Baltic accent

2018 Vol. 9 №4

Back to the list Download the article

The paradox of the ‘semiotics of life’: Yuri Lotman’s later works



In a series of interviews given in the early 1990s, Yuri Lotman contemplated the boundary between the human and the animal. Keenly interested in animals, the scholar stressed in his later work the need to include animal communication in the semiosphere. Lotman’s model holds that semiosis requires at least two languages between which instances of untranslatability occur. However, he did not extend this model to animal communication. This is the apparent paradox of Lotman’s later work. Lotman might not have had enough time to think these problems through, although these issues had been addressed earlier by other authors. The problem of the relationship between cyclicality and openness, the old and the new, repetitions and novelty, the algoritmicity and non-algoritmicity as aspects of semiosis and of each act of interpretations has not been sufficiently investigated. Therefore, Lotman’s later work deserves attention today.


Avtonomova, N. S., 2014. Pozdnij Lotman [Late Lotman]. In: N. S. Avtonomova. Otkrytaya struktura: Yakobson — Bakhtin — Lotman — Gasparov [Open Structure: Jacobson — Bakhtin — Lotman — Gasparov]. Moscow, pp. 219—227 (in Russ.).
Lotman, Yu. M., 1998. Lyudi i znaki [People and signs]. In: Vyshgorod, 3, pp. 133—138 (in Russ.).
Lotman, Yu. M., 1992. Kul'tura i vzryv [Culture and explosion]. Moscow (in Russ.).
Lotman, Yu. M., 2010. Nepredskazuemye mekhanizmy kul'tury [Unpredictable culture mechanisms]. Tallinn (in Russ.).
Salupere, S., 2017. O metayazyke Yuriya Lotmana: problemy, kontekst, istochniki [On the metalanguage of Yuri Lotman: problems, context, sources]. Ph. D. University of Tartu (in Russ.).
Chernov, I. A., 1997. Opyt vvedenija v sistemu Yu. M. Lotmana [Introduction experience to the system by Yu. M. Lotman]. In: Yu. M. Lotman. O russkoi literature:
Stat'i i issledovaniya (1958—1993) [On Russian literature: Articles and studies (1958—1993)]. St. Petersburg, pp. 5—13 (in Russ.).
Deacon, T. W., 1997. The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: W. W. Norton. 
Hoffmeyer, J., 2008. Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. Scranton: Scranton University Press.
Hoffmeyer, J., Emmeche, C., 1991. Code duality and the semiotics of nature. In: M. Anderson, M. Floyd, eds. On Semiotic Modeling. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 117—166.
Kull, K., 1999. Towards biosemiotics with Juri Lotman. Semiotica, 127(1/4), pp. 115—131.
Kull, K., 2015. A semiotic theory of life: Lotman’s principles of the universe of the mind. Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism, 19(3), pp. 255—266.
Kull, K., Lotman, Yu., 2015. Au sujet de la sémiotique de la vie et de l’évolution. (Entretien de Kalevi Kull avec Youri Lotman. Tartu, Juin 1992.) Slavica Occitania, 40, pp. 165—182.
Lotman, Yu., 1990a. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: Tauris.
Lotman, Ju., 1990б. “Vita aeterna” intervjuu. (Tammaru, Toomas, toim.). Vita aeterna, 5, pp. 12—20.
Lotman, Ju., 1991. Eessõna eestikeelsele väljaandele. In: Ju. Lotman. Kultuurisemiootika: Tekst — kirjandus — kultuur. Tallinn: Olion, pp. 3—6.
Sebeok, T. A., 1979. Prefigurements of art. Semiotica, 27(1/2), pp. 3—73.