The Notion of Free Will in Sergey Hessen’s Conception of Culture :: IKBFU's united scientific journal editorial office

×

Login
Password
Forgot your password?
Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services:
   
Science is power, it reveals the relation between things, their laws and interactions
Alexander Herzen

DOI-generator Search by DOI on Crossref.org

The Notion of Free Will in Sergey Hessen’s Conception of Culture

KeywordsSergey Hessen, Heinrich Rickert, value, individual, society, free will, culture, law, communication
ArticleDownload
AuthorZagirnyak, M. Yu.
Pages67-82
DOI10.5922/0207-6918-2018-4-3
Abstract (summary) Sergey Hessen builds his philosophy of culture on Heinrich Rickert’s theory of values. Like Rickert, he believes that the individual plays a key role in the formation of culture. The individual exercises freedom only in creative activity and the degree to which he fulfils his creative potential depends not only on the cultural context in which it happens, but also on the regulation of the opportunities for self-actualisation in any given society. Accordingly, Hessen defines society as the sphere of communication among a multitude of individuals whose creative activities serve to continue the process of culture-structuring. Thus the effectiveness of the realisation of values in cultural reality depends directly on ensuring the conditions for the exercise of free will. There is potentially an unlimited number of ways of defining the concept of free will, each imposing certain limitations on the actualisation of the individual in culture. The question arises, how does each individual understand the possibility of creative activities within a concrete culture and what permits him to determine the vectors of self-actualisation? In seeking an answer to this question Hessen resorts to the dialectical method as a universal formal instrument for assessing the development of culture. What enables Hessen to overcome in theory the fragmentation of culture into a multitude of variations of actualisation of free will is the interpretation of the common will as a continuously renewed result of interaction among a multitude of individuals. An individual, according to Hessen, can understand his own past as a continuity only by comparing its component social practices to something that transcends his goals and that is not reduced to a fragment of personal being.
References Bambach, C., 2009. Neo-Kantianism. In: A. Tucker, ed. 2009. A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 477-487.
Belov, V. N., 2016. (Book Review) Yu. Melikh. Irrational Expansion of Kant’s Philosophy in Russia. Kantian Journal, 4(35), pp. 103-105. (In Russ.)
Crowe, B., 2010. Faith and Value: Heinrich Rickert’s Theory of Religion. Journal of the History of Ideas, 4(41), pp. 617-636.
Dmitrieva, N. A., 2013. The Concept of A priori in German and Russian Neo-Kantianism. Mnogoobrazie apriori. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii na filosofskom fakultete RGGU 19-20 Aprelya 2012 [The Variety of A Priori. Proceedings of the International Conference in the Faculty of Philosophy of the Russian State University for the Humanities on April 19-20, 2012]. M.: “Kanon+” ROOI “Rehabilitation”, pp. 129-147. (In Russ.)
Dmitrieva, N. A., Vorobiev, M. V. and Mironova, K. Yu., 2017. Man in History and Culture: Forgotten Pages of Russian Neo-Kantianism. Russian Foundation for Basic Research Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(88), pp. 94-102. (In Russ.)
Eco, U., 2002. Migration, Tolerance and Intolerance. In: U. Eco, 2002. Five Moral Pieces. Translated by A. McEwen. New York & San Diego & London: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, pp. 89-111.
Hans, N., 1950. Sergius Hessen. The Slavonic and East European Review, 72(29), pp. 296-298.
Hardtwig, W., 2009. Macht, Emotion und Geselligkeit. Studien zur Soziabilität in Deutschland 1500-1900. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. 
Hessen, S. I., 1909. Herzen. In: R. Kroner, N. Bubnoff, G. Mehlis, S. Hessen, F. Steppuhn,  1909. Vom Messias: kulturphilosophische Essays. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 42-59.
Hessen, S. I., 1924. The Collapse of Utopianism. Sovremennye zapiski / Annales Contemporaines, 19, pp. 277-295. (In Russ.)
Hessen, S. I., 1924—1927. The Problem of Legal Socialism (Evolution of Liberalism). Sovremennye zapiski / Annales contemporaines, 22, pp. 257-293; 23, pp. 313-342; 27, pp. 382-430; 28, pp. 299-345; 29, pp. 308-342; 30, pp. 380-409; 31, pp. 328-358. (In Russ.)
Hessen, S. I., 1932. The Idea of Social Right. Sovremennye zapiski / Annales Contemporaines, 49, pp. 421-435.
Hessen, S. I., 1935. True about Democracy. Sovremennye zapiski / Annales Contemporaines, 58, pp. 361-377. (In Russ.)
Hessen, S. I., 1948. The Rights of Man in Liberalism, Socialism and Communism. In: UNESCO, ed. 1948. Human Rights: Comments and Interpretations. A Symposium edited by UNESCO (Paris, 25 July 1948). Paris: UNESCO, pp. 99-130. 
Hessen, S., 1968. Studia z filozofii kultury, wybór i opracowanie. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Hessen, S. I., 1995. Osnovy pedagogiki. Vvedenie v prikladnuyu filosofiyu. [Principals of Pedagogy. Introduction to Applied Philosophy]. M: School-press. (In Russ.)
Hessen, S. I., 1999a. The Idea of the Nation. In: S. I. Hessen, 1999. Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected Writings]. M: ROSSPEN, pp. 78-105. (In Russ.)
Hessen, S. I., 1999b. My Biography. In: S. I. Hessen, 1999. Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected Writings]. M: ROSSPEN, pp. 723-782. (In Russ.)
Hessen, S. I., 1999c. Political Freedom and Socialism. In: S. I. Hessen, 1999. Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected Writings]. M: ROSSPEN, pp. 106-144. (In Russ.)
Hessen, S. I., 1999d. State of Law and Socialism. In: S. I. Hessen, 1999. Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected Writings]. M: ROSSPEN, pp. 147-542. (In Russ.)
Hessen, S. I., 2011. Modern Democracy. Translated by N. V. Danilkina. Kantian Journal, 3(37), pp. 93-97. (In Russ.)
Hessen, S. I., 2012. Modern Democracy. Translated by N. V. Danilkina. Kantian Journal, 1(39), pp. 75-84. (In Russ.)
Masłowski, A., 1982. Sergiusz Hessen — filozof kultury. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Nauki Humanistyczno-Społeczne. Filozofia, 6 (130), pp. 87-98.
Rickert, H., 1910—1911. Vom Begriff der Philosophie. Logos: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie der Kultur, 1, pp. 1-34.
Rickert, H., 1915. Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. 3rd ed. rev. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
Styczyński, M., 2004. Sergei Hessen, Neo-Kantian: Dedicated to Professor Andrzej Walicki. Studies in East European Thought, 1(56), pp. 55-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SO VI.0000007365.04004.5b.
Vorobiev, M. V., 2017. The Philosophical and Legal Content of Sergey Hessen’s Concept of Personality. Kantian Journal, 2(36), pp. 73-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2017-2-6. (In Russ.)
Walicki, A., 1987. The Legal Philosophies of Russian Liberalism. New York: Clarendon Press of Oxford University Press.
Withington, P., 2007. Company and Sociability in Early Modern England. Social History, 3(32), pp. 291-307.
Zagirnyak, M. Yu., 2017. Hegel’s Dialectic in Political Philosophy of Sergius Hessen. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy,

Back to the section