zons of Modern Linguistics: Tradition and innovation]. Moscow, pp. 51—65 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2009a. Reassessing the project of linguistics. In: J. Zlatev, M. And­rén, M. J. Falck and C. Lundmark, eds. Studies in Language and Cognition. New­castle upon Tyne, pp. 27—42.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2009b. Language and mind: A bio-cognitive view. In: H. Götz­sche, ed. Memory, Mind and Language. Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 103—124.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2009c. The experiential basis of speech and writing as diffe­rent cognitive domains. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17 (3), pp. 527—548.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2011. How Humberto Maturana’s Biology of Cognition Can Revive the Language Sciences. Constructivist Foundations, 6 (3), pp. 352—362.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2013a. On grounding the ideal project of linguistics: integ­ra­ting language, semiotics, and biology. In: E. I. Pivovar, ed. Gumanitarnye chteniya RGGU — 2012 [The RGGU readings in the humanities — 2012]. Moscow, pp. 285—294 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2013b. The biological reality of language. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 1, pp. 55—63 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2013c. From the Language Myth to Biological Reality: Reassessing the epistemological assumptions of linguistics. Moscow (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2014. Human autopoiesis? Constructivist Foundations, 9 (2), pp. 177—179.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2015a. External realism and biology of cognition: the episte­mo­logical turn. In: E. I. Pivovar, ed. Gumanitarnye chteniya RGGU — 2014 [The RGGU readings in the humanities — 2014]. Moscow, pp. 697—709 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2015b. On the subject matter of linguistics. In: Language and thought: Contemporary cognitive linguistics. Moscow, pp. 155—172 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2016. Language as human ecology: A new agenda for linguis­tic education. New Ideas in Psychology, 42, pp. 14—20.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2016. The epistemological trap of language. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philology], 3 (41), pp. 14—26 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2019. Language and human ecology: from Cartesian linguis­tics to ecolinguistics. Ekologiya yazyka i kommunikativnaya praktika [Ecology of Lan­gua­ge and Communicative Practice], 4 (1), pp. 20—31 (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2020b. On elephants in linguistics. In: M. En, ed. Truths, Trust and Translation: A festschrift, love letter and thank you to Michèle Cooke. Frankfurt а/M, pp. 11—16.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2021. Approaching linguistic semiosis biologically: implica­tions for human evolution. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 15 (2), pp. 139—158.

Kravchenko, A. V., 2021. Otkryvaya yazyk zanovo. Ot nerealistichnoi lingvistiki k real'noi nauke o yazyke. Ot strukturalizma i kognitivizma k ekologicheskomu realizmu: no­vaya povestka dnya v yazykoznanii [Rediscovering Language: From non-realist linguis­tics to a realistic language science. From structuralism and cognitivism to ecological realism. (A new agenda in linguistics)]. Мoscow (in Russ.).

Kravchenko, A. V., 2020a. Author’s response: Codes, interpretation, meaning: Why language matters. Constructivist Foundations, 15 (2), pp. 159—163.

Kuhn, T., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago.

Kull, K., 2007. Biosemiotics and biophysics: The fundamental approaches to the study of life. In: M. Barbieri, ed. Introduction to Biosemiotics. Dordrecht, pp. 167—177.

Love, N., 2007. Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences, 29 (5), pp. 690—709.

Maturana, H. R., 1970. Biology of cognition. Biological Computer Laboratory (BCL) Research Report BCL 9.0. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.

Maturana, H. R., 1978. Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: G. Mil­ler, and E. Lenneberg, eds. Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg. New York, pp. 27—63.

Maturana, H. R., 1985. Comment by Humberto R. Maturana: The mind is not in the head. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 8 (4), pp. 308—311.

Maturana, H. R., Mpodozis, J. and Letelier, J. C., 1995. Brain, language and the ori­gin of human mental functions. Biological Research, 28 (1), pp. 15—26.

Maturana, H. R., 2000. The nature of the laws of nature. Systems Research and Be­havioral Science, 17 (5), pp. 459—468.

Menary, R., 2007. Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29 (5), pp. 621—632.

Mitchell, K., 2017. What are “the laws of biology”? The Biologist, 64 (6), p. 6.

Morris, C. W., 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. In: O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. W. Morris, eds. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol. 1, Part 2. Chicago, pp. 1—59.

Nickerson, R. S., Perkins, D. N. and Smith, E. E., 1985. The Teaching of Thinking. Hillsdale, NJ.

Pepperberg, I. M., 2002. Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11 (3), pp. 83—87.

Pilley, J. W. and Hinzmann, H., 2013. Chaser: Unlocking the genius of the dog who knows a thousand words. Boston.

Pinker, S., 1995. The Language Instinct: How the mind creates language. New York, NY.

Putnam, H., 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge.

Raimondi, V., 2019. The bio-logic of languaging and its epistemological back­ground. Language Sciences, 71, pp. 19—26.

Ross, D., 2007. H. sapiens as ecologically special: What does language contri­bute? Language Sciences, 29 (5), pp. 710—731.

Saussure, F. de, 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris.

Savage-Rumbaugh, S. and Lewin, R., 1994. Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. New York.

Schilhab, T., 2015. Words as cultivators of other minds. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01690.

Sinha, C., 2015. Language and other artifacts: socio-cultural dynamics of niche construction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01601.

Soames, S., 2003. The Dawn of Analysis. Princeton, NJ.

Stewart, J., Gapenne, O. and Di Paolo, E. A., eds., 2011. Enaction: Toward a new pa­radigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA.

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E., 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive sci­ence and human experience. Cambridge, MA.

Vernadsky, V. I., 1989. Biosfera i noosfera [Biosphere and Noosphere]. Moscow (in Russ.).