Search
Submit an article RU
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2024 Vol. 15 №2

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Zakharkiv E.V.

Interfaces of Contemporary Poetry: Turn-taking and Multiple Addressing

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2024-2-6
Pages
98-111
addressing auto-addressing communication interfaces pragmatic markers poetic communication turn-taking

Abstract

The characteristic feature of contemporary poetry is an increased attention to the prag­matics of the message. The Internet influences the activation of the communication function, and metalinguistic reflection in poetry manifests itself through the violation of grammatical norms, the graphic highlighting of pragmatic markers, and the representation of computer interface elements such as messengers, social networks, etc. At the same time, the media inter­face creates a multiplicity of addressing and influences the strategies of indirect subjectivation that manifest themselves as a result of several shifts (deictic, functional, etc.), allowing us to deal with the updating of the communication parameters of a poetic utterance. This modifica­tion involves bringing the communication channel to the fore, as well as explicating the turn-taking indices in its non-conventional function. Thus, at the present stage, the poetic message is supplemented by new (linguistic and media) means, including interfaces, pseudo-dialogue models characteristic of online correspondence, conversational patterns, and discourse mark­ers used in online communication. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the functioning of pragmatic markers as indicators of subjectivity and addressing on the Internet.

Reference

Aarseth, E. J., 1997. Cybertext: perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore: John Hop­kins University Press.

Barthes, R., 1994. Author’s death. In: R. Barthes, ed. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow, pp. 384—391 (in Russ.).

Benthien, C., Lau, J. and Marxsen, M., 2019. The Literariness of Media Art. New York and London: Routledge.

Di Rosario, G., 2011. Electronic poetry. Understanding Poetry in the Digital Environ­ment. Jyväskylä.

Friedlund, A. J., 1991. Sociality of solitary smiling: Potentiation by an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (2), pp. 229—240.

Gasparov, B. M., 1996. Yazyk. Pamyat'. Obraz. Lingvistika yazykovogo sushchestvo­vaniya [Memory. Image. Linguistics of linguistic existence]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Gronlund, M., 2014. From Narcissism to the Dialogic: Identity in Art after the In­ternet. Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context, and Enquiry, 37, pp. 4—13, https://doi.org/ 10.1086/679372.

Jakobson, R., 1975. Linguistics and poetics. In: Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv»: sbornik statei [Structuralism: “pro” and “contra”: a collection of articles]. Moscow, pp. 193—230 (in Russ.).

Latur, B., 2014. Peresborka sotsial'nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu [Reas­sem­bling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Lekhtsier, V., 2020. Poeziya i ee inoe: filosofskie i literaturno-kriticheskie teksty [Poetry and its other: philosophical and literary-critical texts]. Ekaterinburg; Moscow (in Russ.).

Ma, M.-Q., 2009. The Sound Shape of the Visual: Toward a Phenomenology of an Interface. In: C. Dworkin and M. Perloff, eds. The Sound of Poetry / The Poetry of Sound. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 270—284, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/ 9780226657448.003.0020.

Vygotsky, L. S., 1999. Myshlenie i rech' [Thought and Language]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Zolyan, S. T., 1988. “I” of a poetic text: semantics and pragmatics (to the problem of lyrical hero). In: Tynyanovskiĭ sbornik. Tret'i Tynyanovskie chteniya [Tynian collec­tion. The Third Tynian readings]. Riga, pp. 24—28 (in Russ.).