Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

2022 Vol. 41. №2

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Babaeva A.V. Guseva L.V. Kim O.M

Semantic and Stylistic Features of Kant’s Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime: The Art of    Seeing and Describing an Object

Abstract

Immanuel Kant’s Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime is examined in the context of the emergence of the epistemological practice of scientific observation. By focusing on the genre-stylistic and semantic-structural features of the text the authors demonstrate the mechanisms of observation as well as the methods of describing the results characteristic of mid-eighteenth century science. The authors consider Kant’s treatise to be a hybrid text: on the one hand, it attests to the importance of the natural science paradigm and the degree of its influence on the humanities in the modern period; and, on the other hand, it bears witness to the multi-genre character of philosophical treatises, combining as they do the considered and serious wisdom of philosophy, the precision of scientific terminology and the figurativeness of a work of fiction. Kant is perceived not only as a researcher and philosopher capable of bringing out the essence of the particular and changeable captured in observation, but as a writer with a consummate command of the apparatus for keeping the reader’s attention through linguistic devices and practices of image-creating. The authors demonstrate how the categories of the “beautiful” and “sublime” become a general framework for the description of the moral and mental properties of human nature. The authors show that Kant’s use of “aesthetic” wording in the title of his treatise does not announce that his aim is analysis of artistic perception and practices, but mainly refers to the form of his anthropological study and conceptualisation of scientific knowledge. Kant has transferred the technique of visualisation from natural sciences to the objects of philosophical inquiry, thus contributing to the development in the humanities of representative practices, the scientific method of observation as well as the corresponding epistemic and literary genre.

Full text

json#{"TEXT":"","TYPE":"HTML"}

Reference

Baecker, D., 2013. Foreword: A Mathematics of Form, a Sociology of Observers. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 20(3-4), pp. 5-8.

Baeva, A. V., 2019. Historization of Scientific Observation in Modern Science Research. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 56(4), pp. 46-61. (In Rus.)

Chernenok, I. G., 2005. Sposoby vyrazhenija argumentacii v jetiko-filosofskom diskurse I. Kanta: Na materiale proizvedenij “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”, “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft” i “Metaphysik der Sitten” [Ways of Expressing Argumentation in the Ethical-Philosophical Discourse of I. Kant: On the Material of the Works Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft and Metaphysik der Sitten]. Dissertation. Kaliningrad: s.n. (In Rus.).

Chernenok, I. G., 2017. Linguistic Paradigm in Kant Studies. Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent, 8(2), pp. 114-123. (In Rus.)

Daston, L., 2011. The Empire of Observation, 1600-1800. In: L. Daston and E. Lunbeck, eds. 2011. Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 81—113.

Foucault, M., 1978. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. Translated by A. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books.

Gavrilenko, S. M., 2017. Historical Epistemology: the Zone of Uncertainty and the Space of Theoretical Imagination. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 52(2), pp. 20-28. (In Rus.)

Ginzburg, C., 2004. The Evidence-based Paradigm and Its Signs. In: C. Ginzburg. Mify — emblemy — primety [Myths — Emblems — Signs]. Moscow: New Publishing House, pp. 189-241. (In Rus.)

Goldthwait, J. T., 1960. Translator’s Introduction. In: I. Kant, 1960. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime. Translated by J. T. Goldthwait. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1-38.

Gulyga, A. V., 1977. Kant. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya. (In Rus.)

Kant, I., 2011. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime. In: I. Kant, 2011. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings. Ed. by P. Frierson and P. Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13-62.

Koptsev, I. D., 1993. Kant i problemy lingvistiki filosofskogo teksta [Kant and Problems of Linguistics of the Philosophical Text]: Synopsis of the PhD Dissertation. St. Petersburg: s.n. (In Rus.)

Koptsev, I. D., 2010. To the Subject-Speech Structure of I. Kant’s Axiological Discourse. Kantian Journal, 2(32), pp. 60-68. (In Rus.)

Kuehn, М., 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Latour, B., 1986. Visualization and Cognition: Drawing Things Together. In: H. Kuklick, ed. 1986. Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present. Volume 6. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, pp. 1-40.

Meerovsky, B. V., 1985. I. Kant and English Aesthetics of the 18th century. Kantian Journal, 1(10), pp. 51-57. (In Rus.)

Narsky, I. S., 1985. Philosophical and Aesthetic Ideas of A. Baumgarten as One of the Incentives for Kant’s Theoretical Formation. Kantian Journal, 1(10), pp. 40-51. (In Rus.)

Nikonova, S. B. 2012. Kant’s Philosophy and the Foundations of the Process of Aestheticization in Modern Culture. Kantian Journal, 1(39), pp. 45-54. (In Rus.)

Ricoeur, P., 2004. Memory, History, Forgetting. Translated by K. Blamey and D. Pellauer. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

Rorty, R., 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Shell, S. M., 2002. Kant as Propagator: Reflections on “Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime”. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 35(3), pp. 455-468.

Soboleva, M. E., 2018. How Do We Read Kant, or Kant in the Context of Contemporary Epistemological Discussions in Western Analytic Kant-Studies. Voprosy filosofii, 3, pp. 129-140. (In Rus.)

Sologubov, A. M., 2004. Model of the World and the Last Foundations of Argumentation (On the Example of Kant’s Texts). In: V. N. Bryushinkin, ed. 2004. Modeli mira. Issledovanija po logike, argumentacii i istorii filosofii [Models of the World. Studies in Logic, Argumentation and the History of Philosophy]. Kaliningrad: KGU, pp. 109-119. (In Rus.)

Sudakov, A. K., 2017. Philosophy of Love in the Observations of the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime. Philosophy and Culture, 2, pp. 136-150. (In Rus.)

Tausneva, A. S., 2016. The Aesthetic Theory of I. Kant in the Light of the Hermeneutic Project of H.-G. Gadamer. Kantian Journal, 2(56), pp. 67-72. (In Rus.)

Volzhin, S. V., 2017. Sublime and Violence. The Ethos of the Sublime in M. Luther and I. Kant. Christian Reading, 4, pp. 327-343. (In Rus.)

Zammito, J. H., 2002. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Zilber, A. S., 2016a. Knowing People without Knowing a Human Being: The Structure of Polemics in Kant’s Political Argument. Kantian Journal, 3(57), pp. 28-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2016-3-3 (In Rus.)

Zilber, A., 2016b. „Zum Geständnisse zu bringen“: Wahrheit, Glückseligkeit und Publizität bei Kant. Con-Textos Kantianos, 4, pp. 70-88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.163990.

Zilber, A. S., 2020. Polemika v politicheskoj filosofii Kanta: istoriko-filosofskij kontekst [Polemics in Kant’s Political Philosophy: Historical and Philosophical Context]. Dissertation. Kaliningrad: s.n. (In Rus.).

Zilber, A. S., 2021. Mechanisms, Bees, Forest: Kant’s Political and Anthropological Metaphors and Their Meaning. In: A. V. Smirnov, ed. 2021. Vos’moj Rossijskij Filosofskij Kongress “Filosofija v policentrichnom mire”. Sekcii (I) [Eighth Russian Philosophical Congress “Philosophy in a Polycentric World”. Sections (I)]. Moscow: Logos, pp. 599-602. (In Rus.)