Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2020 Vol. 11 №4

Back to the list Download an article

Speech behaviour of Internet users in conflict communication

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2020-4-4
Pages
45-57

Abstract

This article explores the expression of impoliteness of Internet users in confrontational threads. This approach involves the identification of speech aggression markers typical of a certain type of discourse. This makes it possible to define the roles and attitudes of partici­pants in the conflict interaction. The authors employed methods of discourse analysis and corpus tools of data collection and marking. Seven confrontational threads in the communities of the social network "Vkontakte" were analysed. The authors identified language markers of the switch from cooperative to confrontational speech interaction. The authors investigated the typical roles of communicators in a confrontational thread, and observed the dynamics of using aggressive language tools for each of the proposed strategies. The article describes typi­cal situations for the confrontational threads: reliability of the information presented, lack of the user's intention to check facts, and the violation of spelling and punctuation rules. Con­frontations around these situations tend to lead to more complex conflicts and are character­ized as motives typical of impolite communication.

Reference

  1. Apresyan, V.Yu., 2003. Implicit aggression in language. In:  Computational Lin­guistics and Intellectual Technologies, Po materialam ezhegodnoi mezhdunarodnoi kon­ferentsii «Dialog» (2003) [Papers from the Annual International Conference “Dia­logue” (2003)]. Moscow. pp. 32—35 (in Russ.).

  2. Gulakova, I. I., 2004. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki rechevogo povedeniya v kon­fliktnoi situatsii obshcheniya [Communication strategies and tactics of speech behavior in a conflict communication situation]. Ph. D. Orlov State University (in Russ.).

  3. Leont'ev, V. V., 2001. Speech teasing in Russian and English lingvocultures. Zhanry rechi [Speech Genres], 2, pp. 119—126 (in Russ.).

  4. Lorents, K., 2001. Agressiya [Agression]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

  5. Rudneva, E. A., 2019. Strategii lingvisticheskoi vezhlivosti v spontannom rechevom vzaimodeistvii [Strategies of linguistic politeness in spontaneous speech interaction]. Ph. D. Institute of Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russ.).

  6. Culpeper, J., 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge.

  7. Lakoff, R. T., 1973. The logic of politeness or minding your P’s and Q’s. In: Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago.

  8. Leech, G., 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. New York.

  9. Liu, B., 2012. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion. Mining. Morgan and Claypool.

  10. Seargeant, P. and Tagg, C., eds., 2014. The language of social media: Identity and community on the Internet. London.

  11. Terkourafi, M., 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness and rudeness. In: D. Bousfield and M. Locher, eds. Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin. pp. 45—74.