Search
Submit an article
Kantian Journal

2019 Vol. 38. №4

Back to the list Download the article
Igor K. Kalinin

Darwinism as the Missing Link in Kant’s Critical Philosophy

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2019-4-3
Pages
51-80
Kant Konrad Lorenz Nicolai Hartmann transcendental philosophy evolutionary epistemology categories synthetic judgment a priori adaptation

Abstract

I proceed from the hypothesis that the difficulties in Kant’s presentation of his plan and, accordingly, the implicit reason for the critical attitude to this plan on the part of many contemporary philosophers stem from the fact that he had no theoretical link at his disposal which would offer a more solid scientific grounding for his entire system. I believe that Darwinism is such a link which bolsters the central but ungrounded thesis of the Critique of Pure Reason on the existence of a priori synthetic judgments. The synthesis of Darwinism and critical philosophy dictates, however, a substantial restructuring of the latter since some of its key elements prove to be weak in the light of modern studies and need to be revised or even reversed. The first reversal explored in this article determines the origin of the categories which are now revealed not “from the top down” where Kant sought them, i. e. not in logical functions in accordance with metaphysical deduction and not in self-consciousness as transcendental deduction claims, but “from the bottom up” if one considers things in the evolutionary dimension, i. e. in the instincts. The second reversal shifts the freedom of will which Kant placed in the same ontological basket with things in themselves at “the top,” to another level of the pyramid of ontologies, by changing dualism to pluralism because dualism is too narrow to accommodate all the autonomous components of critical philosophy. Thus spirit and freedom find a new place separate from the sphere of physical nature; the category of adaptation explains how different ontologies can coexist; while the problem of two interpretations of transcendental idealism (two-world vs. two-aspect interpretation) finds a solution through their reconciliation.

Reference

Allison, H. E., 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defence. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.

Arnauld, A. and Nicole, P., 1996. Logic, or, The Art of Thinking: Containing, Besides Common Rules, Several New Observations Appropriate for Forming Judgment. Translated and edited by J. V. Buroker. 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bradie, M. and Harms, W., 2016. Evolutionary Epistemology. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [online] Avaliable at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/&gt; [Accessed 27 May 2019].

Bulgakov, S. N., 1990. Filosofia hozyaistva [Philosophy of Economy]. Moscow: Nauka (In Rus.)

Campbell, D. T., 1959. Methodological Suggestions from a Comparative Psychology of Knowledge Processes. Inquiry, 2, pp. 152-182.

Dawkins, R., 1999. The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gontier, N., 2019. Evolutionary Epistemology. In: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [online] Avaliable at: <https://www.iep.utm.edu/evo-epis/&gt; [Accessed 27 May 2019].

Hanna, R., 2005. Kant and Nonconceptual Content. European Journal of Philosophy, 13(2), pp. 247-290.

Hanna, R., 2008. Kant in the Twentieth Century. In: Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Edited by D. Moran. New York: Routledge, pp. 149-203.

Hartmann, N., 1953. New Ways of Ontology. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

Hartmann, R.A., 2017. The Evolution of Epistemology to Evolutionary Epistemology: Two Modern Re-Interpretations of Immanuel Kant’s Fundamental Principles of Transcendental Philosophy. Edinburgh: HARALEX Publishing House.

Howell, R., 2013. Kant and Kantian Themes in Recent Analytic Philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 44(1-2), pp. 42-47.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lorenz, K., 1977. Behind the Mirror: A Search for a Natur­al History of Human Knowledge. Translated by R. Taylor. New York & London: Methuen; Harvest / HBJ.

Lorenz, K., 2009. Kant’s Doctrine of the A Priori in the Light of Contemporary Biology. In: M. Ruse, ed. 2009. Philo­s­ophy after Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, рp. 231-247.

Maddy, P., 2007. Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oberst, M., 2015. Two Worlds and Two Aspects: on Kant’s Distinction between Things in Themselves and Appearances. Kantian review, 20(1), pp. 53-75.

Poli, R., 2017. Nicolai Hartmann. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [online] Avaliable at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/nicolai-hartmann/&gt; [Accessed 27 May 2019].

Popper, K., 1994. Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, C. U. M., 1991. Kant and Darwin. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 14(1), pp. 35-50.

Strawson, P. F., 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London and New York: Routledge.

Toulmin, S., 1972. Human Understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Van Cleve, J., 1999. Problems from Kant. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.