Kantian Journal

2016 Issue №3(57)

Back to the list Download an article

On the role of religion in N. N. Alekseev’s axiological model of law

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2016-3-5
Pages
58-67

Abstract

This paper is devoted to investigation of destination of religion in the process of forming of the concept of law in determined cultural circumstances. This study is actualizes the essential link between comprehension of content of domain of law and concept of subjectivity. Nikolay Alexeev overcomes concept of subjectivity represented in philosophy of early modern period of European history, (primarily in the rationalistic tradition of Rene Descartes). The crucial significant in his concept of law is got neo-kantian axiology of Wilhelm Windelband and Heinrich Rickert. Following to neo-kantian thinkers Alexeev indicates, that genesis of culture is measured because a priori values are exist. Therefore individual is not a creator of these values per se. Value became the basis of Alexeev’s philosophy of law. Furthermore he elaborated axiological model of law onto religious foundation. Religion — is a tool for initiating condition of values and there setting in political domain. Paper argued how religion conducts genesis of law. In that sense religion evaluated like a link between morality and law. Essential item of philosophy of law of Nikolay Alexeev — is a superiority of Christianity in the midst of couple of religions in solution of problem in development of law. Author shows the historical role of Christianity in revealing of the idea of law per se.

Reference

1. Alexeev, N. N. 1918, Vvedenie v izuchenie prava [Introduction to the study of law], Moscow, 188 p.
2. Alexeev, N. N. 1919a, Obshhee uchenie o prave. Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Tavricheskom Universitete v 1918—19 godu. [The general theory of law. The course of lectures in Tavrichesky University in 1918—19.], Simferopol, 162 p.
3. Alexeev, N. N. 1919b, Ocherki po obshhej teorii gosudarstva. Osnovnye predposylki i gipotezy gosudarstvennoj nauki [Essays on the general theory of the state. Basic assumptions and hypotheses of the state of science]. Moscow, 209 p.
4. Alexeev, N. N. 1929, Evrazijstvo i marksizm [Eurasianism and Marxism] // Evrazijskij Sbornik Kn. VI [Eurasian Miscellany. Vol. VI], Prague, p. 7—17.
5. Alexeev, N. N. 1930, Religija, pravo i nravstvennost' [Religion, law, and morality], Paris, 106 p.
6. Alexeev, N. N. 1955, Ideja gosudarstva: Ocherki po istorii politicheskoj mysli [The idea of the State: Essays on the history of political thought] New York, 412 p. 
7. Alexeev, N. N. 1998a, Na putiakh k budushchei Rossii [On the way to the future Russia], Russkii narod i gosudarstvo [Russian nation and the state], Moscow, p. 282—371.
8. Alexeev, N. N. 1998b, Sovremennoe polozhenie nauki o gosudarstve i ee blizhajshie zadachi [The current situation and immediate objectives of the science of the state], Russkii narod i gosudarstvo [Russian nation and the state], Moscow, p. 386—624.
9. Benoist, A. 2015, Po tu storonu prav cheloveka. V zashhitu svobod [On the other side of human rights. In defense of liberties], Moscow, 144 p. 
10. Bykova, M. F. 1996, Misterija logiki i tajna sub’ektivnosti. O zamysle fenomenologii i logiki u Gegelja [The Mystery of logic and secret of subjectivity. About Hegel’s conception of phenomenology and logic], Moscow, 238 p.
11. Carraud, V., 2012, Vopros kto? Ego i Dasein [The question Who? Ego and Dasein], Subektivnost' i identichnost': kollekt. monogr. [Subjectivity And Identity: joint study], Moscow, p. 80—100.
12. Renaut, A. 2002, Jera individa. K istorii sub’ektivnosti [The era of the individual. To the history of of subjectivity], Saint Petersburg, 470 p.
13. Saul, J. 2007, Ubljudki Vol'tera. Diktatura razuma na Zapade [Voltaire's Bastards: The Dictatorship of Reason in the West], Moscow, 895 p.
14. Pantykina, M. I. 2010, A. Rajnah i N. N. Alekseev: dva proekta fenomenologii prava [A. Reinach and N. N. Alekseev: Two Projects of Phenomenology of the Law], Vestnik Gumanitarnogo instituta TGU [Gazette of Institute of Humanities of Togliatti State University], no. 1, Togliatti, p. 7—13.
15. Spengler, O. 1998, Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoj istorii. T. 1. Geshtal't i dejstvitel'nost' [The Decline of the West: Outlines of a Morphology of world history. Vol. 1. Gestalt and reality], Moscow, 663 p.
16. Griffiths J. 1986 What Is Legal Pluralism, Journal of Legal Pluralism, no. 24, p. 1—55, available at:https://books.google.fr/books?id=6lABLiMHqPcC&dq=isbn:3825844927&hl=ru (accessed 29 September 2015).
17. Moore, S. F. 1978, Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach, London; Boston: Routledge & K. Paul, available at: https://books.google.fr/books?id=6lABLiMHqPcC&dq=isbn:3825844927&hl=ru (accessed 29 September 2015).