Search
Submit an article RU
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2025 Vol. 16 №1

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Kravchenko M.A.

Prerequisites for the formation of Neostructuralism as an integral linguistic paradigm

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2025-1-1
Pages
6-23
methodology integral paradigm systemocentrism anthropocentrism ne­ostructuralism

Abstract

This work is the result of methodological reflection related to the comprehension of more than two hundred years of experience accumulated since the secularization of linguistics, and the formation of a reasonable forecast regarding the near and medium-term development of linguistic science. The development of linguistics is determined by the dynamics of para­digms. In understanding the latter term, the author follows the tradition laid down by Kuhn, taking into account the nuances of its transfer to the linguistic soil formulated by academician Stepanov. The paradigm forms a deep methodological framework that has a direct impact on the goals, subject and methods of research. At the same time, the paradigm shift reflects the development and continuity of linguistic knowledge. The driving force behind the develop­ment of linguistics is the competitive struggle between the ideas of anthropocentrism and systemocentrism. To explain the mechanism of paradigmatic cyclicity, the author refers to the concept of the paradigm life cycle. The article demonstrates the signs of "aging" of the current anthropocentric paradigm. Modern linguistics is on the threshold of a new methodological search. At the current moment, prerequisites are emerging for methodological transfor­mations, the result of which may be the creation of an integral (universal) research paradigm capable of providing complete and adequate comprehension of language. Neostructuralism is considered as a variant of the implementation of the integral paradigm, as a linguistic plat­form that provides a return to the fundamental positions of systemocentrism while preserving the most productive ideas of anthropocentrism. The research principles of neostructuralism encompass holism, taxonomy (emphasis on taxometric approaches), semiotics (focus on the semiotic nature of language), multidimensionality, functionalism, and textocentrism.

Reference

Alefirenko, N. F., 2002. Paradigms of modern science of language: Traditions and innovations. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Se­riya: Filologicheskie nauki [Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University. Se­ries Philological sciences], 1, pp. 5—13 (in Russ.).

Alpatov, V. M., 1993. On anthropocentric and system-centric approaches to lan­guage. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 3, pp. 15—26 (in Russ.).

Alpatov, V. M., 2015. Linguistics: What and How? Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 3, pp. 7—21 (in Russ.).

Alpatov, V. M., 2020. “The great crisis” in the history of linguistics and how it was overcome. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 5, pp. 7—21, https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658X.2020.5.7-21 (in Russ.).

Baudouin de Courtenay, I. A., 1963. About the tasks of linguistics. In: Izbrannye trudy po obshchemu yazykoznaniyu [Selected works on general linguistics]. Vol. 1. Mos­cow, pp. 203—221 (in Russ.).

Berezin, F. M., 2000. On paradigms in the history of linguistics of the XX century. In: Lingvisticheskie issledovaniya v kontse XX v. [Linguistic research at the end of the XX century]. Moscow, pp. 5—13 (in Russ.).

Cassirer, E., 1945. Structuralism in modern linguistics. Word, 1, pp. 105—115.

Demyankov, V. Z., 2008. The term paradigm in the “native” and “alien” areas. In: Paradigmy nauchnogo znaniya v sovremennoi lingvistike : sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Para­digms of scientific knowledge in modern linguistics : a collection of scientific papers]. Moscow, pp. 5—39 (in Russ.).

Dubrovskaya, T. V., 2019. Paradigms in Modern Russian and Foreign Linguistics: Nature, Dynamics, and Philosophical Grounds. Nauchnyi dialog, 9, pp. 73—87, https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2019-9-73-87 (in Russ.).

Faktorovich, A. L. and Rudenko, D. I., 1993. Philosophy of Language: towards Reflection on Boundaries (As an introduction)]. In: Filosofiya yazyka: v granitsakh i vne gra­nits [Philosophy of language: within and beyond borders]. Vol. 1. Kharkiv, pp. 3—12 (in Russ.).

Goddard, C., 2006. Ethnopragmatics. A new paradigm. In: Ethnopragmatics: Un­derstanding Discourse in Cultural Context. Berlin; New York, pp. 1—30, https://doi. org/10.1515/9783110911114.

Hjelmslev, L., 1960. Prolegomena to the theory of language. In: Novoe v lingvistike [New in linguistics]. Vol. 1. Moscow, pp. 264—389 (in Russ.).

Humboldt, W. von., 2000. On the difference in the structure of human languages and its influence on the spiritual development of mankind. In: Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu [Selected works on linguistics]. Moscow, pp. 37—298 (in Russ.).

Jakobson, R., 1975. Linguistics and poetics. In: Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv» [Struc­turalism: “pro” and “contra]. Moscow, pp. 193—230 (in Russ.).

Jakobson, R., 1996. The importance of linguistic universals for linguistics. In: Yazyk i bessoznatel'noe [Language and the unconscious]. Moscow, 184—198 (in Russ.).

Karaulov, Yu. N., 2010. Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost' [Russian language and linguistic personality]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Khomutova, T. N., 2009. Scientific paradigms in linguistics. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Philological Sciences], 35, pp. 142—151 (in Russ.).

Khun, T., 1975. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii [The structure of scientific revolu­tions]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Kiklevich, A., 2012. Paradigms of linguistics as types of character profiling. In: Yazyk i metod. Russkii yazyk v lingvisticheskikh issledovaniyakh XXI veka [Language and method. The Russian language in Linguistic research of the 21st century]. Vol. 1. Kraków, pp. 119—133 (in Russ.).

Kubryakova, E. S., 2008. The concept of “paradigm” in linguistics: Introduction. In: Paradigmy nauchnogo znaniya v sovremennoi lingvistike : sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Paradigms of scientific knowledge in modern linguistics : a collection of scientific pa­pers]. Moscow, pp. 4—14 (in Russ.).

Kubryakova. E. S., 1994. Paradigms of scientific knowledge in linguistics and its current status. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya: literatura i yazyk [Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series: Literature and language], 53 (2), pp. 3—15 (in Russ.).

Levisen, C., 2012. Cultural semantics and social cognition. A case study of the Danish universe of meaning. Berlin, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110294651.

Maslova, V. A., 2018. The Main Trends and Principles of Modern Linguistics. Russian Language Studies, 16 (2), pp. 172—190, https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2264- 2018-16-2-172-190 (in Russ.).

Postovalova, V. I., 2016a. Linguistic Reality and The Ways of Its Comprehension (Ascension) Towards Integral Paradigms. Metaphysics, 4, pp. 59—77 (in Russ.).

Postovalova, V. I., 2016b. Nauka o yazyke v svete ideala tsel'nogo znaniya: v poiskakh in­tegral'nykh paradigm [The science of language in the light of the ideal of integral knowledge: in search of integral paradigms]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Rudenko, D. I., 1993. Linguophilosophical paradigms: boundaries of language and boundaries of culture. In: Filosofiya yazyka: v granitsakh i vne granits [Philosophy of language: within and beyond borders]. Vol. 1. Kharkiv, pp. 101—173 (in Russ.).

Saussure, de F., 1977. General Linguistics Course. In: F. de Saussure, ed. Trudy po yazykoznaniyu [Works on linguistics]. Moscow, pp. 31—269 (in Russ.).

Sériot, P., 1993. In search of the fourth paradigm. In: Filosofiya yazyka: v granitsakh i vne granits [Philosophy of language: within and beyond borders]. Vol. 1. Kharkiv, pp. 37—52 (in Russ.).

Stepanov, Yu. S. and Proskurin, S. G., 1993. The change of “cultural paradigms” and its internal mechanisms. In: Filosofiya yazyka: v granitsakh i vne granits [Philosophy of language: within and beyond borders]. Vol. 1. Kharkiv, pp. 13—36 (in Russ.).

Stepanov, Yu. S., 1985. V trekhmernom prostranstve yazyka: semioticheskie problemy lingvistiki, filosofii, iskusstva [In the three-dimensional space of language: semiotic problems of linguistics, philosophy, art]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Wierzbicka, A., 1997. Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Rus­sian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford.

Wierzbicka, A., 1999. Emotions across languages and cultures: diversity universals. Cambridge.

Zhivov, V. and Timberlake, A., 1997. Parting with structuralism (theses for dis­cussion). Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 3, pp. 3—14 (in Russ.).

Zolyan, S. T., 2021. How to reconcile Luhmann with Saussure: The principle of intrasystemic differentiation as a basis for a neo-structuralist approach. Voprosy Jazy­koznanija [Topics in the study of language], 1, pp. 121—141, https://doi.org/10. 31857/0373-658X.2021.1.121-141 (in Russ.).

Zolyan, S. T., 2022. Yuri Lotman: On problems of language and linguistics. Vo­prosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 1, pp. 106—119, https://doi.org/ 10.31857/0373-658X.2022.1.106-119 (in Russ.).