Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

Current issue

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Stepanov M. A.

The “Last” Republican: Kant’s Political Philosophy in the Light of Republicanism

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2026-2-4
Pages
68-92
Kant’s political philosophy republicanism republican theory political freedom non-domination rule of law self-government political participation

Abstract

Today, with the growing popularity of republicanism, literature on the topic includes more and more works whose authors attempt to re-read classical political thinkers in terms of republican theory, so as to situate them within the republican canon. Some such efforts have been made with respect to Kant. Traditionally, his political philosophy is thought, more often than not, to be liberal. Republican authors break this consensus, representing him as a republican sympathiser. Some even regard him as a special figure in the history of republican thought. The reason for this is that in Kant’s time, republicanism was gradually leaving the historical stage, giving way to liberalism, to eventually be ousted and practically forgotten until the twentieth century. From this perspective, Kant comes across as one of the last republicans of his time. He is believed to have abandoned some significant republican ideas under the influence of competing politico-philosophical systems, such that he is thought to be a republican only up to a certain point. In this article, I challenge this view, demonstrating that Kant has more in common with republicanism than some researchers believe. To this end, I put his political philosophy in the context of what is known as Roman republicanism, one of the best-studied and currently most popular strands of republican thought. Its main elements are 1) freedom as non-domination, 2) supremacy of law, and 3) self-government. My analysis of Kant’s socio-political views from the perspective of these elements shows that, on the whole, they agree. I conclude that Kant should be viewed as a representative of the Roman branch of republicanism.

Full text

json#{"TEXT":"","TYPE":"HTML"}

Reference

Arendt, H., 1982. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Audier, S., 2015. Les théories de la république: nouvelle édition. Paris: La Découverte.

Bielefeldt, H., 1997. Autonomy and Republicanism: Immanuel Kant’s Philosophy of Freedom. Political Theory, 25(4), pp. 524-558.

Chaly, V. A., 2014. Kant between Liberalism and Conservatism. Kantian Journal, 4, pp. 54-60. https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2014-4-4. (In Rus.)

Cicero, 1998. The Republic and The Laws. Translated by N. Rudd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Demenchonok, E., 2019. Learning from Kant: On Freedom. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 75, pp. 191-230. https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0191.

Forst, R., 2013. A Kantian Republican Conception of Justice as Nondomination. In: A. Niederberger and P. Schink, eds. 2013. Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 154-168.

Gregory, M., 2023. Does the Kantian state Dominate? Freedom and Majoritarian Rule. Ratio, 36(2), pp. 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12366.

Hobbes, T., 2012. Leviathan. In 3 Volumes. Volume 2: The English and Latin Texts. Edited by N. Malcolm. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Honohan, I., 2003. Civic Republicanism. London & New York: Routledge.

Kant, I., 1991. The Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 1996a. An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-22.

Kant, I., 1996b. Toward Perpetual Peace. A Philosophical Project (1795). In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 317-351.

Kant, I., 1996с. On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, But It Is of no Use in Practice (1793). In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical philosophy. Translated and edited by M. J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279-309.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A.W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2007. Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim. In: I. Kant, 2007. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by G. Zöller and R. B. Louden ; translated by A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-120.

Kant, I., 2009. Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. Translated by W. S. Pluhar. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

Kharkhordin, O. V., 2021. Respublika. Polnaya versiya [The Republic. Full Version]. Saint-Petersburg: The European University at Saint-Petersburg Press. (In Rus.)

Kleingeld, P., 2020. Me, My Will and I. Kant’s Republican Conception of Freedom of the Will and Freedom of the Agent. Studi Kantiani, 33, pp. 103-123. https://doi.org/10.19272/202002901008.

Lovett, F. and Pettit, P., 2009. Neorepublicanism: A Normative and Institutional Research Program. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, pp. 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.120952.

Machiavelli, N., 1996. Discourses on Livy. Translated by H. C. Mansfield and N. Tarcov. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Maliks, R., 2014. Kant’s Politics in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, E., 2004. The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pettit, P., 1997. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Pettit, P., 2013. Two Republican Traditions. In: A. Niederberger and P. Schink, eds. 2013. Republican Democracy: Liberty, Law and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 169-204.

Pocock, J. G. A. 2016. The Machiavellian Moment. Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Polybius, 2010. The Histories. Translated by R. Waterfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ripstein, A., 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Savidan, P., 2007. Le républicanisme de Kant. In: C. Berner and F. Capeillères, 2007. Kant et les kantismes dans la philosophie contemporaine: 1804—2004. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, pp. 43-65.

Skinner, Q., 1984. The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. In: R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind and Q. Skinner, eds. 1984. Philosophy in History. Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193-221.

Skinner, Q., 1998. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stepanov, M. A., 2025. Republicanism: The Practice of Conceptualization. Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 9(3), pp. 252-276. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2025-3-252-276. (In Rus.)

Unberath, H., 2008. Freedom in the Kantian State. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 16, pp. 321-367.

Viroli, M., 2002. Republicanism. New York: Hill and Wang.

Westphal, K. R., 1993. Republicanism, Despotism, and Obedience to the State: The Inadequacy of Kant’s Division of Powers. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 1, pp. 263-281.