Russian soft power in the Baltic States through the lens of research: traditions, competition, confrontation :: IKBFU's united scientific journal editorial office

×

Login
Password
Forgot your password?
Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services:
   
There is only one science. Two sciences are impossible as two universes are
Alexander Herzen

DOI-generator Search by DOI on Crossref.org

Russian soft power in the Baltic States through the lens of research: traditions, competition, confrontation

Author Vorotnikov V. V., Ivanova N. A.
DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-3-6
Pages 107-124
Article Download
Keywords soft power, effect of soft power, Russian foreign policy, Baltic states, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania
Abstract (summary) In this article, we aim to analyse the research discourse in the Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) as regards Russian soft power, which is considered as hard power, and to compare the theses that dominate this discourse with the actual interactions between Russia and the three states in media, education, and culture. Each Baltic country has built a system of political and legal restrictions to diminish the effect of Russian soft power, which is considered in terms of hard power, i.e. as a threat to national security. The current forms of Russian soft power are becoming less productive in the region and their use in the negative political context of bilateral relations has the opposite effect for Russia – the country loses in reputation and image. The main factor at play is the information content of the Russian-language media space. At odds with the historical and political views of a significant part of the Baltic States’ ruling class, it is becoming the target of counteraction. At the same time, Russian high and mass culture and, partly, educational services are in demand from both Baltic Russian speakers and ethnic Lithuanians, Latvians, and Estonians. Our analysis shows that the views of Baltic researchers that Russian soft power is politics-driven and foreign to the region are exaggerated and biased. In its turn, Russian soft power in the Baltics retains the potential to aid the country’s foreign policy, being a complement to the latter rather than its direct tool.
References 1. Nye, J. S. 1990, Bound to lead: the changing nature of American power, New York, Basic Books, 370 p.
2. Nye, J. S. 2006, Gibkaya vlast’: Kak dobit’sya uspekha v mirovoi politike [Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics], Novosibirsk, FSPI “Trendy”, 221 p. (in Russ.)
3. Anholt, S. 2006, Is place branding a capitalist tool? Place Branding, Vol. 2., no. 1, p. 1—4.
4. Nisbett, M. 2016, Who holds the power of soft power? Arts and International Affairs, no. 1 (1), available at: https://theartsjournal.net/2016/03/13/nisbett/ (accessed 16.01.2019).
5. Waller, J. 2008, Michael Strategic Public Diplomacy, Counterpropaganda, and Political Warfare, Institute of World Politics Press, 408 p.
6. McClory, J. A. 2018, Global Ranking of Soft Power, USC Center on Public Diplomacy, Portland, available at: https://softpower30.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/The-Soft-Power-30-Report-2018.pdf (accessed 16.01.2019).
7. Zaharna, R. S. 2007, The Soft Power Differential: Network Communication and Mass Communication in Public Diplomacy, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, Vol. 2, no. 3, p. 213—228. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/187119007X240505.
8. Papadopoulos, N. 2004, Place branding: Evolution, meaning and implications, Place Branding, Vol. 1, no. 1, p. 36—49.
9. Szondi, G. 2008, Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingadael’, 52 p., available at: http://www.kamudiplomasisi.org/pdf/nationbranding.pdf (accessed 16.01.2019).
10. Anholt, S. 2004, Editorial, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Vol. 1, no. 1, p. 4—11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990001.
11. Brzezinski, Z. 1998, Velikaya shakhmatnaya doska. Gospodstvo Ameriki i ego geostrategicheskie imperativy [The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives], Moscow, International Relations, 256 p. (in Russ.)
12. Lebedeva, M. M. 2017, Soft Power: The Concept and Approaches, Vestnik MGIMO-Universita [MGIMO Review of International Relations], no. 3 (54), p. 212—223. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-3-54-212-223 (in Russ.)
13. Lebedeva, M. M. Fort. J., 2009, Higher Education as Soft Power Potential of Russia, Vestnik MGIMO-Universita [MGIMO Review of International Relations], no. (6) 9, p. 200—205 (in Russ.)
14. Leonova, O. G. 2013, Soft Power — Foreign Policy Resource of the State, Obozrevatel’-Observer, no. 4, p. 27—40 (in Russ.)
15. Torkunov, A. V. 2012, Education as a Soft Power Tool in Russian Foreign Policy, Vestnik MGIMO-Universita [MGIMO Review of International Relations], no. 4, p. 85—93 (in Russ.)
16. Rostoks, T., Sprūds, A. (eds.) 2015, The different faces of “soft power”: the Baltic States and Eastern Neighborhood between Russia and the EU, Latvian Institute of International Affairs, 256 p.
17. Isoda, V. 2010, Minkštosios galios generavimas ir reikšmė valstybių užsienio politikoje XXI amžiuje: JAV atvejis, Politikos mokslų almanachas, no. 7, p. 93—114.
18. Grigas, A. 2012, Legacies, Coercion and Soft Power: Russian Influence in the Baltic States, Chattam House Briefing Paper, 16 p.
19. Maliukevičius, N. 2015, “Tools of destabilization”: Kremlin media offensive in Lithuania, Journal on Baltic Security, Vol. 1, no. 1, p. 117—126.
20. Paet, U. 2014, EU Soft Power: Estonia versus the Multiplication of Brutality, Diplomaatia, available at: https://icds.ee/eu-soft-power-estonia-versus-the-multiplication-of-brutality/ (accessed 16.01.2019).
21. Winnerstig, M. (ed.) 2014, Tools of Destabilization Russian Soft Power and Non-military Influence in the Baltic States, Swedish Defense Research Agency, 146 p.
22. Martine, S. 2004, Language use in Latvian radio and television: legislation and practice, Centre for public policy, PROVIDUS, 79 p.
23. Simonyan, R. H. 2004, Baltic Mass-media: Dynamics of Last Decade, Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], no. 2 (238), p. 98—105 (in Russ.)
24. Cepurītis, M., Gulbis, R. 2012, Ārpolitikas mīti Latvijā: Eiropas Savienība un Krievija, Rīga, Latvijas Vēstures mazās bibliotēkas atbalsta fonds, 108 pp.
25. Dolinskiy, A. V. 2014, Educational Exchanges in Public Diplomacy: Russian and International Experience, Vestnik MGIMO-Universita [MGIMO Review of International Relations], no. 2 (35), p. 56—62 (in Russ.)
26. Vendina, O. I., Kolosov, V. A., Sebentsov, A. B. 2014, Are the Baltic States Part of the Post-Soviet Space? Mezhdunarodnye process [International Trends], Vol. 12, no. 1—2 (36—37), p. 76—92 (in Russ.)
27. Pelnens, G. 2009, The “Humanitarian Dimension” of Russian Foreign Police toward Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, and the Baltic States, 2nd edn., Riga, CEEPS, 352 p.
28. Ljung, B., Malmlöf, T., Neretnieks, K., Winnerstig, M. 2012, The Security and Defensibility of the Baltic States, FOI-R-3471-SE, Stockholm.
29. Ivantsova, A. 2015, Theater and Cinema in Riga. In: Vorotnikov, V. V., Oskolkov, P. V. Den’ kul’tury stran Baltii [Baltic Cultures Day], Conference proceedings, Мoscow, DPK-Press, p. 19—27 (in Russ.)
30. Lukyanov, F. A. 2014, Paradoxes of Russian Soft Power, Franco-Russian analytical center “Observo”, available at: http://obsfr.ru/fileadmin/Projets_obs/RIS_ru_Loukianov.pdf (accessed 16.01.2019) (in Russ.)


Back to the section