Search
Submit an article RU
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2024 Vol. 15 №4

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Akimova M.V.

The State Academy of Artistic Sciences versus Petrograd formalism: Verse theory. II. On Zhirmunsky’s “Rhyme, its history and theory”

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2024-4-14
Pages
204-221
Russian Formalism GAKhN MLK theory of verse Kœnigsberg Zhirmun­sky Shtokmar

Abstract

The article presents a historical and scientific analysis of the oral presentations and other works that criticized Boris Eikhenbaum’s “Melodics of Verse” and Viktor Zhirmunsky’s “Rhyme, Its History and Theory” from the perspective of Moscow formalism. The overview relies on unknown materials, which can thus be introduced into scholarly discourse. It refers to the presentations made by the philologist and philosopher Maksim Kœnigsberg and the literary scholar Mikhail Shtokmar, a student of Boris Yarkho at the State Academy of Artistic Sciences. In addition, the data from the newly discovered article by Maxim Kœnigsberg, “Compound Rhymes in the Lyrics of Innokentii Annenskii” (1924), is explored. The theses of Kœnigsberg’s exposé are published for the first time, with notes. The aim of the article is to reveal the polemical layer in the works of Moscow formalists. This is achieved by identifying key positions in the analysed texts, by their historical commentary, mutual comparison, and the discovery of authors’ logic. The results of the research include the publication of archival materials and their interpretation in the context of internal formalistic polemics. New materi­als reveal that Zhirmunsky allowed Kœnigsberg to develop his own theory of verse with an orientation towards semantics; whereas Shtokmar, on the contrary, rejected an important part in Zhirmunsky’s rhyme theory. The interrelation between different branches of the Russian formalism become clearer.

Reference

Akimova, M. V., 2024. State Academy of Artistic Sciences vs. Formalism in Pet­rograd: Theory of verse. 1. On Boris Eikhenbaum’s “Melodics of verse”. Vremennik russkogo formalizma, 1 (1), р. 77—106, https://doi.org/10.14672/rf.v1i1.2443 (in Russ.).

Chubarov, I. M., 2013. Critics of Formalism in GAKhN. In: Russkii formalizm (1913—2013): Mezhdunarodnyi kongress k 100-letiyu russkoi formal'noi shkoly: tezisy dokladov [Russian Russian Formalism (1913—2013): International Congress on the 100th Anniversary of the Russian Formal School: abstracts]. August, 25—29. Mos­cow, pp. 160—161 (in Russ.).

Depretto, C., 2008. La question du formalisme moscovite. Revue des études slaves, 79 (1/2), pp. 87—101.

Dmitriev, A., 2009. How formal-philosophical school made? In: M. A. Kolerov and N. S. Plotnikov, eds. Issledovaniya po istorii russkoi mysli: Ezhegodnik za 2006—2007 go­dy [Studies on history of Russian thought: The yearbook for 2006—2007]. Vol. 8. Mos­cow, pp. 71—96 (in Russ.).

Eikhenbaum, B., 1922. Melodika russkogo liricheskogo stikha [Melodics of Russian lyric verse]. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Gasparov, M. L., 1997. Izbrannye trudy. T. III: O stikhe [Collected works. Vol. 3: On verse]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Gasparov, M. L., 2000. Ocherk istorii russkogo stikha [An essay on the history of Russian verse]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Gornung, B., 2001. Pokhod vremeni. Stat'i i esse [Campaign of time. Articles and essays]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Gornung, B. V., 2017. To the question of subject of poetics. In: N. S. Plotnikov, N. P. Podzemskaya and Yu. N. Yakimenko, eds. Iskusstvo kak yazyk — Yazyki iskusstva. Gosudarstvennaya akademiya khudozhestvennykh nauk i esteticheskaya teoriya 1920-kh godov [Art as a language — The languages of art. The State Academy of Art Sciences and Aesthetic Theory of the 1920s]. Vol. II. Moscow, pp. 487—512 (in Russ.).

Grübel, R., 2010. “Krasnorechivey slov inykh / Nemye razgovory”: Concept of inner form in “Khudozhestvennaya forma” by GAKhN (1927) through the prism of conceptions by Gustav Shpet, Russian formalists and Mikhail Bakhtin. Logos, 2 (75), pp. 11—34 (in Russ.).

Hansen-Löve, A., 2012. Die ‘Formal-Philosophische Schule’ in der russischen Kunsttheorie des zwanziger Jahre. Ein Überblick [1978/1987]. In: Zwischen den Le­benswelten. Interkulturelle Profile der Phänomenologie. Berlin, s. 205—257.

Kœnigsberg M. M., 2017. Concept of inner form in Anton Marty’s work and the possibility of further interpretation. In: N. S. Plotnikov, N. P. Podzemskaya and Yu. N. Yakimenko, eds. Iskusstvo kak yazyk — Yazyki iskusstva. Gosudarstvennaya akademiya khudozhestvennykh nauk i esteticheskaya teoriya 1920-kh godov [Art as a language — The languages of art. The State Academy of Art Sciences and Aesthetic Theory of the 1920s]. Vol. II. Moscow, pp. 228—261 (in Russ.).

Kœnigsberg, M. M., 1994. From versological fragments. Analysis of the concept of “verse”. Philologica, 1 (1/2), pp. 149—185 (in Russ.).

Kœnigsberg, M., 2012. Notes on rime (From poetic studies, 1923). Philologica, 9 (21/23), pp. 334—356 (in Russ.).

Levinton, G. A. and Ustinov, A. B., 1990. To the history of type-written periodi­cals of the 1920s. In: Tynyanovskii sbornik. V Tynyanovskie chteniya [Tynianov’s collec­tion. V Tynianov’s readings]. Riga, pp. 197—210 (in Russ.).

Mazur, S., 1995. State Academy of Artistic Sciences (GAKhN). In: Russkaya filoso­fiya. Malyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar' [Russian philosophy. Small Encyclopedic Diction­ary]. Moscow, pp. 140—142 (in Russ.).

Pilshchikov, I. and Ustinov, A., 2020. The Moscow Linguistic Circle and the for­mation of Russian verse studies (1919—1920). In: L. Fleishman, D. M. Bethea and I. Vinitsky, eds. Stanford Slavic Studies 50. Unacknowledged Legislators: Studies in Russian Literary History and Poetics in Honor of Michael Wachtel. Berlin, pp. 389—413 (in Russ.).

Pilshchikov, I., 2022. The four faces of Russian formalism. In: M. Mrugalski, Sch. Schahadat and I. Wutsdorff in coll. with D. Ulicka, eds. Central and Eastern European literary theory and the West. Berlin, pp. 212—257.

Pilshchikov, I. A., 2014. “The Inner Form of the Word” in the Theories of Poetic Language. Kritika i semiotika [Critique and Semiotics], 2, pp. 54—76 (in Russ.).

Plotnikov, N. S., 2017. Structure and history. The program of philosophical stud­ies of art at the GAKhN. In: N. S. Plotnikov, N. P. Podzemskaya and Yu. N. Yakimen­ko, eds. Iskusstvo kak yazyk — Yazyki iskusstva. Gosudarstvennaya akademiya khudozhest­ven­nykh nauk i esteticheskaya teoriya 1920-kh godov [Art as a language — The languages of art. The State Academy of Art Sciences and Aesthetic Theory of the 1920s]. Vol. I. Moscow, pp. 29—43 (in Russ.).

Plotnikov, N. S., 2021. Beyond encyclopedia: A short story of concept of “form”. In: N. Sazonov and A. Hennig, eds. Sintez sovremennosti. Ruiny GAKhN i postdistsipli­narnost' [Synthesis of modernity. The ruins of GAKhN and postdisciplinarity]. Mos­cow, pp. 239—250 (in Russ.).

Polilova, V., 2011. Debates around “Khudozhestvennaya forma” and “Ars Poetica” volumes: Boris Yarkho and OPOYaZ. Studia Slavica: sbornik rabot molodykh filolo­gov [Studia Slavica: collection of works by young philologists]. Vol. X. Tallinn, pp. 153—170 (in Russ.).

Shapir, M. I., 1990. [Additions: Commentaries; References; Indexes]. In: G. O. Vi­nokur, ed. Filologicheskie issledovaniya: Lingvistika i poetika [Studies in philology: Lin­guistics and Poetics]. Moscow, pp. 256—448 (in Russ.).

Shapir, M. I., 1994a. Kœnigsberg and his phenomenology of verse. Russian Lin­guistics, 18 (1), pp. 73—113 (in Russ.).

Shapir, M. I., 1994b. Protocols of Moscow linguistic circle, 26 Feb. 1923. Philologi­ca, 1 (1/2), pp. 191—201 (in Russ.).

Shpet, G., 1989. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Toddes, E. A. and Chudakova, M. O., 1981. First Russian translation of Ferdinand de Saussure’s “Course of General Linguistics” and activiry of Moscow linguistic cir­cle (Materials for the study of the existence of a scientific book in the 1920s). In: Fedo­rovskie chteniya 1978 [Fedorov’s readings, 1978]. Moscow, pp. 229—249 (in Russ.).

Tynyanov, Yu. N., 1924. Problema stikhotvornogo yazyka [The problem of poetic language]. Leningrad (in Russ.).

Venditti, M., 2010. Maksim Kœnigsberg’s study on inner form in Anton Marty’s work (1924). Logos, 2 (75), pp. 150—161 (in Russ.).

Venditti, M., 2017. The philosophical foundations of literary studies in the GAKhN. In: N. S. Plotnikov, N. P. Podzemskaya and Yu. N. Yakimenko, eds. Iskusstvo kak yazyk — Yazyki iskusstva. Gosudarstvennaya akademiya khudozhestvennykh nauk i este­ticheskaya teoriya 1920-kh godov [Art as a language — The languages of art. The State Academy of Art Sciences and Aesthetic Theory of the 1920s]. Vol. I. Moscow, pp. 227—263 (in Russ.)

Zhirmunsky, V. M., 1922. Poeziya Aleksandra Bloka [Aleksandr Blok’s poetry]. Pe­tersburg (in Russ.).

Zhirmunsky, V. M., 1923. Rifma, ee istoriya i teoriya [Rime, its history and theory]. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Zhirmunsky, V. M., 1925. Vvedenie v metriku: teoriya stikha [Introduction to the Met­ric: the Theory of verse]. Leningrad (in Russ.).