Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

2023 Vol. 42. №2

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Chaly V. A.

Reclaiming the “Cultural Mandate”: The Idea of Sustainable Development in the Kantian Perspective

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2023-2-4
Pages
68-94
Kant sustainable development Club of Rome modernity cultural mandate maturity

Abstract

In the Club of Rome report Come on! Capitalism, Short-Termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet (2018) Kant, along with other “old” Enlighteners, is presented as the father of a world-view which led to the destabilisation of the environment in which humanity exists. The authors of the report argue that the “old Enlightenment” with its individualism, faith in the market and a consumerist attitude to nature should be scrapped. I maintain that this assessment of Kant’s philosophy is groundless and that his ideas allow us both to conduct a more profound diagnosis of the crisis and to propose a more solidly founded strategy of overcoming it. First, I sum up the position of the authors concerning the loss of sustainability of development which they attribute to the philosophy of Enlightenment. Next, I outline the history and content of the notion of “sustainable development” and offer an analysis of the sources of progressivist commitment to the conquest of nature which lie outside Modern Times in the idea of the “cultural mandate”. Then I present the Kantian diagnosis of the causes of the crisis which attributes it to humankind’s failure to “mature”. I compare the idea of “the full world” formulated by the authors of the report with the idea of the “the world come of age” and their diagnosis of “capitalism — short-termism — depletion of resources” with the Kantian assessment of the attempts to escape from the predicaments of the present into the past or the future. I draw attention to Kant’s solutions to some of the specific problems indicated in the report. Instead of the strategy of “return of the cultural mandate”, proposed at this time by the authors of the report, the Kant­ian answer to the crisis is a “Copernican turn” and re-direction of the cultivating effort to the inner moral development of the human being.

Reference

Bacon, F., 1952. Novum Organum. In: F. Bacon, 1952. Advancement of Learning. Novum Organum. New Atlantis. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, pp. 103-195.

Bacon, F., 2011. Valerius Terminus: of the Interpretation of Nature. In: The Works of Francis Bacon. Volume 3. Edited by J. Spedding, R. Ellis and D. Denon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215-253.

Brundtland, G. H, 1987. Our Common Future. Report of UN World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Betz, J., 2012. After Enlightenment: The Post-Secular Vision of J. G. Hamann. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.

Bonhoeffer, D., 2010. Letters and Papers from Prison. In: Dietrich Bonhoeffer Works. Volume 8. Edited by J. W. De Gruchy. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Chernov, S. A. and Shevchenko, I. V., 2010. Fridrikh Yakobi: vera, chuvstvo, razum [Friedrich Jacobi: Faith, Sense, Reason]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. (In Rus.)

Crowe, B., 2023. Jacobi and Philosophy: Rationalism and Skepticism. In: A. J. B. Hampton, ed. 2023. Friedrich Jacobi and the End of the Enlightenment: Religion, Philosophy, and Reason at the Crux of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9-33.

Descartes, R., 1985. Discourse on the Method. Translated by R. Stoothoff. In: R. Descartes, 1985. The Philosophical Writings. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111-151.

Harrison, P., 1999. Subduing the Earth: Genesis 1, Early Modern Science, and the Exploitation of Nature. The Journal of Religion, 79(1), pp. 86-109.

Harrison, P., 2007. The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Howarth, R., 1995. Sustainability under Uncertainty: A Deontological Approach. Land Economics, 71(4), pp. 417-427. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146707

Kant, I., 1992. The Jäsche Logic. In: I. Kant, 1992. Lectures on Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 517-640.

Kant, I., 1996a. An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment? In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-22.

Kant, I., 1996b. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37-108.

Kant, I., 1996c. On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, but It Is of No Use in Practice. In: I. Kant, 1996. Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 273-309.

Kant, I., 1998. What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking? In: I. Kant, 1998. Kant: Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-14.

Kant, I., 2001a. The End of All Things. In: I. Kant, 2001. Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217-231.

Kant, I., 2001b. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. In: I. Kant, 2001. Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39-215.

Kant, I., 2002. On a Recently Prominent Tone of Superiority in Philosophy. In: I. Kant, 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 425-445.

Lahat, G.М., 2013. The Political Implications of Kant’s Theory of Knowledge: Rethinking Progress. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrens III, W. , 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.

Moran, K., 2012. Community and Progress in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.

Mulia, P., Behura, A. and Kar, S., 2018. The Moral Imperatives of Sustainable Development: A Kantian Overview. Problemy Ekorozwoju — Problems of Sustainable Development, 13(2), pp. 77-82.

Pascal, B., 1910. Thoughts. In: B. Pascal, 1910. Thoughts, Letters, and Minor Works. New York: P. F. Collier & Son, pp. 9-321.

Rawls, J., 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sakharov, A. D., 1968. Thoughts on Progress, Peaceful Coexistence and Intellectual Freedom. The New York Times, July 22, p. 14.

Schönfeld, M., 2008. Green Kant: Environmental Dynamics and Sustainable Policies. In: L. P. Pojman and P. Pojman, eds. 2008. Environmental Ethics. Belmont: Thomson-Wadsworth, pp. 49-60.

Startseva, A. and Sabanov, A. O., 2023. Immanuel Kant and the “New Enlightenment”. International Conference Report. Kantian Journal, 42(1), pp. 132-145. http://dx.doi:10.5922/0207-6918-2023-1-7

Voegelin, E., 1952. The New Science of Politics: An Introduction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Weizsäcker, E., 2019. Science and Long-Term Thinking — The Club of Rome, a Club of Long-Term Thinkers. Europhysics News, 50(2), pp. 29-31.

Weizsäcker, E. and Wijkman, A., 2018. Come On! Capitalism, Short-Termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. New York: Springer.

White, L., 1967. The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis. Science, 155(3767), pp. 1203-1207.

Wilford, P. Т. and Stoner, S. А., 2021. Kant and the Possibility of Progress: From Modern Hopes to Postmodern Anxieties. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.