Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2020 Vol. 11 № 3

Back to the list Download an article

The concept “people” in the Cadet Party rhetoric

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2020-3-6
Pages
85-98

Abstract

The article considers the interpretation of the concept “people” by the Constitutional Democratic Party supporters. This concept is of fundamental importance for the analysis of Cadet ideology. The concept “people” was of great political value for the Cadet party. The author correlates this concept with such notions relevant for the Party as society, nation, and nationality. The author examines the relations of “people” with the authorities, the state, the Cadet Party, the Parliament, and humanity. Special attention is paid to the evolution of ca­dets’ understanding of the concept “people” in connection with social processes, the develop­ment of the political crisis and revolutions of 1905—1907 and 1917. The author holds that already at the beginning of the revolutionary period, the Cadets substituted the triad “author­ity — society — people”, which was conservative in origin by the dichotomy “power — peo­ple”, which was democratic in nature. The “people” included the educated public and was opposed to the “authorities”. In its new meaning, “people” was seen as the “third class”, the future civil nation, called to construct a political system based on the idea of popular sover­eignty. In this sense, the Cadet ideology was revolutionary and implied a break from the An­cien régime. The “people” were not considered as some unique whole but rather as an integral part of humanity, developing together with it according to universal laws. The Cadet Party was considered by its supporters as a force representing the interests of the entire “people.” Cadet faction in the State Duma turned it into a popular representation. Although only the Constituent Assembly convened on the basis of universal suffrage can be considered to be a truly democratic representation. Broad democratization during the February Revolution cor­responded to the Cadet concept of people sovereignty. Moreover, the Cadets had no ideological grounds to oppose the further radicalization of the revolution.

Reference

Kazakova, N., ed., 1991. Vekhi; Intelligentsiya v Rossii: Sb. st. 1909—1910 [Mile­stones; The intelligentsia in Russia: Collection of articles 1909—1910]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Gayda, F. A., 2015. “If only our teachers spoke more about Russia...” The youth­ful years of future cadet leaders]. Rodina [Homeland], 2, pp. 100—102 (in Russ.).
The State Duma, 1915. Gosudarstvennaya duma. Sozyv IV. Sessiya IV. Stenografich­eskie otchety. [The State Duma. Convocation IV. Session IV. Shorthand reports]. Vol. 1. Petrograd (in Russ.).
The State Duma, 1916. Gosudarstvennaya duma. Sozyv IV. Sessiya V. Stenografiches­kie otchety. [The State Duma. Convocation IV. Session V. Shorthand reports]. Vol. 1. Petrograd (in Russ.).
Izgoev, A., 1911. Political life of Russia. Russkaya mysl’ [Russian thought], 4 (3), pp. 2—6 (in Russ.).
Shelokhaev, V. V., ed., 2001. Liberal’noe dvizhenie v Rossii. 1902—1905 gg. [The lib­eral movement in Russia. 1902—1905]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Maklakov, V. A., 1936. Vlast’ i obshchestvennost’ na zakate staroi Rossii (vospomina­niya sovremennika) [Power and the public at sunset of old Russia (contemporary me­mo­ries)]. Paris (in Russ.).
Milyukov, P. N., 1901. Ocherki po istorii russkoi kul’tury [Essays on the history of Russian culture]. Vol. 3 (1). St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
Milyukov, P. N., 1907. God bor’by. Publitsisticheskaya khronika. 1905—1906 [Year of struggle. Journalistic chronicle. 1905—1906]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
Milyukov, P. N., 1916. The objectives of the war. Ezhegodnik gazety «Rech’» na 1916 god [Yearbook of the Rech newspaper for 1916], pp. 29—128 (in Russ.).
Milyukov, P. N., 1921. Istoriya vtoroi russkoi revolyutsii [The history of the second Russian revolution]. Vol. 1 (1). Sofia (in Russ.).
Obolenskii, V. A., 1988. Moya zhizn’, moi sovremenniki [My life, my contempora­ries]. Paris (in Russ.).
Petrunkevich, I. I. Iz zapisok obshchestvennogo deyatelya [From the memoirs of the public fugure]. In: Gessen, I. V., ed., 1993. Arkhiv russkoi revolyutsii [Archive of the Russian revolution]. Vol. 11 (21). Moscow (in Russ.).
Kolerov, M. A., ed., 2018. Problemy idealizma (1902) [The problems of idealism (1902)]. Vol. 2. Moscow (in Russ.).
Shelokhaev, V. V., ed., 1998. Protokoly TsK i zagranichnykh grupp konstitutsionno-demokraticheskoi partii. V 6 t. [Protocols of the Central Committee and foreign groups of the Constitutional democratic party. In 6 volumes]. Vol. 3. Moscow (in Russ.).
Pavlov, D. B. and Shelokhaev, V. V., ed., 1996. Rossiiskie liberaly: kadety i ok­tyab­risty: Dokumenty, vospominaniya, publitsistika [Russian Liberals: Cadets and Octo­brists: Do­cuments, Memoirs, Journalism]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Seleznev, F. A., 2006. Konstitutsionnye demokraty i burzhuaziya (1905—1917 gg.) [Constitutional democrats and the bourgeoisie (1905—1917)]. Nizhny Novgorod (in Russ.).
Shelokhaev, V. V., ed., 2000. S’ezdy i konferentsii konstitutsionno-demokraticheskoi partii. V 3 t. [Congresses and conferences of the Constitutional democratic party. In 3 vo­lumes]. Vol. 3 (1). Moscow (in Russ.).
Tyrkova-Williams, A. V., 1998. To, chego bol’she ne budet [That which will no long­er be]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Shakhovskoi, D. I., 2002. Izbrannye stat’i i pis’ma. 1881—1895 [Selected articles and let­ters. 1881—1895]. Moscow (in Russ.).