Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2018 Vol. 9 № 4

Back to the list Download an article

The rhetoric and logic of the representations of the Russian-Turkish War of 1877–1878 in Russian public discourse

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2018-4-6
Pages
63-77

Abstract

The Balkan crisis of 1875—1876 and the ensuing Russo-Turkish war of 1877—1878 were the first major foreign policy challenges for the Russian Empire in the entirely new public sphere situation. The military reform of 1784, which replaced recruitment with conscription, translated in the involvement of the general public in the current events. The new public sphere, which had been developing from the 1850s, required new languages both to describe and to transform reality, as well as to produce a collective action. The tremendous public excitement, which spread across the most diverse strata of the Russian Empire in 1876—1877, was indicative of an effective mobilisation rhetoric. However, the disappointment, which quickly followed, and the devaluation of the events of those years by public opinion suggest that, although sanctioned by the authorities, the language of mobilisation was not effectively controlled by them. In this article, I analyse the structure of the public language of 1876— 1877, which was shaped by different actors who used it to express their attitudes to the current events. I identify a series of principal oppositions employed by most actors. I analyse these oppositions from the perspective of orientalism and demonstrate that an orientalist vision of the conflict was instrumental in ‘Westernising’ the image of the Russian Empire. The critics of this model placed both parties of the conflict in a common oriental framework but did not equate them. Self-orientalisation was viewed as a political challenge that required Westernisation, which did not apply to the other party to the conflict that represented the Orient proper. The political authorities of the Russian Empire could not retain control over the broad rhetorical framework that they created. The awareness of these problems was a factor of the qualitative changes in the official rhetoric of the regime that took place in the 1880s.

Reference

Aksakova, V. S., 2013. Dnevnik. Pis'ma [Diary. Letters]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
Vazov, V. S., 1985. Pod igom [Under the yoke]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Velizhev, M. B., 2018. Chaadaev protiv natsionalizma [Chaadaev against nationalism]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Vereshchagin, V. V., 1898. Na voine v Azii i Evrope. S risunkami Khudozhnika V. V. Vereshchagina [On the war in Asia and Europe. With drawings Artist V. V. Vereshchagin]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Guzikova, M. V., 2004. «Total'naya mobilizatsiya» Ernsta Yungera kak proekt modernosti: istoricheskaya rekonstruktsiya i interpretatsiya [“Total Mobilization” by Ernst Jünger as a project of modernity: historical reconstruction and interpretation]. Ph. D. Ekaterinburg (in Russ.).
Dmitriev, A. P., Fedorov, D. A., 2016. Krymskaya voina v istorii Rossii i v zhizni slavyanofil'skogo semeistva: Perepiska Very Aksakovoi i Marii Kartashevskoi (1853—1856) [The Crimean War in the history of Russia and in the life of the Slavophil family: Correspondence between Vera Aksakova and Maria Kartashevskaya (1853—1856)]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
Dragomanov, M. P., 1876. Turki vnutrennie i vneshnie: Pis'mo k izdatelyu “Novogo vremeni” [Turks internal and external: Letter to the publisher of “New Time”]. Genève: Bale; Lyon: H. Georg (in Russ.).
Kitaev, V. A., 2004. Liberal'naya mysl' v Rossii (1860—1880 gg.) [Liberal Thought in Russia (1860—1880)]. Saratov (in Russ.).
Konstantinov, A., 1979. Izbrannoe [Favorites]. Moscow (in Russ.). Kozhina, E. F., 1969. Romanticheskaya bitva: Ocherki frantsuzskoi romanticheskoi zhivopisi 1820-kh godov [Romantic Battle: Essays on French Romantic Painting of the 1820s]. Leningrad (in Russ.).
Nemirovich-Danchenko, V. I., 1902. Plevna i Shipka. Roman v dvukh chastyakh. Iz sobytii poslednei voiny [Pleven and Shipka. A novel in two parts. From the events of the last war]. Vol. 4. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
Milevsky, O. A., Panchenko, A. B., 2017. «Bespokoinyi Klements»: Opyt intellektual'noi biografii [“Restless Clementz”: The Experience of Intellectual Biography]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Polunov, A.Yu., 2010. K. P. Pobedonostsev v obshchestvenno-politicheskoi i dukhovnoi zhizni Rossii [K.P Pobedonostsev in the socio-political and spiritual life of Russia]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Safronova, Yu., 2014. Russkoe obshchestvo v zerkale revolyutsionnogo terrora. 1879—1881 gody [Russian society in the mirror of revolutionary terror. 1879—1881 years]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Teslya, A. A., 2018. “The only pictures in memory of the glorious war”: heroic, orientalism and the problems of the pictorial representation of the Russian-Turkish war of 1877—1878. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological review], 17(3) [in Russ., in press].
Teslya, A. A., 2017. Who says and who (should) be heard: “public opinion” in the Russian Empire of the 2nd half of the XIX century. In: M. G. Pugacheva, V. P. Zharkova, eds. Puti Rossii. Voina i mir: Sbornik statei [Ways of Russia. War and Peace: Collection of articles]. Vol. XXII. Moscow, pp. 93—109 (in Russ.).
Teslya, A. A., 2017a. Russian Conservative: On the System of Political Views of K. P. Pobedonostsev of the 1870—1890s. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Sociological review], 16(1), pp. 151—172 (in Russ.).
Teslya, A. A., 2015. Poslednii iz “ottsov”»: Biografiya Ivana Aksakova [The Last of the “Fathers”: Biography of Ivan Aksakov]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.). 
Wortman, P., 2004. Stsenarii vlasti. Mify i tseremonii russkoi monarkhii [Scenarios of power. Myths and ceremonies of the Russian monarchy]. Vol. 2. Moscow (in Russ.). 
Junger, E., 2002. Total mobilization. In: E. Junger, ed. Gospodstvo i geshtal't [Domination and gestalt]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
Berlin, I., 1969. Two Concepts of Liberty. In: Berlin I. Four Essays on Liberty. London, Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 121—172.