Search
Submit an article
Kantian Journal

2025 Vol. 44. №1

Back to the list Download the article
Rumyantseva T.G.

Plekhanov as “Defender” of Kant from Neo-Kantians

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2025-1-4
Pages
89-106
Plekhanov Neo-Kantianism Kant Marxism materialism idealism Windelband Rickert

Abstract

The history of the reception and interpretation of Neo-Kantian ideas in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries shows the special role played by those who took a negative stand with regard to Neo-Kantianism and sought to dissociate it from and oppose it to Kant’s legacy. A prominent place among the latter was occupied by Georgy V. Plekhanov, most of whose works were fiercely polemical. Highly rating Kant’s works, in which he even found some coincidences with materialism, Plekhanov for a number of years engaged in polemics on philosophical and political issues with the German Neo-Kantians and Eduard Bernstein, who shared many of their views. Calling Neo-Kantianism, after Friedrich Engels, “a step backwards” from Kant’s philosophy, he argued that Neo-Kantians had misunderstood Kant’s philosophy and, in advocating a return to Kant’s theoretical philosophy in order to use it to refute contemporary materialism, had distorted Kant’s doctrine. Plekhanov’s so-called “defence” of Kant against Neo-Kantians should not be understood and accepted literally. Being a Marxist, Plekhanov tried to defend above all the views of Marx and Engels by revealing the flaws in the Neo-Kantian interpretation of Kant. Although he himself in some ways misinterpreted Kant, his views command some interest today because many of them played a certain role in the perception of Kant in the Soviet and post-Soviet times and were reflected in the discussions of the Kantian philosophy as a whole, especially its fundamental concept of the “thing-in-itself”.

Reference

Belov, V. N., 2012. Russian Neo-Kantianism: History and Peculiarities of Development. Kantian Journal, 39(1), pp. 27-39. (In Rus.)

Chaly, V., 2018. Kantianism and Anti-Kantianism in Russian Revolutionary Thought. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 8, pp. 218-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2331766

Dmitrieva, N. A., 2007a. Philosophy of Humanism and Enlightenment: Criteria, Specificity, and Problems of Russian Neo-Kantianism. Filosofskie nauki, 1, pp. 101-119. (In Rus.)

Dmitrieva, N. A., 2007b. Russkoe neokantianstvo: “Marburg” v Rossii [Russian Neo-Kantianism: “Marburg” in Russia]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Rus.)

Dynnik, M., 1939. Neo-Kantianism. In: O. Ju. Shmidt, ed. 1939. Bol’shaja sovetskaja jenciklopedija [Big Soviet Encyclopedia]. Volume 41. Moscow: OGIZ RSFSR, pp. 634-639. (In Rus.)

Engels, F., 1990a. Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy. In: K. Marx and F. Engels, 1990. Collected Works. Volume 26. Engels: 1882-1889. London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 353-398.

Engels, F., 1990b. Introduction to the English Edition (1892) of Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. In: K. Marx and F. Engels, 1990. Collected Works. Volume 27. Engels: 1890-1895. London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 278-302.

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by P. Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 2004. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics that Will be Able to Come forward as Science. In: I. Kant, 2004. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Translated by G. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-170.

Krouglov, A. N., 2024. Filosofija Kanta v Rossii. [Kant’s Philosophy in Russia]. Kaliningrad: IKBFU Press. (In Rus.)

Lenin, V. I., 1976. Conspectus of Hegel’s Book The Science of Logic. In: V. I. Lenin, 1976. Collected Works. Fourth Edition. Volume 38: Philosophical Notebooks. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 85-237.

Livshic, G. M., 1981. Kritika idealizma i religii v trudah G. V. Plehanova [Critique of Idealism and Religion in the Works of G. V. Plekhanov]. Minsk: Vyshjejshaja shkola. (In Rus.)

Marx, K. and Engels, F., 1990. The German Ideology. In: K. Marx and F. Engels, 1990. Collected Works. Volume 5. Marx and Engels: 1845—1847. London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 19-539.

Oizerman, T. I., 2005. Opravdanie revizionizma [Justification of Revisionism]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitacija”. (In Rus.)

Oizerman, T. I., 2008. Kant i Gegel’ (opyt sravnitel’nogo issledovanija) [Kant and Hegel (A Comparative Study)]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitacija”. (In Rus.)

Pereira, S. R., 2019. The Real Target of Kant’s Refu­tation. Kantian Journal, 38(3), pp. 7-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2019-3-1

Plekhanov, G. V., 1976a. Materialism or Kantianism. In: G. Plekhanov, 1976. Selected Philosophical Works, Volume 2. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 398-414. (In Rus.)

Plekhanov, G. V., 1976b. Conrad Schmidt versus Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. In: G. Plekhanov, 1976. Selected Philosophical Works, Volume 2. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 379-397.

Plekhanov, G. V., 1976c. On the Alleged Crisis in Marxism. In: G. Plekhanov, 1976. Selected Philosophical Works, Volume 2. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 315-325.

Plekhanov, G. V., 1976d. Bernstein and Materialism. In: G. Plekhanov, 1976. Selected Philosophical Works, Volume 2. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 326-339.

Plekhanov, G. V., 1976e. Cant against Kant. In: G. Ple­khanov, 1976. Selected Philosophical Works, Volume 2. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 352-378.

Plekhanov, G. V., 1976f. On Mr Windelband’s Book. In: G. Plekhanov, 1976. Selected Philosophical Works, Volume 3. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 419-423.

Plekhanov, G. V., 1976g. On Mr Heinrich Rickert’s Book. In: G. Plekhanov, 1976. Selected Philosophical Works, Volume 3. Moscow: Progress Publishers, pp. 481-486.

Rickert, H., 1911. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul’ture [Sciences of Nature and Sciences of Culture]. Translated by S. Gessen. Saint-Petersburg: Obrazovanie. (In Rus.)

Rumyantseva, T. G., 2023. I. Kant’s Philosophy as a Subject of Plekhanov’s Polemics with the Leaders of the Second International. In: G. Ch. Lyankevich and A. Ju. Dudchik, 2023. Tret’i mezhdunarodnye plehanov­skie chteniya [The Third International Plekhanov Readings]. Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika, pp. 35-44. (In Rus.)

Steila, D., 1991. Genesis and Development of Plekhanov’s Theory of Knowledge: A Marxist Between Anthropological Materialism and Physiology. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.

Windelband, W., 1910. Filosofija v nemeckoj dukhovnoj zhizni XIX stoletija [Philosophy in the German Spiritual Life of the Twentieth Century]. Translated by M. M. Rubinstein. Moscow: Zveno. (In Rus.)