Search
Submit an article RU
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2023 Vol. 14 №1

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Chernyavskaya V.E.

“They call the main entrance a porch”: social meaning in semantics and metapragmatics

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2023-1-5
Pages
72-85
social meaning social index sociolinguistics metapragmatics

Abstract

The paper analyzes the concept of social meaning, which has been conceptualized in lexi­cal semantics since the 1980s and has become central in modern sociolinguistics and linguis­tic anthropology. It has been used to describe pragmatic increments in the meaning of a lan­guage unit, which it receives in context. New explanatory approaches have developed from a sociolinguistic perspective in metapragmatics, where social meaning is seen as a social index that emerges in context. Social index (the index meaning of a sign) refers to typified social situations and social roles of participants of a communicative act. Social meaning is actual­ized when it can be interpreted in social interaction as being used to express certain connota­tions. This analytical review presents a contemporary conceptual apparatus and toolkit that enables linguists to describe the social perspective in constructing meaning and interpreting meaning formation in social contexts. The empirical material for the analysis reflects the con­temporary sociocultural and discourse practices using the example of linguistic variability in Russian. The analysis of the Russian nouns “paradnaya” and “pod’ezd” shows how a lan­guage sign acquires a stable indexical character and is used to express social attribution.

Reference

Beliaeva, L. N. and Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2016. Evidence-based linguistics: meth­ods in cognitive paradigm. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Lin­guistics], 3, pp. 77—84, https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2016-3-77-84 (in Russ.).

Beltrama, A., 2020. Social meaning in semantics and pragmatics. Language and Lin­guistics Compass, 14 (9), pp. 1—20, https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12398.

Blommaert, J., 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge.

Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2018. Lingvistika teksta. Lingvistika diskursa [Text Linguis­tics. Discourse Linguistics]. Мoscow (in Russ.).

Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2020. Metapragmatics: When the author brings meaning and the addressee context. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Yazyk i Literatura [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature], 17 (1), pp. 135—147, https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2020.109 (in Russ.).

Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2021a. Social meaning in the mirror of political correctness. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Yazyk i Literatura [Vestnik of Saint Peters­burg University. Language and Literature], 18 (2), pp. 383—399, https://doi.org/ 10.21638/spbu09.2021.208 (in Russ.).

Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2021b. Tekst i sotsial’nyi kontekst: Sotsiolingvisticheskii i dis­kur­sivnyi analiz smysloporozhdeniya [Text and social context: Sociolinguistic and dis­cur­sive analysis of meaning generation] (in Russ.).

Eckert, P. and Labov, W., 2017. Phonetics, phonology and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21 (4), pp. 467—496, https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12244.

Eckert, P., 2018. Meaning and Linguistic Variation: The Third Wave in Sociolinguis­tics. Cambridge University Press.

Labov, W., 1972. Sociolinguistic Pattern. Oxford.

Leech, G., 1981. Semantics. The Study of Meaning. Harmondsworth.

Löbner, S., 2002. Understanding Semantics. Routledge.

Lucy, J. A., 1993. Reflexive language and the human disciplines. In: J. A. Lucy, ed. Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge, pp. 9—32.

Mertz, E. and Yovel, J., 2009. Metalinguistic awareness. In: S. Dominiek, J. Öst­man and J. Verschueren, eds. Cognition and Pragmatics. Amsterdam, pp. 250—271.

Molodychenko, E. N. and Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2022. Representing the social through language: Theory and practice of sociolinguistics and discourse analysis. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Yazyk i Literatura [Vestnik of Saint Peters­burg University. Language and Literature], 19 (1), pp. 103—124, https://doi.org/ 10.21638/spbu09.2022.106 (in Russ.).

Molodychenko, E. N., 2020. Metasemiotic Projectsand Lifestyle Media: Formula­ting Commodities as Resources for Identity Enactment. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 24 (1), pp. 117—136, https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-1-117-136 (in Russ.).

Molodychenko, E. N., 2021. Metapragmatic discourses in differentiating genres in online media. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Yazyk i Literatura [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature], 18 (2), pp. 363—382, https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2021.207 (in Russ.).

Molodychenko, E. N., 2022a. Integrating metapragmatics into genre analysis: Does the analytical toolkit need an upgrade in the digital era? Vestnik Tomskogo gosu­darstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philology], 75, pp. 67—93, https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/75/4 (in Russ.).

Molodychenko, E. N., 2022b. Identity, style, and styling: a sociolinguistic per­spective. Terra Linguistica, 2 (13), pp. 11—29, https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.13202 (in Russ.).

Silverstein, M., 1993. Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function. In: J. Lucy, ed. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge, pp. 33—58.

Silverstein, M., 2001. The Limits of Awareness. In: A. Duranti, ed. Linguistic Anthro­pology: A Reader. Oxford, pp. 386—401.

Silverstein, M., 2014. Denotation and the Pragmatics of Language. In: The Cam­bridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge, pp. 128—157.

Vasilieva, Ju. A. and Zolotykh, L. G., 2015. Linguistic-cultural type «Petersburg­er» of Russian Linguistic Mentality. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Humanitarian Re­searches], 2 (54), pp. 48—63 (in Russ.)

Verschueren, J., 2000. Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics, 10, pp. 439—456.