Search
Submit an article RU
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2024 Vol. 15 №2

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Savelieva E.N. Budenkova V.E. Kraevskaya I.O.

Fyodor Dostoevsky vs Karl Marx: Personal Freedom in Existential and Social Dimensions

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2024-2-3
Pages
47-66
human alienation moral compass faith capitalism socialism

Abstract

The paper explores the perspectives of Fyodor Dostoevsky and Karl Marx regarding hu­man freedom, highlighting their relevance amidst the contradictory landscape of social devel­opment in late capitalism. It is well-established that Dostoevsky's ‘orthodox’ socialist stance resonated with Marx's critique of bourgeois society, focusing on themes of materialism, the dominance of wealth, and alienation. Both thinkers grappled with the concept of human free­dom, recognizing it as an intrinsic characteristic and essential aspect of humanity. While they shared similar views on existential and social dimensions of freedom, they diverged in their conceptual approaches to achieving it. The study aims to demonstrate, through a comparative analysis of Dostoevsky's and Marx's perspectives, that despite differences in their under­standing of freedom and its attainment, their positions can be seen as complementary. Dosto­evsky advocated for inner spiritual improvement, while Marx prioritized external structural change. Research indicates that these perspectives can mutually reinforce each other. The au­thors assert and support the thesis that according to Dostoevsky, achieving spiritual freedom is feasible through labour activity, a concept akin to Marx's notion of praxis.

Reference

An, Q., 2017. Fyodor Dostoevsky and Karl Marx. Voprosy Filosofii [Problems of Phi­losophy], 3, pp. 95—113 (in Russ.).

Berdyaev, N. A., 2016. Dostoevsky’s Contemplation of the World. In: N. A. Ber­dyaev, ed. Russkaya ideya. Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo [The Russian Idea. Dostoev­sky’s Contemplation of the World]. Moscow, pp. 310—511 (in Russ.).

Budenkova, V. E. and Savelieva, E. N., 2016. Identity as a topic of theoretical and methodological analysis: models and approaches. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie [Tomsk State University Journal of Cul­tural Studies and Art History], 1 (21), pp. 31—44, https://doi.org/10.17223/222208 36/21/4 (in Russ.).

Buzgalin, A. V. and Kolganov, A. I., 2015. Global'nyi kapital. Tom 1: Metodologiya: Po tu storonu pozitivizma, postmodernizma i ekonomicheskogo imperializma [Global Capi­tal. Vol. 1 Methodology: Beyond Positivism, Postmodernism and Economic Imperial­ism (Marx re-loaded)]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Chervinskiene, E. P., 1980. Freedom of the individual in the world of Dostoev­sky's ideas. In: Dostoevsky. Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky. Materials and re­search]. Vol. 4. Leningrad, pp. 68—75 (in Russ.).

Dostoevsky, F. M., 1916. The Idiot. Translated by Constance Garnett. New York: Macmillan Company, 626 p.

Dostoevsky, F. M., 1917. Crime and Punishment. Translated by Constance Garnett. New York: Collier & Son Company, 596 p.

Dostoevsky, F. M., 1919. The Diary of a Writer. Translated by Boris Brasol. New York: George Braziller, 1117 p.

Dostoevsky, F. M., 1920. The possessed. Translated by Constance Garnett. London: William Heinemann, 640 p.

Dostoevsky, F. M., 1950. The Brothers Karamazov. Translated by Constance Gar­nett. New York: The Modern Library, 968 p.

Dostoevsky, F. M., 1974. Demons. Chapter “At Tikhon's”. In: F. M. Dostoevsky. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [F. M. Dostoevsky. Complete Works in 30 Volu­mes]. Vol. 11. Leningrad, 417 p. (in Russ.).

Dostoevsky, F. M., 1988. Winter notes on summer impressions. Translated by David Patterson. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 88 p.

Eagleton, T., 2018. Why Marx Was Right. New Haven & London.

Fedotova, V. G., Kolpakov, V. A. and Fedotova, N. N., 2011. Changing Sociality: The Future of Capitalism. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 6, pp. 3—15 (in Russ.).

Foucauld, M., 2010. Rozhdenie biopolitiki. Kurs lektsii, prochitannykh v Kollezh de Frans v 1978—1979 uchebnom godu [Course of lectures given at the Collège de France in the academic year 1978—1979]. Translated by A. V. D'yakov. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Frank, S. L., 2001. The Problem of “Christian Socialism” (1939). In: Neprochitan­noe… Stat'i, pis'ma, vospominaniya [Unread...: articles, letters, memories]. Moscow, pp. 272—290 (in Russ.).

Giuliani, R., 2019. “The Grand Inquisitor”: Text and Context. In: Dostoevsky: mate­rialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky: Materials and Research]. Vol. 22, pp. 103—119, https://doi.org/10.31860/978-5-4469-1628-3-103-119 (in Russ.).

Gritsenko, V. S., 2013. Marxism vs. existentialism? Novye idei v filosofii [New Ideas in Philosophy], 1 (21), pp. 87—93 (in Russ.).

Katasonov, V. Yu., 2020. Dostoevsky o kapitalizme voobshche i rossiiskom v osobennos­ti. Chast' 1 [Dostoyevsky on Capitalism in General and Russian Capitalism in Particu­lar. Part I]. Available at: https://fondsk.ru/news/2020/02/08/dostoevskij-o-kapita lizme-voobsche-i-rossijskom-v-osobennosti-i.html [Accessed 3 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Kharkhordin, O. V., 1997. Dostoevsky project. Pro et Contra, 2 (4), pp. 38—59 (in Russ.).

Kibalnik, S. A., 2017. “Christian Socialism” or “Social Christianity”? (Gogol and Dostoevsky in terms of the history of Russian socio-philosophical thought. Problemy istoricheskoi poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 15 (3), pp. 70—93, https:// doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2017.4481 (in Russ.).

Kibalnik, S. A., 2020. The Nechaevtsy or the Petrashevites? (About Prototypes of the Main Characters in Fedor Dostoevsky's Novel “Demons”). Neizvestnyy Dostoev­skiy [The Unknown Dostoevsky], 2, pp. 119—141, https://doi.org/10.15393/j10.art. 2020.4582 (in Russ.).

Kondrashov, P. N., 2020. Karl Marx on the Generic Nature of Man. Antinomii [Antinomies], 20 (3), pp. 22—48, https://doi.org/10.24411/2686-7206-2020-10302 (in Russ.).

Lesevitsky, A. V., 2015. F. M. Dostoevsky and K. Marx: On the Phenomenon of Money. Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniya [Humanitarian Scientific Research], 2. Available at: Source: http://human.snauka.ru/2015/02/8077 [Accessed 3 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Lossky, N. O., 1994. Bog i mirovoe zlo [God and the World Evil]. Moscow, рр. 316—389 (in Russ.).

Lukacs, G., 1985. Dostojewski: Notizen und Entwürfe. Budapest.

Marx, K., 1955. On the Jewish Question. In: K. Marx i F. Engels. Sochineniya. Iz­danie vtoroe [Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Essays. Second Edition]. Vol. 1. Mos­cow, pp. 382—413 (in Russ.).

Marx, K., 1974. An Outline of J. Mill's “Foundations of Political Economy”. In: K. Marx i F. Engels. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe [Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Es­says. Second Edition]. Vol. 42. Moscow, pp. 5—40 (in Russ.).

Marx, K., 1977. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Moscow, 230 p.

Marx, K., 2010. Capital. Volume III. In: Marx and Engels. Collected works. Vol. 37. Lawrence & Wishart, 992 p.

Merrifield, A., 1999. Notes on Suffering and Freedom: A Marxian and Dostoev­skian Encounter. Rethinking Marxism, 11 (1), pp. 72—86, https://doi.org/10.1080/08935699908685566.

Morillas, J., 2018a. La cuestión del socialismo en Karl Marx y Fiódor M. Dostoievski. HYBRIS, 40, pp. 71—103.

Morillas, J., 2018b. Miguel de Unamuno and F. M. Dostoevsky: Philology, Politics and Religion. Dostoevsky i mirovaya kul'tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal [Dostoevsky and World Culture. Journal of Philology], 1, pp. 148—167, https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2018-1-148-167 (in Russ.).

Nikolsky, S. A., 2021. Temporal Existential Meanings of Dostoevsky’s Heroes and Their Reincarnation by the Bolsheviks. Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 5 (3), pp. 32—55, https:// doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2021-3-32-55 (in Russ.).

Nikolsky, S. A., 2023a. Ideology as a Subject and Subject of Representation in Russian Philosophizing Literature. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 5, pp. 75—78, https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-S-7S-78 (in Russ.).

Nikolsky, S. A., 2023b. The Reorganization of Society, the Re-Creation of Human: The Collapse of Illusions. Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 7 (2), pp. 203—222, https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2023-2-203-222 (in Russ.).

Oittinen, V., 2019. Revolutionary Morality and the Russian Experience: Marx, Bakunin, Dostoyevsky. VOX Filosofskii zhurnal [VOX Phylosophical Journal], 26, pp. 13—24, https://doi.org/10.24411/2077-6608-2019-00002. Available at: https:// vox-journal.org/html/issues/480/495.html [Accessed 3 July 2023] (in Russ.).

Podosokorsky, N. N., 2020. The Legend of Rothschild as the “Napoleon of the Fi­nancial World” in Dostoyevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”. Dostoevsky i mirovaya kul'tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal [Dostoevsky and World Culture. Journal of Philology], 1 (9), pp. 31—50, https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2020-1-31-50 (in Russ.).

Pushchaev, Yu. V., 2021. Dostoevsky as a Member of the Petrashevsky Circle: Was Young Dostoevsky a Revolutionary? Tetradi po konservatizmu [Essays on con­ser­vatism], 1, pp. 229—244, http://dx.doi.org/10.24030/24092517-2021-0-1-229-244 (in Russ.).

Pushchaev, Yu. V., 2022. Dostoevsky and socialism: ambivalent relations. Tetradi po konservatizmu [Essays on conservatism], 4, pp. 238—258, http://dx.doi.org/10.24 030/24092517-2022-0-4-238-258 (in Russ.).

Puschaev, Yu. V., 2023. The Attempt to Re-evaluate the Personality of S. G. Ne­chaev in Soviet Historiography in the 1920s. Background and Context. Voprosy Filoso­fii [Problems of Philosophy], 5, pp. 130—141, https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744- 2023-5-130-141 (in Russ.).

Roberts, P., 2012. Education and the limits of reason: reading Dostoevsky. Educa­tional Theory, 62 (2), pp. 203—223.

Rozanov, V. V., 1996. Sobranie sochinenii. Legenda o Velikom inkvizitore F. M. Dosto­evskogo [Collected Works. The Legend of the Grand Inquisitor by F. M. Dostoyevsky]. Moscow, pp. 7—156 (in Russ.).

Scanlan, J. P., 2002. Dostoevsky the Thinker. New York.

Stepun, F. A., 1962. Dostoevsky's worldview. “Demons” and the Bolshevik Revolution. In: F. A. Stepun, ed. Vstrechi [Meetings]. Munich, pp. 11—57 (in Russ.).

Tihanov, G., 2010. Continuities in the Soviet period. In: A History of Russian Thought. Cambridge, pp. 311—339, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845598.017.

Tikhomirov, B. N., 2019. Sergey Nechaev’s “A Revolutionary’s Catechism”. A Historical Document and Its Role in the Creative History of The Demons. Dostoevsky i mirovaya kul'tura. Filologicheskii zhurnal [Dostoevsky and World Culture. Journal of Philology], 3 (7), pp. 162—178, https://doi.org/10.22455/2619-0311-2019-3-162-178 (in Russ.).

Tillich, P., 1995. Izbrannoe: Teologiya kul'tury [Selected: The Theology of Culture]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Tulchinskiy, G. L., 2021. Dostoevsky: 20th Century Dystopias and a Warning About the Present. Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 5 (3), pp. 56—72, https://doi.org/10.17323/2587- 8719-2021-3-56-72 (in Russ.).

Vladiv-Glover, S., 2018. The Dialectic of Capitalism, Socialism, and the Split Sub­ject in the Phenomenology of Crime and Punishment. The Dostoevsky Journal, 19 (1), pp. 74—83, https://doi.org/10.1163/23752122-01901004.