Kant’s fundamental idea of state and law in Pushkin’s Boris Godunov
- DOI
- 10.5922/0207-6918-2016-4-1
- Pages
- 7-23
Abstract
The tragedy Boris Godunov occupies a unique place in A. S. Pushkin’s oeuvre. It was a turning point, when the author needed the whole power of his poetical genius, when a work beyond traditional literary and aesthetic styles, which interchange and establish a canon of a new style that transforms its predecessors in an act of creativity, appeared in Russian culture. Boris Godunov marked the birth of an individual author’s style in Russian art. A unique literary world — the world of Pushkin — manifested itself in a work of art. This article sets out to prove the influence of Kant’s philosophical and legal ideas on A. S. Pushkin during the poet’s work on Boris Godunov. Kant’s thought that the people is the only monarch and that legislative power is vested in it in a rule-of-law state is the central idea of the tragedy. When working on Boris Godunov, Pushkin not only studied the Critique of Judgement but he also read Kant’s works on epistemological theory. In his tragedy, Pushkin was guided by Kant’s ideas of state and law and strived to make it obvious that the people is the only monarch and source of political and legislative power. The tragedy of the people is that it does not know it and the mission of the educated class is to make the people aware of its powers and educate it. Law cannot exist beyond the people’s consciousness — everything else is despotism and a tyranny.
Reference
1. Alekseev M. P., 1984, K istochnikam «Podrazhanij drevnim» Pushkina // Alekseev M. P. Pushkin. Sravnitel'no-istoricheskie issledovaniya [Pushkin. Comparative historical research]. Leningrad, «Nauka».
2. Androsov V. P., 1979, Zamechaniya na pribavleniya k stat'e o filosofii // Voprosy teoreticheskogo naslediya Immanuila Kanta. Vyp. 4 [Questions theoretical legacy of Immanuel Kant. Vol. 4], Kaliningrad.
3. Blagoj D. D., 1950, Tvorcheskij put' Pushkina (1813—1826) [Creative way of Pushkin (1813—1826)]. Moscow-Leningrad, USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing.
4. Vinokur G. O., 1999, Kommentarii k «Borisu Godunovu» A. S. Pushkina [Comments to "Boris Godunov" A. S. Pushkin]. Moscow.
5. Gukovskij G. A., 1957, Pushkin i problemy realisticheskogo stilya [Pushkin and the problems of realistic style]. Moscow.
6. Kalinnikov L. A., 2012, E. T. A. Gofman i I. Kant. Preodolenie romantizma [E. T. A. Hoffmann and I. Kant. Overcoming Romantic]. Kaliningrad.
7. Kant, I. 1966, Otvet na vopros: chto takoye Prosveshcheniye [Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment?], in Kant, I. Sobranie sochineniy v 6 tomah [Collected works in 6 volumes], vol. 6, Moscow.
8. Kant, I. 1965, Metafizika nravov [The metaphysics of morals], in Kant, I. Sobranie sochineniy v 6 tomah [Collected works in 6 volumes], vol. 4(2), Moscow.
9. Markov A., 2009, Kant v russkoj poehzii (rec.) // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2009, № 95 [New Literary Review, 2009, № 95].
10. Pushkin A. S., 2001, Poln. sobr. soch. v odnom tome [Complete Works in One Volume]. Moscow.
11. Snyadeckij Yan, 1979, Obshchie zamechaniya po predmetu nauki ob ume chelovecheskom i obshchij vzglyad na sostav Kantovoj nauki // Voprosy teoreticheskogo
naslediya Immanuila Kanta. Vyp. 4 [Questions theoretical legacy of Immanuel Kant. Vol. 4], Kaliningrad.
12. Tomashevskij B. V., 1956, Pushkin. Kn. Pervaya (1813—1824) [Pushkin. The first ыbook (1813—1824)]. Moscow-Leningrad, USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing.