2024 Vol. 15 №4

Impossible ‘qui pro quo’: Fedor Dostoevsky and Zinaida Gippius (the short story “Ivan Ivanovich and the Devil”)

DOI

10.5922/2225- 5346-2024-4-16

Pages

236-245

Abstract

This paper analyses the operation of the ‘qui pro quo’ principle in Zinaida Gippius's sto­ry “Ivan Ivanovich and the Devil.” Rooted in a comedic literary device based on misunder­standing and confusion, the ‘qui pro quo principle’ was identified by Rita Kleyman as a key element in the poetics of Fedor Dostoevsky's works, particularly in his novel “The Brothers Karamazov”. Scholars have frequently noted the connection between Gippius's story and Dostoevsky’s novel. However, the presence of another link — the ‘qui pro quo principle’ — has yet to be explored in Gippius's text. The analysis demonstrates that the principle mani­fests through the symbolic pairing of the main characters and is closely tied to the theme of temptation. The use of the ‘qui pro quo’ principle in the story results in an inverted portrayal of the motif of temptation. It is argued that one of the defining characteristics of Gippius's imagery — the contradictory nature of the protagonists — is shaped by this principle. The ‘qui pro quo’ is a constant feature of Dostoevsky's works and is reinterpreted by Gippius. The principle is an additional thread linking 19th-century Russian classical literature with Rus­sian modernist literature.

Reference

Al'mi, I. L., 2002. O poehzii i proze [About poetry and prose]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Azadovsky, K. M. and Lavrov, A. V., 1991. Z. N. Gippius: metaphysics, personali­ty, works. In: Gippius Z. N. Sochineniya. Stikhotvoreniya. Proza. [Gippius Z. N. Works. Poems. Prose]. Leningrad, pp. 3—44 (in Russ.).

Babichev, N. T. and Borovsky, Ya. M., 1988. Slovar' latinskikh krylatykh slov: 2500 edi­nits [Dictionary of Latin winged words: 2500 units]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Bocharov, S. G., 2007. The Desert Sower and the Grand Inquisitor. In: Bocharov S. G. Filologicheskie syuzhety [Bocharov S. G. Philological subjects]. Moscow, pp. 233—262 (in Russ.).

Bulgakov, S. N., 1993. Ivan Karamazov (in Dostoevsky's novel “The Brothers Karamazov”) as a philosophical type. In: Sochineniya: v 2 tomakh. [Works: In 2 vol.]. Vol. 2. Moscow, pp. 15—45 (in Russ.).

Dostoevsky, F. M., 1976. The Brothers Karamazov: books. 1—10. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 tomakh [Complete Set of Works: In 30 vol.]. Vol. 14. Leningrad (in Russ.).

Dzhamalova, Ia. Ia., 2021. Roman F. M. Dostoevskogo «Brat'ya Karamazovy» (1880) v retseptsii Z. N. Gippius (rasskaz «Ivan Ivanovich i chert» (1906) [The novel by F. M. Dos­toevsky “The Brothers Karamazov” (1880) in the reception of Z. N. Gippius (short story “Ivan Ivanovich and the Devil” (1906)]. Master’s thesis. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Farafonova, O. A., 2013. Qui pro quo as the organizing principle of the artistic wholeness in F. M. Dostoevsky's novel “The Brothers Karamazov”. In: Morfologiya diskursa lzhi v literature i kul'ture: kollektivnaya monografiya: v 2 ch. [Morphology of the lying discourse in literature and culture: collective monograph: in 2 parts]. Part 2. Novosibirsk, pp. 86—96 (in Russ.).

Gippius, Z. N., 2001. Ivan Ivanovich and the devil. In: Sobranie sochinenii: v 15 to­makh [Set of Works: In 15 vol.]. Vol. 3. Moscow, pp. 488—506 (in Russ.).

Gippius, Z. N., 2003. Falling in love. In: Sobranie sochinenii: v 15 tomakh [Set of Works: In 15 vol.]. Vol. 7. Moscow, pp. 78—89 (in Russ.).

Kalenichenko, O. N., 2015. Intertext as a literary device in the short stories-myths of Z. Gippius about the devil. In: Slovesnoe iskusstvo Serebryanogo veka i Russkogo za­rubezh'ya v kontekste ehpokhi («Smirnovskie chteniya»): sb. st. [Literary art of the Silver Age and the Russian Diaspora in the context of the era (“Smirnov Readings”): article collection]. Moscow, pp. 89—97 (in Russ.).

Kleiman, R. Ya., 1996. Metonymic qui pro quo in Dostoevsky's poetics (Devil. The nightmare of the Russian intelligentsia and the modern tragedy of the Father­land). In: Dostoevsky i sovremennost' [Dostoevsky and modernity]. Staraya Russa, pp. 65—69 (in Russ.).

Kleiman, R. Ya., 2000. Khudozhestvennye konstanty Dostoevskogo v kontekste is­toricheskoi poehtiki [Dostoevsky's artistic сonstants in the context of historical poetics]. PhD Dissertation. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Kurilo, Yu. I., 2012. Problematika i poetika maloi prozy Z. N. Gippius 1890— 1900-kh godov (gendernyi aspect) [Problematics and poetics of small prose by Z. N. Gippius in the 1890s— 1900s (gender aspect)]. Saratov (in Russ.).

Magomedova, D. M., 2018. Rewriting the “New People” Plot in the Russian Fic­tion at the End of the 19th and the Beginning of the 20th Centuries (V. V. Veresayev and Z. N. Gippius). Novyi filologicheskii vestnik [The New Philological Bulletin], 2 (45), pp. 118—125, https://doi.org/10.24411/2072-9316-2018-00020 (in Russ.).

Propp, V. Ya., 1976. Problemy komizma i smekha [Problems of comedy and laugh­ter]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Slovar' literaturovedcheskikh terminov [Dictionary of Literary Terms], 1974. Mos­cow (in Russ.).

Stepanyan, K. A., 2010. Yavlenie i dialog v romanakh F. M. Dostoevskogo [Phenome­non and dialogue in the novels of F. M. Dostoevsky]. St. Petersburg (in Russ.).

Tomson, D., 1996. The male Self in the work of Zinaida Gippius: a literary device or a psychological need? Preobrazhenie [Transformation], 4, pp. 138—149. Available at: https://a-z.ru/women_cd1/html/preobrazh_4_1996_g.htm [Accessed 15 Sep­tember 2023] (in Russ.).