2023 Vol. 14 №2

Conceptualizing emotions through discourse: a pragmatic view on the reader's interest

DOI

10.5922/2225-5346-2023-2-6

Pages

93-114

Abstract

The paper adopts a sociopragmatic approach to the study of emotion processes and investigates discursive traits of the reader’s interest. The field of written popularization was examined to establish how it conceptualizes the reader’s interest through discourse structures. The text materials were obtained experimentally. They consist of 104 pairs of expository text; each of the pairs includes a text published in an academic source and a popular science text created by the participant for provoking the reader’s interest. The comparative methods of empirical discourse analysis are used to identify and describe popularisation strategies. The results show that participants employed four strategies to transform academic texts: reduction N = 94), simplification (N = 81), contextualization (N = 58), and concrete elaboration (N = 17). The strategies tend to present the most significant text ideas, reduce reader’s efforts for processing, and introduce the reader into the discourse-world. The findings suggest that the strategies aim to enhance the optimal relevance and conceptualize reader’s interest through the communicative dimension of relevance.

Reference

Alba-Juez, L., 2021. Affect and emotion. In: M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár and M. Ter­kourafi, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge, pp. 340—362, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.019.

Alba-Juez, L. and Mackenzie, J. L., 2019. Emotion processes in discourse. In: J. L. Mackenzie and L. Alba-Juez, eds. Emotion in Discourse. Amsterdam, pp. 3—26, https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.01alb.

Austin, J. L., 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford.

Bohn-Gettler, C. M. and Kaakinen, J., 2022. Introduction to the special issue on emotions in reading, learning, and communication. Discourse Processes, 59 (1—2), pp. 1—12, https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1899369.

Bondi, M., 2018. Dialogicity in written language use: Variation across expert ac­tion games. In: E. Weigand and I. Kecskes, eds. From Pragmatics to Dialogue. Ams­ter­dam, Philadelphia, pp. 137—170, https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.08bon.

Bornstein, O., Katzir, M., Simchon, A. and Eyal, T., 2020. Differential effects of abs­tract and concrete processing on the reactivity of basic and self-conscious emo­tions. Cognition and Emotion, 35 (5), pp. 1—14, https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931. 2020.1848804.

Bouko, C., 2020. Emotions through texts and images: A multimodal analysis of reactions to the Brexit vote on Flickr. Pragmatics, 30 (2), pp. 222—246, https://doi. org/10.1075/prag.18060.bou.

Burdelski, M., 2020. Emotion and affect in language socialization. In: S. E. Pritz­ker, J. Fenigsen and J. M. Wilce, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Emotion. Lon­don, N. Y., pp. 28—48, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855093-3.

Calsamiglia, H. and van Dijk, T. A., 2004. Popularization discourse and know­led­ge about the genome. Discourse and Society, 15 (4), pp. 369—389, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0957926504043705.

Choi, S.-M., 2006. Two types of text-based situational interest evoking strategies: Se­duc­tive details and concrete elaboration and their effects on the 1st year EFL high school stu­dents’ written text comprehension and interest. PhD thesis. Buffalo.

Clinton, V. and van der Broek, P., 2012. Interest, inferences, and learning from texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, pp. 650—663, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lindif.2012.07.004.

Clinton-Lisell, V., 2022. Reading medium and interest: Effects and interac­tions. Educational Psychology, 42 (2), pp. 142—162, https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021. 2016635.

Connelly, D. A., 2011. Applying Silvia’s Model of Interest to Academic Text: Is There a Third Appraisal? Learning and Individual Differences, 21 (5), pp. 624—628, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.007.

de Saussure, L. and Wharton, T., 2020. Relevance, effects and affect. International Re­view of Pragmatics, 12 (2), pp. 183—205, https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01202001.

Fetzer, A., 2018. Context. In: Ya. Huang, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. N. Y., pp. 259—276, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.15.

Fitria, W., 2019. Reading Interest and Reading Comprehension: A Correlational Study. Journal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies, 4 (1), pp. 95—107, https://doi. org/10.30983/educative.v4i1.1333.

Fulmer, S. M., D’Mello, S. K., Strain, A. and Graesser, A. C., 2015. Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning. Con­temporary Educational Psychology, 41, pp. 98—110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych. 2014.12.005.

Gendenshtein, L. E., 2005. The anatomy of interest. Narodnoe obrazovanie [Natio­nal Education], 7, pp. 120—126 (in Russ.).

Givón, T., 2020. Coherence. Amsterdam, Philadelphia.

Hayakawa, S. I., 1977. Language in Thought and Action. London.

Hidi, S., 2001. Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical consi­de­ra­tions. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (3), pp. 191—209, https://doi.org/10.1023/ A:1016667621114.

Hidi, S. and Baird, B., 1988. Strategies for increasing text-based interest and stu­dents’ recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23 (4), pp. 465—483, https://doi.org/10.2307/747644.

Hoey, M., 2001. Textual Interaction. London.

Hyland, K., 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London, N. Y.

Hyland, K., 2014. Dialogue, community and persuasion in research writing. In: L. Gil-Salom and C. Soler-Monreal, eds. Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres. Ams­ter­dam, Philadelphia, pp. 1—20, https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.02hyl.

Izard, C. E., 2007. Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new pa­ra­digm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1 (3), pp. 260—280, https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00044.x.

Kang, Q., 2013. On Perlocutionary Act. Studies in Literature and Language, 6, pp. 60—64, https://doi.org/10.3968/n.

Katriel, T., 2015. Exploring emotion discourse. In: H. Flam and J. Kleres, eds. Methods of Exploring Emotions. London, N. Y., pp. 57—66, https://doi.org/.4324/978 1315756530-7.

Khoutyz, I. P., 2019. Storytelling in lecture discourse. St. Petersburg State Polytech­nical University Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences, 10 (2), pp. 64—73, https://doi. org/10.18721/JHSS.10206 (in Russ.).

Kintsch, W., 1980. Learning from Text, Levels of Comprehension, or: Why Anyone Would Read a Story Anyway. Poetics, 9, pp. 87—98, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304- 422X(80)90013-3.

Kneepkens, E. W. E. M. and Zwaan, R. A., 1994. Emotions and literary text comp­re­hension. Poetics, 23, pp. 125—138, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00021-W.

Koschut, S., 2020. Emotion, discourse, and power in world politics. In: S. Ko­schut, ed. The Power of Emotions in World Politics, n. l, pp. 3—27, https://doi.org/ 10.4324/9780429331220-2.

Koschut, S., Hall, T. H., Wolf, R., Solomon, T., Hutchison, E. and Bleiker, R., 2017. Discourse and emotions in international relations. International Studies Review, 19 (3), pp. 481—508, https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix033.

Lane, A. B. and Kent, M. L., 2018. Dialogic Engagement. In: K. A. Johnston and M. Taylor, eds. The Handbook of Communication Engagement. Hoboken, pp. 61—72, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119167600.ch5.

Langlotz, A. and Locher, M. A., 2013. The role of emotions in relational work. Jour­nal of Pragmatics, 58, pp. 87—107.

Leckie-Tarry, H., 1991. Register: A Functional Linguistics theory. PhD thesis. Murdoch.

Lepper, Ch., Stang, J. and McElvany, N., 2022. Gender Differences in Text-Based Interest: Text Characteristics as Underlying Variables. Reading Research Quarterly, 57 (2), pp. 537—554, https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.420.

Makkonen-Craig, H., 2014. Aspects of dialogicity: Exploring dynamic interre­lations in written discourse. In: A.-M. Karlsson, ed. Analysing text and talk. Uppsala, pp. 99—120.

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D., 2007. Working with Discourse. 1. 2nd ed.

Meyer, B. J. F., 1992. An Analysis of a Plea for Money. In: W. C. Mann and S. A. Thomp­son, eds. Discourse description: diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 79—108, https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.05mey.

Mikk, J. and Kukemelk, H., 2010. The relationship of text features to the level of interest in science texts. Trames: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 14 (1), pp. 54—70, https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2010.1.04.

Moisander, J. K., Hirsto, H. and Fahy, K., 2016. Emotions in institutional work: A discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 37 (7), pp. 963—990, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0170840615613377.

Naceur, A. and Schiefele, U., 2005. Motivation and learning — The role of inte­rest in construction of representation of text and long-term retention: Inter- and int­raindividual analyses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20 (2), pp. 155—170, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173505.

Odintsov, V. V., 1982. Rechevye formy populyarizatsii [Speech Forms of Populariza­tion]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Olson, R. E., Bellocchi, A. and Dadich, A., 2020. A post-paradigmatic approach to analysing emotions in social life. Emotions and Society, 2 (2), pp. 157—178, https:// doi.org/10.1332/263169020X15893854268688.

Ozyumenko, V. I. and Larina, T. V., 2021. Threat and fear: Pragmatic purposes of emo­tionalisation in media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25 (3), pp. 746—766, https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-746-766.

Piotrovskaya, L., 2009. Description, Expression and Reflection of Emotions in Language Behaviour. In: W. Oleksy and P. Stalmaszczyk, eds. Cognitive Approaches to Language and Linguistic Data: Studies in Honor of Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk. Frankfurt a/Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, pp. 307—338.

Piotrovskaya, L. and Trushchelev, P., 2019. An Experimental Investigation of Text Emotiogenicity (formation of interest in a school text). Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Sciences, 192, pp. 112—123 (in Russ.).

Piotrovskaya, L. A. and Trushchelev, P. N., 2020. What makes a text interesting? Interest-evoking strategies in expository text from Russian school textbooks. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 24 (4), pp. 991—1016, https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020- 24-4-991-1016 (in Russ.).

Piotrovskaya, L. and Trushchelev, P., 2021. Linguistic Approach to Study of Strategies for Increasing Text-Based Interest. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 108, pp. 276—183, https://doi. org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.05.02.33.

Piotrovskaya, L. and Trushchelev, P., 2022. Communicating recipient’s emotions: Text-triggered interest. Training, Language and Culture, 6 (1), pp. 60—74.

Putro, N. H. P. S. and Lee, J., 2017. Reading interest in a digital age. Reading Psychology, 38 (8), pp. 778—807, https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1341966.

Renninger, K. A., Bachrach, J. E. and Hidi, S. E., 2019. Triggering and maintaining interest in early phases of interest development. Learning, Culture and Social Interac­tion, 23, p. 100260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.11.007.

Sadoski, M. and Paivio, A., 2013. Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. London, N. Y.

Schraw, G. and Lehman, S., 2001. Situational Interest: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (1), pp. 23—52, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009004801455.

Shakhovsky, V. I., 2008. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya emotsii [The Linguistic Theory of Emotions]. Moscow (in Russ.).

Shin, J., Chang, Yu. and Kim, Yo., 2016. Effects of Expository-Text Structures on Text-Based Interest, Comprehension, and Memory. The SNU Journal of Education Re­search, 25 (2), pp. 39—57.

Silvia, P. J., 2006. Exploring the Psychology of Interest. N. Y., Oxford.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D., 1995. Relevance. Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford, Cambridge.

Springer, Sh. E., Dole, J. A. and Hacker, D. J., 2017. The role of interest in reading comprehension. In: S. E. Israel, ed. Handbook of research on reading comprehension. N. Y., London, pp. 519—542.

Tokareva, P., 2006. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki v sovremennom uchebnom diskurse (na materiale shkol'nykh uchebnikov) [The communicative strategies and tactics in contemporary educational discourse (based on school textbooks)]. PhD Disserta­tion. Omsk (in Russ.).

Trushchelev, P., 2022. Text-based interest from a linguistic perspective: emotive pragmatics of history textbooks. Philological Sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Educa­tion, (2), pp. 81—90 https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.2-22.081 (in Russ.).

van Berkum, J. J. A., 2018. Language Comprehension, Emotion, and Sociality: Aren’t We Missing Something? In: Sh.-A. Rueschemeyer and G. Gaskell, eds. Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. 2nd ed. Oxford, pp. 644—669, https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780198786825.013.28.

van Dijk, T. A., 1977. Text and Context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London, N. Y.

van Dijk, T. A., 2008. Discourse and Context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge, N. Y., Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo.

van Dijk, T. A. and Atienza, E., 2011. Knowledge and discourse in secondary school social science textbooks. Discourse Studies, 13 (1), pp. 93—118. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461445610387738.

Wade, S. E., 2001. Research on Importance and Interest: Implications for Curri­culum Development and Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (3), pp. 243—261, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016623806093.

Westberg, G., 2021. Affect as a multimodal practice. Multimodality & Society, 1 (1), pp. 20—38, https://doi.org/10.1177/2634979521992734.

Wetherell, M., 2012. Affect and Emotion. Los Angeles, London, Washington DC.

Wetherell, M., 2013. Affect and discourse — What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity, (6), pp. 349—368, https://doi. org/10.1057/sub.2013.13.

Wharton, T., Bonard, C., Dukes, D., Sander, D. and Oswald, S., 2021. Relevance and emotion. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, pp. 259—269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pragma.2021.06.001.

Wharton, T. and Strey, C., 2019. Slave of the Passions: Making Emotions Rele­vant. In: K. Scott, B. Clark and R. Carston, eds. Relevance: pragmatics and interpretation. Cambridge, pp. 253—267, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.022.

Wilson, D., 1998. Discourse, coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora. Journal of Pragmatics, 29, pp. 57—74, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00012-X.

Zhong, Ya., Jiang, Ch., Xu, W. and Li, Ju. J., 2020. Discourse level factors for sentence deletion in text simplification. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Arti­ficial Intelligence, 34 (5), pp. 9709—9716, https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6520.