Current issue

Representation of the image of Kaliningrad in the names of guided city tours

DOI

10.5922/2225-5346-2022-4-11

Pages

157-170

Abstract

The article offers a qualitative content analysis of the names of Kaliningrad city tours and identifies the main distinctive features of the image of the city represented in them. The name of the tour is a message sent by the tour operator to the addressee — the potential consumer of tourist services. This type of communication is not exclusively commercial; it has an indirect impact on the accomplishment of a broader range of socially significant goals, first and foremost, the formation of a positive image of the city. The success of communication does not only depend on the fact of the purchasing of the tour but on the social context associated with the subsequent actions of the addressee. The interaction of the sender of the message and its addressee may entail a serious discrepancy between the image of the city represented in the names of tours and the image formed after visiting the city, or the image formed after the tour itself. The study has shown that such a discrepancy in the image of Kaliningrad is typical because of the dichotomy Koenigsberg — Kaliningrad, the contrast between the German past and Russian present, and the intention to represent Koenigsberg as a city that still exists. The article provides recommendations for overcoming the discrepancy problem.

Reference

Amin, E. and Thrift, N., 2002. The Intelligibility of Everyday City. Logos, 3 (34), pp. 1—25 (in Russ.).

Andreevsky, I. E., Arseniev, K. K. and Petrushevsky, O. O., eds., 1897. Entsiklo­pe­di­cheskii slovar' Brokgauza i Efrona [The Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopaedic Dictio­nary]. St. Petersburg, XXIIa (44) (in Russ.).

Clark, I. D., 2009. Naming sites: Names as management tools in indigenous tou­rism sites — An Australian case study. Tourism Management, 30 (1), pp. 109—111.

Gavrilina, L. M., 2012. Symbolic Space of Kaliningrad Text. Vestnik Tomskogo go­su­darstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya [Tomsk State University Journal of History], 2 (18), pp. 66—72 (in Russ.).

Hoppe, B., 2004. Fighting the Enemy’s Past: Konigsberg/Kaliningrad as a Place Of Memory in The Post-War Ussr. Ab Imperio, 2, pp. 237—268 (in Russ.).

Kubina, N. E., 2021. Territorial Branding Research: A Strategic Approach to Buil­ding a Region Brand. Upravlenie innovatsiyami: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya otraslei i sek­to­rov ekonomiki: sbornik nauchnykh statei po itogam III mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konfe­rentsi [Innovation Management: Challenges and Opportunities for Industries and Sec­tors of the Economy: A Collection of Scientific Articles on the Results of the III In­ternational Scientific Conference]. Kaliningrad, pp. 99—112 (in Russ.).

Light, D., 2014. Tourism and toponymy: commodifying and consuming place names. Tourism Geographies, 16 (1). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/pub lication/262579781_Tourism_and_toponymy_commodifying_and_consuming_place _names [Accessed 27 February 2022].

Lindner, R., 2008. Texture, Imaginary, Habitus: Key Concepts of Cultural Analy­sis in Urban Planning. In: Sobstvennaya logika gorodov: novye podhody v urbanistike [Own Logic of Cities: New Approaches in Urbanism]. Moscow, pp. 68—77 (in Russ.).

MacCannell, D., 1976. The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. New York: Sho­ken.

Marjavaara, R., Nilsson, R. O. and Müller, D. K., 2022. The Arctification of nor­thern tourism: a longitudinal geographical analysis of firm names in Sweden. Polar Geography, 45 (2). pp. 1—18. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/ 10.1080/1088937X.2022.2032449 [Accessed 20 February 2022].

Mitin, I. I., 2012. Mythogeography as a Theoretical Framework for City Branding. In: Brending malykh i srednikh gorodov Rossii: opyt, problemy, perspektivy [Branding of Small and Medium-sized Cities in Russia: Experience, Problems, Prospects]. Ekate­rin­burg, pp. 135—142 (in Russ.).

Prokhodskaya, M., 2019. The Problem of Finding the Meaning of the Concept "City". Gumanitarnyi aktsent [Humanitarian accent], 2, pp. 52—56 (in Russ.).

Rodkin, P., 2018. Place Branding: The Problem of Representation and Brand-Identification. Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma [Service and Tourism: Current Challenges], 12 (4), pp. 25—34 (in Russ.).

Santos, P. M., 2019. Tourism and the critical cosmopolitanism imagination: “The Worst Tours” in a European World Heritage city. International Journal of Heritage Stu­dies, 25 (9), pp. 943—957.

Sładkiewicz, Ż. R. and Wieladek, K., 2020. The intertexteme as an instrument in the past—present—future dialogical space of urbanism practices: an intersemiotic analysis of graffiti and inscriptions in Gdansk and Kaliningrad. Slovo.ru: baltic accent, 11 (1), pp. 108—133 (in Russ.).

Terskikh, M. V. and Malenova, E. D., 2015. Image of a Region: Theoretical Aspect (Russian and Foreign experience). Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics], 2, pp. 199—205 (in Russ.).

Tuan, Y.-F., 1999. Language and the Making of Place: A Narrative-Descriptive Approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81 (4), pp. 684—696.

Vasyutin, O. and Popadin, A., 2014 The Urban Palimpsest: The Urban De­ve­lop­ment Practices in the Kaliningrad Region (1945—1990). Slovo.ru: baltic accent, 1, pp. 97—123 (in Russ.).

Voznyuk, E. E., 2018. Identity and Positioning in Branding of Tourist Destina­tions: An Analysis on the Example of Lithuanian Cities. In: Voobrazhaemaya territoriya: ot ­lokal'noi identichnosti do brenda [Imaginary Territory: From Local Identity to Brand]. Moscow, pp. 10—35 (in Russ.).