Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2017 Vol. 8 №4

Back to the list Download an article

Philosophical Discourse and the Conceptualisation of Word Formation

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2017-4-3
Pages
31-40

Abstract

The article studies hyphenated complexes in Russian, French, and German philosophical discourses. The author identifies key word-formation models that use the hyphen. In philosophical discourse, the hyphen serves as a linguistic tool to convey dialectic thinking that expresses the conceptualization of the limited/the unlimited, under-certainty or emerging certainty, and motion and stillness. In philosophical texts, hyphenated complexes facilitate the tendency towards a perfect dialectic form in language — a form that embraces discreteness and continuity, division and wholeness. The hyphen is a means that contributes to the formation of concepts as undivided phonosemantic complexes reflecting the prototypes of things. In this sense, the hyphen serves as a tool for language and discourse transfer. In philosophical texts, the key function of the hyphen in newly created formations is conceptualisation. This holds true regardless of the number of components and of the position of the hyphen. The author concludes that the hyphen is a universal cognitive mechanism, characteristic of philosophical discourse; it is a means to form an integrated conceptual complex around the central component of the conceptualisation.

Reference

1. Gegel', G. V. F., 2006. Fenomenologiya dukha [Phenomenology of the spirit]. St. Petersburg.
2. Shchedrina T. G., ed., 2014. Gustav Gustavovich Shpet [Gustav Gustavovich Shpet]. Moscow.
3. Kubryakova, E. S., 2004. Yazyk i znanie. Na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke: chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya, rol' yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and knowledge. On the path of acquiring knowledge of the language: parts of speech from the cognitive point of view, the role of language in the cognition of the world]. Moscow.
4. Kuzanskii, N., 1979. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow, vol. 1.
5. Losev, A. F., 1982. Znak. Simvol. Mif [Sign. Symbol. Myth]. Moscow.
6. Nikolina, N. A., 2009. Aktivnye protsessy v yazyke sovremennoi russkoi khudozhestvennoi literatury [Active processes in the language of modern Russian literature]. Moscow.
7. Onatskaya, O. I., 2005. Stanovlenie defisnogo napisaniya slov v russkom pis'me XVIII — pervoi poloviny XIX veka [Becoming of hyphenated spelling words in Russian writing of ХVIII — the first half of XIX century]. Cand. philol. sci. diss. thesis. Moscow.
8. Podoroga, V. A., 1995. Vyrazhenie i smysl [Expression and meaning]. Moscow.
9. Fateeva, N. A., 2004. Directories "by", "from" and... "to", or Poetical language in progress. In: N. A. Fateeva et al., eds. Poetika iskanii ili poisk poetiki [Poetics of searching or searching for poetics]. Moscow, p. 79—89.
10. Fateeva, N. A., 2006. Otkrytaya struktura: O poeticheskom yazyke i tekste rubezha XX— XXI vekov [Open structure: On the poetic language and the text of the turn of the XX—XXI centuries]. Moscow.