Search
Submit an article
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2023 Vol. 14 №4

Back to the list Download the article
Mikirtumov I.B.

How presuppositions and illocutionary force become components of sense: some implications from the analysis of fictitious names in Frege’s philosophy

DOI
10.59222225-5346-2023-4-3
Pages
48-72
Frege sense denotation thought fiction naming propositional attitude in­tention

Abstract

Frege's fictitious names possess meaning but lack denotation. Both these names and the sentences containing them are deemed fictitious. Since any proper name can potentially refer to an imaginary entity, it is crucial to consider the speaker's intention. When making a statement, the speaker may refer to the real or the imaginary. In the latter case, the thought cannot be explicitly expressed, and consequently, denotation cannot be reached. In Frege's framework, fictional thoughts hold little significance for decision-making and actions. There­fore, we consistently seek to discern whether the discourse pertains to the real or the imagi­nary. To make this knowledge accessible, it must be incorporated into the content of a sen­tence, effectively becoming a thought. However, not every statement expresses a thought, even if it conforms to the structure of a sentence. I will now elucidate three intensionalization pro­cedures that Frege proposes for constructing a sentence that expresses a thought, even if cer­tain components within it lack denotation: the articulation of a naming relation, the formula­tion of a propositional attitude of intention, and the formulation of a propositional attitude that conveys a metafictional context. Through these methods, the speaker's intent to indicate a real or fictional object becomes a constituent of thought, i. e., the sense of the sentence. Fic­tions themselves become components of thought when they are found in an indirect context, wherein their sense serves as their denotation. When considered independently, the sense of a proper noun is an entity with a parameter that acquires a value in the specific situation where the name is employed by a particular speaker. Frege's foundational concepts are juxtaposed with certain aspects of Aristotle and Leibniz's doctrines.

Reference

Aristotle, 1937. O chastyakh zhivotnykh [About the parts of animals]. Translated by V. P. Karpov. Moscow (in Russ.).

Aristotle, 1976. Metaphysics. In: Aristotel'. Sobranie sochinenii v 4-kh tomakh [Aris­totle. Collected works in 4 volumes]. Vol. 1. Translated by A. V. Kubitski. Moscow, pp. 63—367 (in Russ.).

Aristotle, 1978a. Categories. In: Aristotel'. Sobranie sochinenii v 4-kh tomakh [Aristo­tle. Collected works in 4 volumes]. Vol. 2. Translated by A. V. Kubitski. Moscow, pp. 51—89 (in Russ.).

Aristotle, 1978b. About interpretation. In: Aristotel'. Sobranie sochinenii v 4-kh tomakh [Aristotle. Collected works in 4 volumes]. Vol. 2. Translated by E. V. Radlov. Moscow, pp. 91—115 (in Russ.).

Aristotle, 1978c. Second analytics. In: Aristotel'. Sobranie sochinenii v 4-kh tomakh [Aristotle. Collected works in 4 volumes]. Vol. 2. Translated by B. A. Focht. Moscow, pp. 255—345 (in Russ.).

Aristotle, 1981. Physics. In: Aristotel'. Sobranie sochinenii v 4-kh tomakh [Aristotle. Collected works in 4 volumes]. Vol. 3. Translated by V. P. Karpov. Moscow, pp. 59—261 (in Russ.).

Berto, F. and Nolan, D., 2021. Hyperintensionality. In: E. N. Zalta and U. Nodel­man, eds. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford. edu/entries/hyperintensionality/ [Accessed 1 March 2023].

Borg, E., 2012. Semantics without Pragmatics? In: K. Allan and K. Jaszczolt, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 513—528.

Burge, T., 1979. Sinning against Frege. Philosophical Review, 88 (3), pp. 398—432.

Caplan, B., 2020. Fregean theories of names from fiction. In: St. Biggs and H. Geirsson, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference. New York, pp. 384—396.

Chakrabarti, A., 1997. Denying existence. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

Chernoskutov, Yu. Yu., 2003. Gottlob Frege and logical tradition. In: Istoriko-lo­gicheskie issledovaniya [Investigations in the history of logic]. St. Petersburg, pp. 238—265 (in Russ.).

Church, A., 1960. Vvedenie v matematicheskuyu logiku [Introduction to mathemati­cal logic]. Translated by V. S. Chernyavskii. V. A. Uspenskii, ed. Vol. 1. Moscow (in Russ.).

Devine, Ph., 1974. The Logic of Fiction. Philosophical Studies, 26 (5/6), pp. 389—399.

Dummett, M., 1976. Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge MA, Harvard.

Dummett, M., 1981. The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. London, Duckwort.

Frege, G., 1893. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Begriffschriftlich abgeleitet. I. Band, Je­na, Verl. von Hermann Pohle.

Frege, G., 2000a. On sense and denotation. In: B. V. Biryukov and Z. A. Kuziche­va, eds. Gottlob Frege. Logika i logicheskaya semantika [Gottlob Frege. Logic and logical se­mantics]. Moscow, pp. 230—246 (in Russ.).

Frege, G., 2000b. Reasoning on sense and denotation. In: B. V. Biryukov and Z. A. Ku­zicheva, eds. Gottlob Frege. Logika i logicheskaya semantika [Gottlob Frege. Logic and logical semantics]. Moscow, pp. 247—252 (in Russ.).

Frege, G., 2000c. About concept and thing. In: B. V. Biryukov and Z. A. Kuziche­va, eds. Gottlob Frege. Logika i logicheskaya semantika [Gottlob Frege. Logic and logical semantics]. Moscow, pp. 253—262 (in Russ.).

Frege, G., 2000d. Introduction to logic. In: B. V. Biryukov and Z. A. Kuzicheva, eds. Gottlob Frege. Logika i logicheskaya semantika [Gottlob Frege. Logic and logical se­mantics]. Moscow, pp. 297—306 (in Russ.).

Frege, G., 2000e. Logic. Introduction. In: B. V. Biryukov and Z. A. Kuzicheva, eds. Gottlob Frege. Logika i logicheskaya semantika [Gottlob Frege. Logic and logical seman­tics]. Moscow, pp. 307—325 (in Russ.).

Frege, G., 2000f. Thought. Logical investigation. In: B. V. Biryukov and Z. A. Ku­zi­cheva, eds. Gottlob Frege. Logika i logicheskaya semantika [Gottlob Frege. Logic and lo­gi­cal semantics]. Moscow, pp. 326—342 (in Russ.).

Frege, G., 2000g. Osnovopolozheniya arifmetiki. Logiko-matematicheskoe issledovanie o ponyatii chisla [Foundations of arithmetic. Logical and mathematical research on the concept of number]. Translated by V. A. Surovtcev. Tomsk (in Russ.).

Heis, J., 2013. Frege, Lotze, and Boole. In: E. H. Reck, ed. The Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 113—138.

Kamp, H., 2015. Using Proper Names as Intermediaries between Labelled Entity Representations. Erkenntnis, 80 (2), pp. 263—312, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9701-2.

Kripke, S., 1979. A Puzzle about Belief. In: A. Margalit, ed. Meaning and Use. Dord­recht, pp. 239—283.

Kripke, S., 2011. Vacuous names and fictional entities. In: S. Kripke, ed. Philosophi­cal troubles. Oxford, pp. 52—74.

Lebedev, A. V., ed. 1989. Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov. Chast' 1: Ot epi­cheskikh kosmogonii do vozniknoveniya atomistiki [Fragments of early Greek Philosopher. Part 1. From epic cosmogonies to the emergence of atomistics]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Leibniz, G. W., 1984a. Reflection on knowledge, truth and ideas. In: G. W. Leib­niz, ed. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh [Papers in four volumes]. Vol. 3. Translated by E. L. Radlov. Moscow, pp. 101—107 (in Russ.).

Leibniz, G. W., 1984b. Absolutely the first truths. In: G. W. Leibniz, ed. Sochineni­ya v chetyrekh tomakh [Papers in four volumes]. Vol. 3. Translated by G. G. Mayorov. Moscow, pp. 123—126 (in Russ.).

Leibniz, G. W., 1989. Experiments of theodicy about the goodness of God, the freedom of man and the beginning of evil. In: G. W. Leibniz, ed. Sochineniya v chety­rekh tomakh [Papers in four volumes]. Vol. 4. Translated by F. A. Smirnov. Mos­cow (in Russ.).

Lenzen, W., 1995. Frege und Leibniz. In: I. Max, ed. Logik und Mathematik. Berlin, De Gruyter, pp. 82—92.

Maier, E. and Stokke, A., eds., 2021. The Language of Fiction. Oxford University Press.

Mikirtumov, I. B., 2006. Teoriya znacheniya i intensional'naya logika [Meaning theo­ry and intensional logic]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Mikirtumov, I. B., 2016. Non-compositionality and intended sense. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science], 48 (2), pp. 87—103 (in Russ.).

Miroshnichenko, P. N., 2003. Gottlob Frege i logiko-filosofskaya mysl' XIX — nachala XX veka [Gottlob Frege and logic-philosophical conceptions of 19th and early 20th centuries]. Zaporozhye (in Russ.).

Montague, R., 1981. Pragmatics and intensional logic. In: V. A. Smirnov, ed. Se­mantika modal'nykh i intensional'nykh logik [Semantics of modal und nonextesional lo­gics]. Translated V. A. Smirnov. Moscow, pp. 223—253 (in Russ.).

Moschovakis, Y., 1993. Sense and Denotation as Algorithm and Value. In: J. Oikkonen and J. Vannen, eds. Logic Colloquium’90: ASL Summer Meeting in Helsinki. Lecture Notes in Logic. Vol. 2. Heidelberg, pp. 210—249.

Munton, J., 2017. Frege, fiction and force. Synthese, 194, pp. 3669—3692, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1117-x.

Ninan, D., 2019. Naming and epistemic necessity. Noûs, 55 (2), pp. 334—362, https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12314.

Plato, 1990. Menon. In: Plato, ed. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh [Papers in four volumes]. Vol. 1. Translated by S. A. Osherov. Moscow, pp. 575—612 (in Russ.).

Recanati, F., 2021. Fictional Reference as Simulation. In: E. Maier and A. Stokke, eds. The Language of Fiction. Oxford University Press, pp. 17—36, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846376.003.0002.

Schiffer, S., 1992. Belief ascription. Journal of Philosophy, 89 (10), pp. 499—521.

Shanin, N. A., 1992. Some features of the mathematical approach to the problems of logic. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Saint Pe­tersburg University], 6 (4), pp. 10—20 (in Russ.).

Slinin, Ya. A., 2007. Aristotles’ logical semantics. Logiko-filosofskie shtudii [Logical and philosophical studies], 4, pp. 279—289 (in Russ.).