The ‘hybrid model’ of Norway’s ethnic policy in its northern counties: a key to stable interethnic relations :: IKBFU's united scientific journal editorial office

×

Login
Password
Forgot your password?
Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services:
   
The supreme embodiment of reason is science
Ivan P. Pavlov

DOI-generator Search by DOI on Crossref.org

The ‘hybrid model’ of Norway’s ethnic policy in its northern counties: a key to stable interethnic relations

Author Zadorin, M. Yu., Kotlova, E. S.
DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-2-1
Pages 4-16
Article Download
Keywords Norway, migration, ethnic policy, law, national question, acculturation, non-violent assimilation, voluntary segregation, nationalism, integration, multiculturalism
Abstract (summary) In this article, we study the political and legal model currently used by Norway in its Northern counties. This work is a part of comprehensive research supported by the Russian Science Foundation. Our study aims to provide a historical perspective to the model of Nor­way’s national ethnic policy in the Northern counties by identifying the operational capabili­ties and assessing the efficiency of these models amid increasing migration flows and changes in the country’s socio-economic environment. The methods we use in this multidisciplinary study are situated at the interface of national and international law, political science, history, and sociology. They include the comparative historical method (the dynamics of ethno-political processes), the systemic method (ethic policy in the framework of target-based pro­gramme management), the comparative law method (a comparison of national legal systems and international contractual standards), the value and norm-driven method (ethnic policy viewed through the prism of public good), institutional method (the role of political institu­tions), and the secondary analysis of sociological data. We also rely on qualitative methods, namely, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data on ethnic diasporas living in the North of Norway. As a result, we establish that the Kingdom of Norway has a unified ap­proach to national ethnic policy, which rests on self-confessed multiculturalism. However, different ethnic political models are applied in the case of certain ethnic groups. Today, against the background of declared state multiculturalism and integration, the models of ac­culturation and non-violent assimilation are both operational in Norway. There are sporadic expressions of nationalism and voluntary segregation. We conclude that, despite a unified approach to ethnic policy and despite Norway’s political and legal achievements in the pro­tection of indigenous peoples’ rights, the country’s government carries out a differentiated ‘hybrid’ ethnic policy towards ethnic groups living on its territory. The growing infighting between the right and the left parties in the Storting translates into unpopular and spur-of-the-moment political decisions as regards inter-ethnic relations.
References

1.   Fomin, K. V. 2017, The Models of Political Indentification (C. Taylor, E. Laclau, C. Mouffe), Vestn. Sev. (Arktich.) feder. un-ta. Ser.: Gumanit. i sots. nauki [Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University], no. 2, p. 90—98. doi: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2017.2.90 (in Russ.).

2.   Zaykov, K. S., Tamitskiy, A. M., Zadorin, M. Y. 2016, The fundamentals of ethnic-national policy of a state on example of the Russian Federation, Federalizm [Federalizm], no. 3 (83), p. 145—158. (in Russ.).

3.   Kymlicka, W. 1995, Multicultural citizenship. A liberal theory of minority rights. Ox­ford: Clarendon Press. URL: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198290918. 001.0001/acprof-9780198290919 (accessed 20.06.2017).

4.   Kostenko, V. V. 2014, Migration theories: from assimilation to transnationalism, Zhur­nal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthro­pology]. T. XVII, no. 3 (74), p. 62—76 (in Russ.).

5.   Andersson, R., Dhalmann, H., Holmqvisti, E. et al. 2010, Immigration, Housing and Segregation in the Nordic Welfare States. Helsinki. URL: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/ handle/10138/25849/julkaisuc2.pdf (accessed 20.06.2017).

6.   Plankina, R. M. 2015, To Study the Issue of Binary Opposition “own — stranger” in the anthropocentric paradigm (based on the works of Leo Tolstoy, G. Ishaki), Filologiya i kul’tu­ra [Philology and Culture], no. 3 (41), p. 109—115 (in Russ.).

7.   Eckstein, H. 2015, Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway. Prin­ceton University Press. P. 34—65.

8.   Eriksen, T. H. 2013, Immigration and national identity in Norway, Migration Policy Institute, Washington, D. C. URL: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/TCM-Norwaycasestudy. pdf (accessed 20.06.2017).

9.   Søholt, S., Wessel, T. 2010, Contextualizing ethnic residential segregation in Norway: welfare, housing and integration policy. NORFACE. URL: http://blogs.helsinki.fi/nodesproject/ files/2010/12/Norway.pdf (accessed 20.06.2017).

10.  Ulserød, T., Krastins, J. 2015, The Norwegian response to the refugee crisis. Country Report, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. 23.12. URL: http://www.kas.de/wf/en/33.43823/ (acces­sed 20.06.2017).

11.  Josefsen, E. 2010, The Saami and the national parliaments: Channels for political in­fluence, Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) and UN Development Program (UNDP). URL: http://archive.ipu.org/splz-e/chiapas10/saami.pdf (accessed 27.11.2017).

12.  Skardhamar T., Aaltonen M., Lehti M. 2014, Immigrant crime in Norway and Fin­land, Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, no. 15 (2), p. 107—127. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2014.926062.

13.  Abebe, D. S. 2010, Public Health Challenges of Immigrants in Norway: A Research Review. Report 2. NAKMI — Norwegian Center for Minority Health Research. URL: http:// www.nakmi.no/publikasjoner/dokumenter/Public-Health-Challenges-of-Immigrants-in-Norway- nakmireport-2-2010.pdf (accessed 20.06.2017).

14.  Nilsen, J. P., Zaikov, K. S. 2012, The Norwegian-Russian Arctic Borderland: from the common districts till Pomor zone, Arctic and North, no. 5, p. 71—84.

15.  Goldin, V. I., Zaikov, K. S., Tamitskiy, A. M. 2015, Sami in the history of Norwe­gian-Russian borderland: factor of tension or regional integration?, Bylye gody. Rossiyskiy istoricheskiy zhurnal [Bylye Gody. Russian Historical Journal], no. 37 (3), p. 519—535.

16.  Zaikov, K., Tamitskiy, A., Zadorin, M. 2017, Legal and political framework of the federal and regional legislation on national ethnic policy in the Russian Arctic, The Polar Journal, no. 1 (7), p. 125—142. doi: 10.1080/2154896X.2017.1327748.


Back to the section