Slovo.ru: Baltic accent

2025 Vol. 16 №1

Back to the list Download the article

Hybrid genre in persuasive communication

DOI
10.5922/2225-5346-2025-1-5
Pages
74-89

Abstract

This paper discusses the notion of hybridity as related to text genres. The study pinpoints a particular kind of hybrid genres referring to texts that mix and combine in their structure the features of two or more different genres but maintain their primary genre identity. This kind of genre mixing results inter alia in an advertisement that is shaped as a chat in internet, private talk or recipe but sustains its genre status as an advertisement. The analysis is based on advertisement texts functioning as hybrid genres in modern Russian socio-cultural prac­tice. The theoretical framework of the study is in line with modern investigations in text lin­guistics, text typology, theory of speech genres, persuasion conceptions. The paper discusses the central issues and trends in the study of text genres and indicates related terms that have mainly been used in research on text hybridity and genre blending. It is shown that hybridi­zation of the genre becomes a communicative tool in the persuasion strategy of the communi­cative agent, which aims at influencing a person's or group's attitude or behaviour towards some idea and encouraging to perform post-communicative actions.

Reference

Bakhtin, M. M., 1979. The problem of speech genres. In: M. M. Bakhtin, ed. Esteti­ka slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow, pp. 250296 (in Russ.).

Bazerman, C., 2012. Genre as Social Action. In: J. P. Gee and M. Handford, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London; New York, pp. 226238.

Bhatia, V. K., 1997. Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (3), pp. 181—195, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00039-7.

Bhatia, V. K., 2004. Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London.

Brinker, K., 1992. Linguistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden. Berlin.

Catenaccio, P., 2007. New(s) genre and discursive identity. The changing face of the press release in the age of the Internet. In: G. Garzone, G. Poncini and P. Catenac­cio, eds. Multimodality in corporate Communication. Web genres and discursive identity. Milano, pp. 5572.

Catenaccio, P., 2008. Press releases as a hybrid genre: Addressing the informa­tive / promotional conundrum. Pragmatics, 18 (1), pp. 9—31, https://doi.org/10. 1075/prag.18.1.02cat.

Chernyavskaya, V. E. and Nefedov, S. T., 2021. Towards social Indexicality: From “Kollektiv” to “Team”. And back via Coronavirus Pandemic? Alman Dili ve Edebiyatı Dergisi — Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur, 46, pp. 1—21, http://doi.org/ 10.26650/sdsl2021-990815.

 Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2021. Image and Visuality in Sociocultural Dimension. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2, pp. 96—109, http://doi.org/10.23951/2312- 7899-2021-2-96-109 (in Russ.).

Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2023a. “They call the main entrance a porch”: social mean­ing in semantics and metapramatics, Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 14 (1), pp. 72—85, https:// doi.org/ 10.5922/2225-5346-2023-1-5 (in Russ.).

 Chernyavskaya, V. E., 2023b. Typography as social index: soviet landscape in the modern Russian discourse. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, 2 (36), pp. 50—73, http://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2023-2-50-73 (in Russ.).

Dementyev, V. V., 2020. What have genre studies given to modern linguistics? Zhanry rechi [Speech genres], 3 (27), pp. 172—194, https://doi.org/10.18500/2311- 0740-2020-3-27-172-194 (in Russ.).

Duff, D., 2000. Modern Genre Theory. London; New York.

Fairclough, N., 1993. Critical Discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4 (2), pp. 133—168, http://doi.org/ 10.1177/0957926593004002.

Feshchenko, V. V., 2024. Treatise disguised as poem: the border-line genre and its linguistic features. Slovo.ru: Baltic accent, 15 (2), pp. 144—159, http://doi.org/10. 5922/2225-5346-2024-2-9 (in Russ.).

Halmari, H. and Virtanen, T., eds., 2005. Persuasion across genres. A linguistic ap­proach. Amsterdam; Philadelphia.

Heinemann, W. and Viehweger, D., 2002. Textlinguistik. Eine Einführung. Tübingen.

Hyland, K., 2002. Genre: Language, Context, and Literacy. Annual Review of Ap­plied Linguistics, 2, pp. 11135, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000065.

Mäntynen, A. and Shore, S., 2014. What is meant by hybridity? An investigation of hybridity and related terms in genre studies. Text & Talk, 34 (6), pp. 737758, https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0022.

Molodychenko, E. N., 2019. “Lifestyle Instruction” as an Internet Genre in Con­sumer Culture: A CommunicativePragmatic Perspective. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudar­stvennogo universiteta. Filologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philology], 57, pp. 79—102, https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/57/5 (in Russ.).

Molodychenko, E. N., 2022. Integrating metapragmatics into genre analysis: Does the analytical toolkit need an upgrade in the digital era? Vestnik Tomskogo gosudar­stvennogo niversiteta. Filologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philology], 75, pp. 67—93, https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/75/4 (in Russ.).

Nefedov, S. T., 2022. Teoreticheskaya grammatika nemetskogo yazyka. Sintaksis. Tekst [Theoretical grammar of German. Syntax. Text]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Sarangi, S., 2000. Activity types, discourse types and interaction hybridity: The case of genetic counselling. In: S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard, eds. Discourse and social life. London, pp. 1—27, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838502-1.

Tcherniavskaia, V. E., 2014. Discourse paradigm: phantom objects and syndro­mes. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki [Issues of Cognitive Linguistics], 1, pp. 54—61 (in Russ.).

Vinokur, T. G., 1993. Govoryashchii i slushayushchii: Varianty rechevogo povedeniya [Speaker and listener: Variants of speech behavior]. Moscow (in Russ.).