The problems of modernising research staff training: the German experience against the background of European reforms
Abstract
This article analyses, through the example of German universities, the features of reforms in the PhD education management system, which have been carried out over the last decade in European countries.
Reference
1. Boer H. de, Leisyte L., Enders J. The Netherlands — steering from a distance // Reforming university governance. Changing conditions for research in four European countries / B. Kehm, U. Lanzendorf (eds.). Bonn, 2006. P. 29—96.
2. DFG. Die zukuenftige Foerderung des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses durch die DFG. Empfehlungen der Praesidialarbeitsgruppe Nachwuchsfoerderung. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 2000. URL: www.dfg.de/aktuelles_presse/reden_stellungnahmen/ 2000/index.html. Accessed 17 Oct 2003 (дата обращения: 21.12.2010).
3. Бехман Г. Современное общество: общество риска, информаицонное общество, общество знаний. М., 2010.
4. Boer H. de, Enders J., Schimank U. On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria and Germany // New forms of governance in research organizations / D. Jansen (ed.). Dordrecht, 2007. P. 137—152.
5. Kehm B., Lanzendorf U. Germany — 16 Laender approaches to reform // Reforming university governance. Changing conditions for research in four European countries / B. Kehm, U. Lanzendorf (eds.). Bonn, 2006. P. 135—186.
6. Clark B. R. The higher education system. Academic organizations in cross-national perspective. Berkeley CA, 1983.
7. Van Vught F. A. Combining planning and the market: an analysis of the government strategy towards higher education in the Netherlands // Higher Education Policy. 1997. N 10 (3/4). P. 211—224.
8. McDaniel O. C. The paradigms of governance in higher education systems // Higher Education Policy. 1996. N 9 (2). P. 137—158.
