Hybrid genre in persuasive communication
- DOI
- 10.5922/2225-5346-2025-1-5
- Pages
- 74-89
Abstract
Reference
Bakhtin, M. M., 1979. The problem of speech genres. In: M. M. Bakhtin, ed. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow, pp. 250—296 (in Russ.).
Bazerman, C., 2012. Genre as Social Action. In: J. P. Gee and M. Handford, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London; New York, pp. 226—238.
Bhatia, V. K., 1997. Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (3), pp. 181—195, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00039-7.
Bhatia, V. K., 2004. Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London.
Brinker, K., 1992. Linguistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden. Berlin.
Catenaccio, P., 2007. New(s) genre and discursive identity. The changing face of the press release in the age of the Internet. In: G. Garzone, G. Poncini and P. Catenaccio, eds. Multimodality in corporate Communication. Web genres and discursive identity. Milano, pp. 55—72.
Catenaccio, P., 2008. Press releases as a hybrid genre: Addressing the informative / promotional conundrum. Pragmatics, 18 (1), pp. 9—31, https://doi.org/10. 1075/prag.18.1.02cat.
Chernyavskaya, V. E. and Nefedov, S. T., 2021. Towards social Indexicality: From “Kollektiv” to “Team”. And back via Coronavirus Pandemic? Alman Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi — Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur, 46, pp. 1—21, http://doi.org/ 10.26650/sdsl2021-990815.
Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2021. Image and Visuality in Sociocultural Dimension. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2, pp. 96—109, http://doi.org/10.23951/2312- 7899-2021-2-96-109 (in Russ.).
Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2023a. “They call the main entrance a porch”: social meaning in semantics and metapramatics, Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 14 (1), pp. 72—85, https:// doi.org/ 10.5922/2225-5346-2023-1-5 (in Russ.).
Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2023b. Typography as social index: soviet landscape in the modern Russian discourse. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2 (36), pp. 50—73, http://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2023-2-50-73 (in Russ.).
Dementyev, V. V., 2020. What have genre studies given to modern linguistics? Zhanry rechi [Speech genres], 3 (27), pp. 172—194, https://doi.org/10.18500/2311- 0740-2020-3-27-172-194 (in Russ.).
Duff, D., 2000. Modern Genre Theory. London; New York.
Fairclough, N., 1993. Critical Discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4 (2), pp. 133—168, http://doi.org/ 10.1177/0957926593004002.
Feshchenko, V. V., 2024. Treatise disguised as poem: the border-line genre and its linguistic features. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 15 (2), pp. 144—159, http://doi.org/10. 5922/2225-5346-2024-2-9 (in Russ.).
Halmari, H. and Virtanen, T., eds., 2005. Persuasion across genres. A linguistic approach. Amsterdam; Philadelphia.
Heinemann, W. and Viehweger, D., 2002. Textlinguistik. Eine Einführung. Tübingen.
Hyland, K., 2002. Genre: Language, Context, and Literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2, pp. 11—135, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000065.
Mäntynen, A. and Shore, S., 2014. What is meant by hybridity? An investigation of hybridity and related terms in genre studies. Text & Talk, 34 (6), pp. 737—758, https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0022.
Molodychenko, E. N., 2019. “Lifestyle Instruction” as an Internet Genre in Consumer Culture: A CommunicativePragmatic Perspective. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philology], 57, pp. 79—102, https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/57/5 (in Russ.).
Molodychenko, E. N., 2022. Integrating metapragmatics into genre analysis: Does the analytical toolkit need an upgrade in the digital era? Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo niversiteta. Filologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philology], 75, pp. 67—93, https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/75/4 (in Russ.).
Nefedov, S. T., 2022. Teoreticheskaya grammatika nemetskogo yazyka. Sintaksis. Tekst [Theoretical grammar of German. Syntax. Text]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).
Sarangi, S., 2000. Activity types, discourse types and interaction hybridity: The case of genetic counselling. In: S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard, eds. Discourse and social life. London, pp. 1—27, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838502-1.
Tcherniavskaia, V. E., 2014. Discourse paradigm: phantom objects and syndromes. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 1, pp. 54—61 (in Russ.).
Vinokur, T. G., 1993. Govoryashchii i slushayushchii: Varianty rechevogo povedeniya [Speaker and listener: Variants of speech behavior]. Moscow (in Russ.).