Search
Submit an article RU
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2024 Vol. 15 №2

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Sokolova O.V.

New Technologies and Pragmatic Techniques in Contemporary Poetry

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2024-2-5
Pages
81-97
poetic pragmatics language functions contemporary poetry new media transcoding

Abstract

The paper examines the linguistic and communication changes taking place in poetic dis­course under the influence of new media. The digital interface (blogs, social networks, applica­tions) affects the transformation of all the parameters of communication, due to the dominance of information channels and codes. The interaction of poetic language with colloquial speech and the influence of digital technologies lead to the creation of new strategies of subjectivation and addressing in contemporary poetry, as well as to an increase in the role of poetic pragmat­ics. In addition, the process of meaning formation in contemporary poetry involves the mech­anism of transcoding, i. e. the transfer of a message from one format to another, which can take place during the conversion from a paper (or analogue) format to a digital one. Transcoding involves a change in the form and content of the message, as well as other communication parameters. The paper classifies and explores in detail the pragmatic parameters that undergo transcoding under the influence of digital technologies, acting as new pragmatic techniques of poetic utterance.

Reference

Akhapkin, D., 2012. Cognitive approach in modern studies of literary texts. No­voe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 114, pp. 298—312 (in Russ.).

Androutsopoulos, J., 2006. Introduction: Sociolinguistics andcomputer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10/4, pp. 419—438, https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1467—9841.2006.00286.x.

Apresyan, Yu. D., 1986. Deixis in vocabulary and grammar and the naive model of the world. In: Semiotika i informatika [Semiotics and computer science]. Vol. 28. Moscow, pp. 5—33 (in Russ.).

Bachmann-Medic, D., 2017. Kul'turnye povoroty. Novye orientiry v naukakh o kul'ture [Cultural turns. New landmarks in the sciences of culture]. Мoscow (in Russ.).

Bazzanella, C., 2001. Segnali discorsivi nel parlato e nello scritto. In: M. Dardano, A. Pelo and A. Stefinlongo, eds. Scritto e parlato. Metodi, testi, e contesti. Roma, pp. 79—98.

Benveniste, É., 1974. Obshchaya lingvistika [General linguistics]. Yu. S. Stepanov, ed. Moscow (in Russ.).

Bergelson, M. B., 2002. Language aspects of virtual communication. Vestnik Mos­kovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication], 1, pp. 55—67 (in Russ.).

Blakemore, D., 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragma­tics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge.

Crystal, D., 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge.

Feshchenko, V. and Sokolova, O., 2023. Visualising Deixis in Avant-Garde and Contemporary Poetry “On and Off the Page”. In: M. E. Korecka and W. Vorrath, eds. Poetry and Contemporary Visual Culture / Lyrik und zeitgenössische Visuelle Kultur. Ber­lin; Boston, pp. 49—72, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111299334-003.

Feshchenko, V. V., 2022. Yazyk v yazyke. Khudozhestvennyi diskurs i osnovaniya ling­voestetiki [Language within language. Artistic discourse and the foundations of lin­guistic aesthetics]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Jakobson, R., 1975. Linguistics and poetics. In: Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv»: sbor­nik statei [Structuralism: “pro” and “contra”: a collection of articles]. Moscow, pp. 193—230 (in Russ.).

Kibrik, A. A., 2009. Mode, genre and other parameters of discourse classification. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Topics in the study of language], 2, pp. 3—21 (in Russ.).

Krongauz, M. A., 2013. Samouchitel' olbanskogo [Self-help guide of Olbansky]. Mos­cow (in Russ.).

Lyons, J., 1977. Semantics. Cambridge.

Manovich, L., 2018. Yazyk novykh media [The Language of New Media]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Ong, W. J., 1982. Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. London; New York.

Paducheva, E. V., 2009. Interpretation mode as a context that removes ambiguity. In: Lingvistika dlya vsekh. Letnie lingvisticheskie shkoly 2007 i 2008 [Linguistics for eve­ryone. Summer linguistic schools 2007 and 2008]. Moscow, pp. 234—246 (in Russ.).

Para, Iu., 2016. Online Communication — Netspeak. In: D. Dejica, G. Hansen, P. Sandrini and Iu. Para, eds. Language in the Digital Era. Challenges and Perspectives. Warsaw, pp. 189—200, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472059-017.

Radbil, T. B., 2012. Yazykovye anomalii v khudozhestvennom tekste: Andrey Platonov i drugie [Language anomalies in a literary text: Andrey Platonov and others]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Sokolova, O. V., 2023. Transcoding in Contemporary Poetry: Visual and Audial Translatability. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 181, pp. 173—187, https://doi.org/10.53953/08696365_2023_181_3_173 (in Russ.).

Tsvigun, T. and Chernyakov, A., 2023. The Neural Poetry of Grammar and the Neural Grammar of Poetry. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 181, pp. 188—199, https://doi.org/10.53953/08696365_2023_181_3_188 (in Russ.).

Zakharkiv, E. V., 2020. Verbal aggression in modern poetry: conventional and unconventional functioning of discourse markers. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 11 (4), pp. 15—27, https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2020-4-2 (in Russ.).

Zolyan, S. T., 2014. Semantika i struktura poeticheskogo teksta [Semantics and struc­ture of poetic text]. Moscow (in Russ.).