Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

2023 Vol. 42. №3

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Lewin M.

Introduction to ‘Kant and Metaphilosophy’

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2023-3-1
Pages
7-16
Kant metaphilosophy philosophy of philosophy definition of philosophy discipline research field conceptual analysis history of philosophy

Abstract

There is a growing interest in both Kant’s conception of philosophy and contemporary metaphilosophy, understood as philosophical inquiry into philosophy, its aims, purpose, subjects, structure, practice and methods. Kant has not contributed to metaphilosophy qua contemporary discipline, but his direct analyses of what philosophy is and how it is to be done can be identified with general subjects and problems constituting the research field of metaphilosophy. Several aspects of Kant’s conception of philosophy and its metaphilosophical value are the subject of current debates, such as the taxonomy of philosophy, relation between empirical and non-empirical philosophy, relation between philosophy and its history, conceptual analysis, deductive reasoning and philosophical disagreement.

Reference

Bacin, S., Ferrarin, A., La Rocca, C. and Ruffing, M., eds. 2013. Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246490.

Illetterati, L. and Miolli, G., eds. 2022. The Relevance of Hegel’s Concept of Philosophy: From Classical German Philosophy to Contemporary Metaphilosophy. London, New York & Dublin: Bloomsbury Academic.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cam­bridge University Press.

Kant, I., 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Edited by M. J. Gregor, translated by A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 353-604.

Lewin, M., 2021a. Kant’s Metaphilosophy. Open Philosophy, 4(1), pp. 292-310. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0190.

Lewin, M., 2021b. Transcendental Philosophy as a Scientific Research Programme. Kantian Journal, 40(3), pp. 93-126. https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2021-3-4.

Lewin, M., 2023. Metaphilosophie als einheitliche Disziplin. Berlin: Springer & Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66704-0.

Loeb, P. S. and Meyer, M., eds. 2019. Nietzsche’s Meta­philosophy. The Nature, Method, and Aims of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381338.

Raatzsch, R., 2014. Philosophiephilosophie. 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04436-7_1.

Reinhold, K. L., 1803. Beyträge zur leichtern Über­sicht des Zustandes der Philosophie beym Anfange des 19. Jahrhunderts. Volume 6. Hamburg: Friedrich Perthes.

Rescher, N., 2014. Metaphilosophy. Philosophy in Philosophical Perspective. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Rescher, N., 2021. Philosophy Examined. Metaphilosophy in Pragmatic Perspective. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110747386.

Theunissen, B., 2014. Hegels Phänomenologie als metaphilosophische Theorie. Hegel und das Problem der Vielfalt der philosophischen Theorien. Eine Studie zur systemexternen Rechtfertigungsfunktion der Phänomenologie des Geistes. Hamburg: Meiner. https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2720-1.

Williamson, T., 2018. Doing Philosophy: From Common Curiosity to Logical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.