Angiolini vs Kant: Philosophical Endeavour at the Polotsk Jesuit Academy
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2023-1-6
- Pages
- 107-131
Abstract
The movement for the revival of the Scholastic tradition (Neo-Scholasticism) was a reaction to devastating criticism by the representatives of Enlightenment which led to the destruction of traditional metaphysics and of epistemological optimism, the two pillars of European religious philosophy. Reception of Kantian ideas in Neo-Scholasticism varied from total rejection to its use in renewing the philosophical foundation of religious philosophy. In this regard the legacy of the Polotsk Jesuit Academy was one of the first attempts to interpret Kant’s ideas and confront them in the framework of the Scholastic tradition. It is therefore not irrelevant to look at how Kant’s programmatic ideas were perceived at the Polotsk Jesuit Academy, one of the few centres of Jesuit philosophy that survived in the territory of the Russian Empire in the early nineteenth century. The object of this study is the attempt at a critical analysis of Kant made in the Philosophical Instructions for Students at the Polotsk Academy by the Academy’s professor, Giuseppe Angiolini. Angiolini constantly refers to Kant in his reasoning and sees him as his main ideological rival. The ideas articulated in the Philosophical Instructions influenced the philosophical positions of the Academy’s graduates who in turn made a tangible contribution to the development of the Belarusian intellectual tradition. The relationship between Kant’s ideas and the ideas Angiolini drew from the Scholastic tradition is analysed through the use of the concepts that are common to both trends, such as the transcendental, the empirical and the sensible, self-evident truths and common sense.
Reference
Angiolini, J., 1819. Institutiones philosophicae аd usum studiosorum Academiae Polocensis. Polock: Typis Academicis.
Arapov, A.V., 2015. Neoscholasticism: history and basic concepts. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Filosofiya, 3. pp. 51-58. (In Rus.)
Bayer, T. I., 2008. Vico’s Principle of Sensus Communis and Forensic Eloquence. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 83(3), pp. 1131-1155.
Bednarski, S., 1933. Upadek i odrodzenie szkół jezuickich w Polsce: studjum z dziejów kultury i szkolnictwa polskiego. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Księży Jezuitów.
Blinova, T. B., 2002. Iezuity v Belarusi. (Ih rol’ v organizacii obrazovaniya i prosveshcheniya) [Jesuits in Belarus. (Their Role in the Organization of Education and Enlightenment)]. Grodno: GrGU. (In Rus.)
Buczyński, V., 1843 Institutiones philosophicae. Pars prima. Continens logicam cum praevia in universam philosophiam introductione. Viennae: Typis Congregationis Mechitaristicae.
Chmielowski, P., 1883. Liberalizm i obskurantyzm na Litwie i Rusi (1815—1823). Warszawa: Drukarnia artystyczna Saturnina Sikorskiego.
Darowski, R., 2006a. Giuseppe Angiolini SJ (1747—1814), profesor filozofii w Akademii Połockiej. Forum Philosophicum, 11, pp. 223-229. doi:10.35765/forphil.2006.1101.14
Darowski, R., 2006b. Giuseppe (Joseph) Angiolini, S. J. (1747—1814), Professor of Philosophy at The Polotsk Academy. Forum Philosophicum, 11, pp. 230-233. doi:10.35765/forphil.2006.1101.15.
Dvořák, P., 2015. Self-Evident Prepositions in Late Scholasticism: The Case of “God Exists”. Acta Comeniana, 27, pp. 47-73.
Descartes, R., 1998. Discourse on Method. In: R. Descartes, 1998. Discourse on Method; and, Meditations on First Philosophy. Fourth Edition. Translated by D. A. Cress. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 1-44.
Evstigneev, M. D., 2021. What is Kantian Philosophy of Mathematics? An Overview of Contemporary Studies. Kantian Journal, 40(2), pp. 151-178. http://dx.doi:
org/10.5922/0207-6918-2021-2-6
Giżycki, J. M. A., 1905, Materiały do Dziejów Akademii Połockiej і szkół od niej zależnych. Kraków: Druk. W. L. Anczyca i Spółki.
Inglot, M., 2015. How the Jesuits Survived Their Suppression: The Society of Jesus in the Russian Empire (1773-1814). Edited and translated by D. L. Schlafly. Philadelphia: Saint Joseph’s University Press.
Junker-Kenny, M., 2021. Watershed or Cul-de-Sac? Disputes in the Theological Reception of Kant’s Philosophy. Kantian Journal, 40(4), pp. 121-155. http://dx.doi:
org/10.5922/0207-6918-2021-4-5
Kadulska, I., 2014. The Połock Academy (1812-1820): An Example of the Society of Jesus’s Endurance. In: R. A. Maryks and J. Wright, ed. 2014. Jesuit Survival and Restoration: Global History 1773-1900. Leiden: Brill, pp. 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004283879_007
Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgement. Edited by P. Guyer, translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I., 2004. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Translated and edited by G. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuznetsova, I. S., 1980. On the Specifics of Mathematical Concepts. Kantian Journal, 5, pp. 28-38. (In Rus.)
Legchilin, A. A., 2019. German Philosophy in the Intellectual Culture of the North-Western Territory of the Russian Empire: a Historiographic Review In: T. S. Suprankova, ed. 2019. Natsional’nyye kul’tury v mezhkul’turnoy kommunikatsii (Novaya paradigma okhrany kul’turnogo i prirodnogo naslediya) [National Cultures in Intercultural Communication (A New Paradigm for the Protection of Cultural and Natural Heritage)]. Minsk: Kolorgrad, pp. 43-50. (In Rus.)
Legchilin, A. A. and Klimovich, A. I., 2019. Idei neoskholastiki v belorusskom istoriko-kul’turnom prostranstve [Ideas of Neoscholasticism in the Belarusian Historical and Cultural Space]. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya, 2, pp. 4-11. (In Rus.)
Leinsle, U. G., 2016, Ontology and Experience — Rodrigo de Arriaga and Christoph Haunold on the «Species Sensibiles». Filosofický časopis, Special Issue, pp. 103-118.
Littger, K. W., ed. 2005. Kant und der Katholizismus. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Parrier, J. L., 1909. The Revival of Scholastic Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Columbia University Press.
Paulsen, F., 1902. Immanuel Kant: His Life and Doctrine. Translated by A. Lefevre and J. E. Creighton. London: J. C. Nimmo.
Reid, T., 1810. An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. The Sixth Edition. Edinburgh: Bell & Bradtute.
Roothaan, J., 1832. Covered letter to the revised Ratio Studiorum. Available at: https://jesuitportal.bc.edu/research/documents/1832_roothanontheratio/ [accessed: 12. March 2022].
Rumyantseva, T. G., 2021. Kant and His Heritage in Belarusian Philosophy of Soviet and Postsoviet periods. Kantian Journal, 40(3), pp. 127-149. http://dx.doi:
org/10.5922/0207-6918-2021-3-5
Savinov, R. V., 2019. The Rise of the Neo-Scholastic and Neo-Thomist Epistemology (1840—1920). Filosofskii zhurnal / The Philosophy Journal, 12(2), pp. 64-77. http://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2019-12-2-64-77 (In Rus.)
Savinov, R. V., 2021. At the Origins of the Neo-Scholastic Interpretation of Kantianism: From C. Baldinotti to J. Kleutgen. Filosofskii zhurnal / The Philosophy Journal, 14(1), pp. 113-128. http://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2021-14-1-113-128 (In Rus.)
Shalkevich, V. F., 1993. Obshchestvenno-politicheskaya i filosofskaya mysl’ Belarusi v pervoi polovine XIX v.: avtoreferat diss. doktora filosofskih nauk [Socio-Political and Philosophical Thought of Belarus in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century: Summary of the Habilitation (Philosophical Sciences)]. Minsk: BGU. (In Rus.)
Shalkevich, V. F. and Legchilin, A. A., 2005. Reception of I. Kant’s Philosophy in Belarus and Lithuania in the First Third of the 19th Century. In: V. N. Briushinkin, ed. 2005. Kant mezhdu Zapadom i Vostokom. K 200-letiyu so dnya smerti i 280-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Immanuila Kanta [Kant between West and East. On the 200th Anniversary of the Death and 280th Anniversary of the Birth of Immanuel Kant]. Kaliningrad: Russian State University Press, pp. 87-98. (In Rus.)
Zallinger, J. A., 1799. Disquisitiones philosophiae Kantianae. Lib. 1. Augustae Vindelicorum: Vieth & Riegeriana.