Search
Submit an article RU
Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2019 Vol. 10 №2

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Sladkevich Zh. R.

The media image of San Escobar in the space of fictional worlds: a socio-semiotic perspective

Abstract

The article deals with the process of structuring the concept of the fictitious state of San Escobar from the perspective of social semiotics, including the broadly understood context and media environment for constructing the image. The creation of the internet memes was in­spired by a lapsus linguae of the Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs Witold Waszczykowski. Major changes in the communicative space, the dominance of digital media resources and multimodal messages, the hegemony of visual culture and the increased impact of the social factor on the specifics of linguistic transformations contribute to the growing popularity of social semiotic studies. In the theoretical part of the paper, I give a brief analysis of the evolu­tion of the concept of "context" in linguistics from the perspective of systemic functional gram­mar, cognitivism, social semiotics and multimodal discourse analysis. The analytical part of the article explores the constructed media image of the fictitious state of San Escobar through the prism of the following contexts: situational-medial, cultural-cognitive, linguistic, inten­tional and socio-economic. Summing up the specifics of the formation of meaning in narrative social practices, I draw conclusions about the recontextualization of Mikhail Bakhtin's ideas concerning the polyphonic nature of language and communication.

Reference

Ageyeva, R. A., 1990. Strany i narody: Proiskhozhdeniye nazvaniy [Countries and Peop­les: Origin of Names]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Ayzenberg, M., 1997. Power of darkness quotes. Znamya [Banner], 2, pp. 214—221 (in Russ.).

Arutyunova, N. D., 1990. Discourse. In: V. N. Yarceva, ed. Lingvisticheskij enciklo­pe­dicheskij slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow. pp. 136—137 (in Russ.).

Bakhtin, M. M., 1986. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativi­ty]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Belovodskaya, А., 2016. On the issue of the media image analysis methodology (on the example of the corpus of Internet memes expressing the Putin media-con­cept). Przegląd Rusycystyczny, 4 (156), pp. 118—131 (in Russ.).

Bershidskiy, L., 2013. Moskva pokhozha na Mordor, Ukraina — na stranu hobbitov [Moscow is like Mordor, Ukraine is like a hobbit country]. Available at: https:// 
censor.net.ua/resonance/240801/moskva_pohoja_na_mordor_ukraina_na_stranu_ hobbitov [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).

Bochkareva, N., 2016. 4 strany, kotorye ne sushchestvujut [4 countries that do not exist]. Available at: http://fb.ru/post/destinations/2016/2/8/4077 [Accessed 19 Au­gust 2018] (in Russ.).

Verbitskiy, А. А., 1990. Aktivnoe obuchenie v szkole: kontekstnyj podkhod [Active schooling: a contextual approach]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Vinogradov, V. V., 1977. The main types of lexical meanings of the word. In: Lek­si­kologiya I leksikografiya. Izbr. trudy [Lexicology and lexicography. Fav. works]. Mos­cow (in Russ.).

Galinskaya, T., 2013. The concept of the media image and the problem of its re­con­struction in modern linguistics. Vestkik OGU [Bulletin of OGU], 11(160), pp. 91—94 (in Russ.).

Glinka, K., Teoriya yumora [Theory of Humor]. Available at: https://scorcher.ru/neuro/neuro_sys/laughter/laughter5.php [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).

El'mslev, L., 1960. Prolegomena to the theory of language. Novoe v lingvistike [New in linguistics], 1 (in Russ.).

El'nitskii, L. A., 1962. Drevneishie okeanskie plavaniya [The oldest ocean swim­ming]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Zheltukhina, M. R., 2000. Komicheskoye v politicheskom diskurse (na materiale ne­me­ckogo I russkogo yazykov) [Comic in political discourse (on the material of German and Russian languages)]: Ph. D. Volgograd State Pedagogical University (in Russ.).

Zagibalova, M. A., 2008. Phenomen karnavalizacii sovremennoj kultury [The phe­no­menon of carnivalization of modern culture]: PhD. Tula State Pedagogical University (in Russ.).

Zalevskaya, A. A., 1999. Vvedenie v psikholingvistiku [Introduction to Psycholingui­stics]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Zerchaninova, T. Ye., 2006. Sociologiya. Slovar’ [Sociology. Vocabulary]. Ekaterin­burg, Available at: http://voluntary.ru/dictionary/1107 [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).

Ilyin, M. V., 2016. What can an analysis of performatives give? Politicheskaya nau­ka [Political science], 4. pp. 262—270 (in Russ.).

Ionov, A., 2018. Putevoditel’ po vymyshlennym stranam Marvel: Vakanda, Latveriya, da­lee vezde [Marvel fictional countries guide: Wakanda, Latteria, then everywhere]. Available at: https://www.mirf.ru/worlds/marvel-strany-wakanda-latveria [Acces­sed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).

Kwyat, A., 2013. Mediam as an instrument of political PR: cognitive approach. Rek­lama i PR [Advertising and PR], 1. Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/ node/1254 [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).

Knyazev, А. А., 2002. Enciklopedicheskiy slovar’ SMI [Encyclopedic dictionary of media]. Moscow. Available at: http://voluntary.ru/dictionary/1105/word/kontekst [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).

Kondratov, A. M., 1987. Atlantidy pyati okeanov [Atlantis of the Five Oceans]. Lenin­grad (in Russ.).

Kondratov, A. M., 1988. Atlantidy ishchite na shel’fe [Atlantis look on the shelf]. Le­ningrad (in Russ.).

Konopleva, T. V., 2013. Psychology of information perception: perception of news about the world of politics in the media space. Psikholog [Psychologist], 5. Available at: http://e-notabene.ru/psp/article_9247.html#8 [Accessed 19 August 2018] (in Russ.).

Kubryakova, Ye. S., 1995. The evolution of linguistic ideas in the second half of the XX century. In: Yu. S. Stepanov, ed. Yazyk i kultura konca XX veka [Language and cul­ture of the end of the XX century]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Lakoff, G., 1988. Thinking in the mirror of classifiers. Novoe v zarubezhnoj ling­vistike [New in foreign linguistics], 23, pp. 12—52 (in Russ.).

Losev, A. F., 1982. Znak. Simvol. Mif [Sign. Symbol. Myth]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Maslova, V. A., 2008. Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. Minsk (in Russ.).

Mozhejko, M. A., 2001. Context. In: Novejshij philosiphskij slovar’ [Newest Philo­sophical Dictionary]. Minsk (in Russ.).

Morton, A. L., 1956. Anglijskaya utopiya [English utopia]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Myrkin, V. Ya., 1978. Types of contexts. Communicative context. Philologicheskiye nau­ki [Philology], 1, pp. 95—100 (in Russ.).

Panina, M. A., 1996. Komicheskoe i yazykovye sredstva yego vyrazheniya [Comic and language means of expression]. PhD. Moscow State Linguistic University (in Russ.).

Propp, V. Ya., 1986. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoj skazki [The historical roots of the fairy tale]. Leningrad (in Russ.).

Sladkevich, Zh., 2018. I will not say anything, but again I will say something: the aber­ration content of public discourse from the perspective of meaning generation (ca­tegories of meaningfulness and meaninglessness). In: Zh. Sladkevich, A. Klim­ke­vich, eds. Perswazja językowa w różnych dyskursach. Vol. 3. Gdańsk (in print) (in Russ.).

Khimik, V. V., 2004. Bolshoj slovar’ russkoj ekspressivnoj razgovornoj rechi [Large dic­tionary of Russian colloquial expressive speech]. St. Petersburg, Available at: http:// www.philology.ru/linguistics2/khimik-04.htm [Accessed 01 febrary 2017] (in Russ.).

Chernyavskaya, V. Ye., 2003. Discourse. In: M. N. Kozhina, ed. Stilisticheskij enci­klopedicheskij slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Shejgal, Ye. I., 2004. Semiotika politicheskogo duskursa [Semiotics of political disco­ur­se]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Yarceva, V. N., 2002. Lingvisticheskij enciklopedicheskij slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclope­dic Dictionary]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Awdiejew, A., Habrajska, G., 2004. Wprowadzenie do gramatyki komunikacyjnej. Vol. 1. Łask.

Badyda, E., Warda-Radys, L., 2017. Santo Subito, Bimberro Grande i Pico de Waszczykowski (2017 m) — wykreowany w przestrzeni Internetu fikcyjny kraj San Es­cobar (wpływ kontekstu na strukturę pojęcia). In: Media, biznes, kultura. Dzien­ni­kar­stwo i komunikacja społeczna. pp. 93—106.

Bartmiński, J., 2001. O językowym obrazie świata Polaków końca XX wieku. In: S. Du­bisz and S. Gajda, eds. Polszczyzna XX wieku. Ewolucja i perspektywy rozwoju. Warszawa. pp. 27—53.

Duszak, A., 2014. Dyskurs w badaniach kontekstu społecznego. In: P. Stalmas­zczyk and P. Cap, eds. Pragmatyka, retoryka, argumentacja. Obrazy języka i dyskursu w naukach humanistycznych. Kraków. pp. 227—244.

Eggins, S., Martin, J., 2001 (1997). Gatunki I rejestry dyskursu. In: T. van Dijk, ed. Dys­kurs jako struktura i proces. Warszawa, pp. 24—39.

Fairclough, N., 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. Lon­don.

Fairclough, N., 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. Lon­don.

Fairclough, N., 1989. Language and Power. London.

Grice, P., 1975. Logic and Conversation. In: P. Cole, J. Morgan, eds. Speech Acts. Syn­tax and Semantics. New York. pp. 41—58.

Halliday, M. A. K., 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London.

Halliday, M. A. K., 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic. The social interpretation of Lan­guage and Meaning. London.

Halliday, M. A. K., 1967. Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Journal of Linguistics, 3, pp. 50—77.

Hintikka, J., 1992. Eseje logiko-filozoficzne. Warszawa.

Iedema, R., 2003. Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Dis­course as Multi-Semiotic Practice. Visual Communication, 2 (1). pp. 14—26.

Kiklewicz, A., 2012. Czwarte królestwo. Język a kontekst w dyskursach współczesności. Warszawa.

Kress, G., 2010. Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communi­cation. London — New York.

Kress, G., Leeuwen, van T., 2001. Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of con­temporary communication. London.

Maćkiewicz, J., 1999. Kategoryzacja a językowy obraz świata. In: J. Bartmiński, ed. Językowy obraz świata 12. Lublin. pp. 47—55.

Maćkiewicz, J., 2016. Jak można badać komunikację medialną? — perspektywa odbiorcy. Studia Medioznawcze, 2, pp. 25—35.

Martin, J., 1992. English Text. Amsterdam.

McLuhan, M., 2001. Galaktyka Gutenberga. In: Wybór tekstów. Poznań.

Searle, J., 2010. Making the Social World. Oxford.

Searle, J., 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay of the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge.

Searle, J., 1995. The construction of social reality. New York.

Sieńko, A., 2017. Polskie firmy oszalały na punkcie San Escobar. Ich pomysły zadzi­wiają kreatywnością. Available at: http://innpoland.pl/132213,polskie-firmy-oszalaly- na-punkcie-san-escobar-ich-pomysly-zadziwiaja-kreatywnoscia [Accessed 20 June 2018].

Skudrzyk, А., 2005. Czy zmierzch kultury pisma? O synestezji i analfabetyzmie funk­cjo­nalnym. Katowice.

Słobodzian, M., Globalizacja — szansa czy konieczność? Available at: http://www. edukacja.edux.pl/p-10757-globalizacja-szansa-czy-koniecznosc.php [Accessed 04 Ap­ril 2018].

Szpunar, M., 2010. Nowe media a paradygmat kultury uczestnictwa. In: M. Gras­zewicz, J. Jastrzębski, eds. Teorie komunikacji i mediów 2. Wrocław. pp. 251—262.

Szczerek, Z., 2017. Niech żyje San Escobar! Między Molvanią a San Sombrero. Avail­able at: https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/swiat/1690342,1,niech-zyje-san- escobar.read [Accessed 19 June 2018].

Taylor, A., 2017. San Escobar: How Poland’s foreign minister helped create a fa­ke country. Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ worldviews/wp/2017/01/11/san-escobar-how-polands-foreign-minister-helped-crea te-a-fake-country/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.60f54f8bd5e8 [Accessed 22 June 2018].

van Dijk, T., 2008. Discourse and Context. Cambridge.

van Dijk, T., 1980. Macrostructures. New York.

van Dijk, T., 2009. Society and Discourse. How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge.

van Leeuwen, T., 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London — New York.

Wang, W., Liu, W., 2015. Critical Discourse Analysis of New Reports on China’s Bullet-Train Crash. Studies in Literature and Language, 10(2), pp. 1—8.

Wikariak, S., 2017. San Escobar już nie dla wszystkich. Trwa walkę o markę. Available at: http://gospodarka.dziennik.pl/news/artykuly/545460,san-escobar-marka-patent- [Accessed 23 June 2018].

Zwierzchowski, M., 2017. San Escobar — Waszczykowski odkrył nowy kraj, internet os­zalał. Available at: https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/ludzieistyle/1690154, 1,san-escobar--waszczykowski-odkryl-nowy-kraj-internet-oszalal.read [Accessed 19 June 2018].