Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2024 Vol. 15 №4

Back to the list Download the article

Who and how produces the future (Alexander Fedorov’s new philosophy of common cause)

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2024-4-1
Pages
8-24

Abstract

The article presents a reflection on Alexander Fedorov's project aimed at analysing the future and the model of production. This model facilitates the correlation of factors related to subjectivity and sociality within the process of future production. Notably, the work emphasizes Alexander Fedorov's assertion regarding the pivotal role of children and childhood and the typology of actors involved in this process. The proposed concept and model establish a fertile ground for further interdisciplinary research. From the perspective of social semiotics and pragmasemantics, shaping the future emerges as a form of meaning-making and institutionalization, unfolding through a series of interfaces that enable interaction across socio-cultural practice contexts. In this framework, subjectivity is identified as a crucial interface for such interactions. Moreover, a comparative analysis of natural and artificial intelligence underscores the complex potential inherent in this research problem. While human beings possess advantages stemming from bodily experience, sexual dimorphism, and other forms of vitality over artificial intelligence, the future is largely grounded in this vitality, exemplified by the essence of childhood. Consequently, the question of management possibilities and the ethical dimensions of future production, as well as the balance between permissible and impermissible means employed, becomes particularly salient.

Reference

A-n, A., Zalkind, A. B., Lobach-Zhuchenko, M. B., Blokhin, P., Melik-Pashaev, N. Sh., Orlov, S. V. and Chayanov, A., 1928. Zhizn' i tekhnika budushchego. (Sotsial'nye i nauchno-tekhnicheskie utopii) [Life and technology of the future. (Social and scientific-technical utopias)]. Moscow; Leningrad, 504 p. (in Russ.).

Ananchenko, A. B., ed., 2016. Obrazy budushchego Rossii: zhelaemoe — vozmozhnoe — neobkhodimoe [Images of the future of Russia: desired — possible — necessary]. Mos­cow, 275 p. (in Russ.).

Asmolov, A. G., Shekhter, E. D. and Chernorizov, A. M., 2018. Preadaptatsiya k neo­predelennosti: nepredskazuemye marshruty evolyutsii [Pre-Adaptation to Uncertainty: Unpredictable Evolutionary Routes]. Moscow, 212 p. (in Russ.).

Assman, A., 2012. Transformation of the new time regime. Novoe literaturnoe oboz­renie [New Literary Review], 4, pp. 16—31 (in Russ.).

Badiou, A., 2007. Being and Event. New York, 526 p.

Bainhauer, H. and Schmakhe, E., 1973. Mir v 2000 godu. Svod mezhdunarodnykh prognozov [The world in 2000. Compendium of international forecasts]. Moscow, 240 p. (in Russ.).

Bakhtin, M. M., 1986. To the philosophy of action. In: Filosofiya i sotsiologiya nauki i tekhniki: ezhegodnik1984—1985 [Philosophy and Sociology of Science and Techno­lo­gy: Yearbook. 1984—1985]. Moscow, pp. 80—160 (in Russ.).

Bernal, J. D., 1956. Nauka v istorii chelovechestva [Science in the history of society]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Bestuzhev-Lada, I. V., 1970. Okno v budushchee. Sovremennye problemy sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya [Window to the future. Modern problems of social forecasting]. Moscow, 269 p. (in Russ.).

Bevolo, M., 2021. Design Futures and Education for Life Essentials. Academia Let­ters, article 3935, https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3935.

Damasio, A., 2010. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York, 384 p.

Fedorov, A. A., 2023 Proizvodstvo budushchego. Mir «dvoinogo dvoetochiya» [Manu­fac­turing of the future. The world of the “double colon”]. St. Petersburg, 496 p. (in Russ.).

Ferrando, F., 2022. Filosofskii postgumanizm [Philosophical Posthumanism]. Mos­cow, 360 p. (in Russ.).

Fokin, A. A., 2007. Obrazy kommunisticheskogo budushchego u vlasti i naseleniya SSSR na rubezhe 50—60-kh gg. XX veka [Images of the communist future among the authorities and the population of the USSR at the turn of the 50—60s XX century]. PhD Dissertation. Chelyabinsk, 218 p. (in Russ.).

Gromyko, Yu. V., 2013. Klass RAZVITIE [RAZVITIE class]. Moscow, 240 p. (in Russ.).

Henrich, D., 2018. Myshlenie i samobytie. Chteniya o sub"ektivnosti [Thinking and being. Readings about subjectivity]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Hofstadter, D., 2022. Ya — strannaya petlya [I am strangle loop]. Moscow, 512 p. (in Russ.).

In 2017... In: Ezhegodnik APN 1968 goda [APN Yearbook 1968]. Moscow, 1968. 340 p. (in Russ.).

Kan, G., Braun, W. and Martel, L., 1978. Sleduyushchie 200 let. Stsenarii dlya Ame­riki i vsego mira [The next 200 years. Scenario for America and the whole world]. Moscow, 228 p. (in Russ.).

Karpunin, V. A., 2004. Volya k bytiyu: Ontologicheskii impul's [The Will to Being: The Ontological Impulse]. St. Petersburg, 288 p. (in Russ.).

Kassof, A., ed., 1970. Budushchee sovetskogo obshchestva [Prospects for Soviet So­cie­ty]. Iss. 1. Moscow (in Russ.).

Khodorkovsky, M. B., ed., 2006. Vvedenie v budushchee. Mir v 2020 godu [Introduc­tion to the future. The world in 2020]. Moscow, 384 p. (in Russ.).

Koselleck, R., 1985. Futures past: on the semantics of historical time. Cambridge, 317 p.

Kovalev, V. A., 2019. From ideology to utopia. The communist project of Ivan Efremov. Nasledie [Heritage], 1 (14), pp. 104—118, https://doi.org/10.31119/hrtg. 2019.1.8 (in Russ.).

Kreveld, M. van., 2022. Prozrevaya budushchee. Kratkaya istoriya predskazanii [Seeing into Future. A Short History of Prediction]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Larina, E. and Ovchinsky, V., 2022. Memories of the future — 2050. Technolo­gical revolution: results and forecasts. Available at: https://zavtra.ru/blogs/vospo minanie_o_budushem_2050 [Accessed 24 June 2024] (in Russ.).

Latour, В., 2014. Peresborka sotsial'nogo: Vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu [Reas­sembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Lem, S., 1968. Summa tekhnologii [Summa technologicae]. Moscow, 608 p. (in Russ.).

Lubke, A., 1929. Tekhnika i chelovek v 2000 godu [Technology and man in 2000]. Moscow, 179 p. (in Russ.).

Medvedev, Yu. E., 1975. V pervom priblizhenii [In the first approximation]. Moscow, 272 p. (in Russ.).

Mir cherez 100 let: sbornik statei [The world through 100 years: collection of ar­ticles], 2016. Moscow, 408 p. (in Russ.).

Monfort, N., 2021. Budushchee: printsipy i praktiki sozidaniya [The future: the prin­ciples and practices of creation]. Moscow, 160 p. (in Russ.).

Mukhametshina, E. and Ivanov, M., 2023. The president's administration has defined five images of the future desired by Russians. Available at: https://www. vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2023/07/17/985583-administratsiya-prezidenta-opre delila-pyat-obrazov-zhelaemogo-rossiyanami-buduschego [Accessed 21 June 2024] (in Russ.).

Paniotova, T. S. and Romanenko, M. A., 2019. Distorting mirrors of the avant-garde: utopian projections of Soviet civilization. Dialog so vremenem [Dialogue with Time], 69, pp. 237—250 (in Russ.).

Pestel, E., 1988. Za predelami rosta [Beyond Growth]. Moscow, 272 p. (in Russ.).

Potemkin, A., 2018. Pervyi global'nyi vsemirnyi infrastrukturnyi proekt [The first global worldwide infrastructure project]. Moscow, 136 p. (in Russ.).

Pyzhov, N., 1929. Sovetskii gorod zavtra (kartiny blizhaishego razvitiya) [Soviet city tomorrow. (Pictures of proximal development)]. Moscow; Leningrad, 96 p. (in Russ.).

Rumyantsev, A. M. and Mamardashvili, M. K., eds., 1964. Kakoe budushchee ozhidaet chelovechestvo? [What future awaits humanity?]. Moscow, 504 p. (in Russ.).

Ryurikov, J., 1961. Cherez 100 i 1000 let [In 100 and 1000 years]. Moscow, 112 p. (in Russ.).

Sedashov, N., 2023. Longing for a past that never existed: what causes the epidemic of nostalgia. Available at: https://www.forbes.ru/tekhnologii/511059- toska-po-proslomu-kotorogo-ne-bylo-cem-obuslovlena-epidemia-nostalgii [Accessed 23 June 2024] (in Russ.).

Shikarev, S., Verkin, E. and Breininger, O., 2023. Novoe budushchee [New future]. Мoscow, 352 p. (in Russ.).

Sorensen, E., 2012. Mechta o sovershennom obshchestve. Fenomen totalitarnoi ideologii [The dream of a perfect society. The phenomenon of totalitarian ideology]. Мoscow, 232 p. (in Russ.).

Strumilin, S. G., 1964. Nash mir cherez 20 let [Our world in 20 years]. Мoscow, 192 p. (in Russ.).

Thomson, G., 1958. Predvidimoe budushchee [The foreseeable future]. Мoscow, 176 p. (in Russ.).

Toffler, A., 1997. Futurshok [Futureshock]. St. Petersburg, 464 p. (in Russ.).

Tulchinskii, G. L., 2019. Extensions of the semiotic analysis capabilities: the sources and content of the “deep semiotics” concept. Voprosy filosofii [Problems of Philosophy], 11, pp. 115—125, https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440007358-8 (in Russ.).

Tulchinskii, G. L., 2020. Filosofiya postupka: samoopredelenie lichnosti v sovremennom obshchestve [Philosophy of action: self-determination of personality in modern so­cie­ty]. St. Petersburg, 826 p. (in Russ.).

Tulchinskii, G. L., 2021. Value-normative synthesis of knowledge. In: Mir che­lo­veka: normativnoe izmerenie — 7.0 [The human world: normative dimension — 7.0]. Saratov, pp. 226—243 (in Russ.).

Tulmin, S., 1984. Chelovecheskoe ponimanie [Human understanding]. Moscow, 328 p. (in Russ.).

Tyugashev, E. A., 2023 Utopia as a Form of Social Consciousness: The Problem of Demarcation. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ser. Filosofiya [Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series Philosophy], 5 (1), pp. 11—20, https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2023.5.2 (in Russ.).

Utopicheskii sotsializm: khrestomatiya [Utopian socialism. Anthology], 1982. Мos­cow, 512 p. (in Russ.).

Vasil’ev, M. V. and Gushchev, S. Z., 1958. Reportazh iz XXI veka. My zapisali rasskazy dvadtsati devyati sovetskikh uchenykh o nauke i tekhnike budushchego [Report from the 21st century. We recorded the stories of twenty-nine Soviet scientists about the science and technology of the future]. Moscow, 248 p. (in Russ.).

Volokhova, U., 2019. «Ya zhe preduprezhdal vas, chertovy duraki » [“I warned you, you damn fools”]. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5785150 [Ac­ces­sed 22 June 2024] (in Russ.).

Wells, G., 1902. Predvideniya o vozdeistvii progressa mekhaniki i nauki na chelo­ve­cheskuyu zhizn' i mysl' [Predictions about the impact of the progress of mechanics and science on human life and thought]. Moscow, 291 p. (in Russ.).

Zolyan, S. T., 2016. The semiotics and pragmasemantics of the political discourse. Politicheskaya nauka [Political Science (RU)], 3, pp. 47—76 (in Russ.).

Zolyan, S., 2021. On pragma-semantics of expressives. Between words and ac­tions. In: A. Haselow and S. Hancil, eds. Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface. Ams­terdam, pp. 245—271, https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.219.09zol.

Zolyan, S. T. and Tulchinskii, G. L., 2024. Dinamika smysla: Glubokaya semiotika i stereometricheskaya semantika [Dynamics of meaning: Deep semiotics and stereometric semantics]. Moscow (in Russ.).