Search
Submit an article RU
Kantian Journal

2025 Vol. 44. №1

Back to the list Download the article
ENG
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
RUS
Сохранить XML для: JATS (вып.)
Sirotkina L.S.

Wanderings in Syllogistic Figures: On Kant’s Possible Cognitive Syllogistics

DOI
10.5922/0207-6918-2025-1-1
Pages
7-39
Kant pre-critical period “The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures” logical procedure syllogism cognitive syllogistics

Abstract

Kant’s treatise “The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures” has logical, epistemological, and cognitive-psychological implications. These three perspectives on his conclusions are practically undifferentiated. The first part of this article discusses the logical and ontological-gnoseological content of the treatise in order to reveal the prerequisites for the cognitive interpretation of syllogisms. The second part is an attempt to explicate the treatise’s cognitive content, i.e. a systemic representation of the cognitive properties of syllogisms, as understood by Kant. Kant’s syllogism is characterised as an intellectual act aimed at eliminating opaqueness in cognition and consists of several mental procedures. The cognitive properties of syllogisms are discoverable in Kant’s general characterisation of syllogisms, as well as in the characteristic marks of individual figures. The third part is an attempt to reconstruct Kant’s cognitive syllogistics from angles which can be discerned, but are not explicitly discussed, in the treatise. This reconstruction is based on the distinction Kant draws between two modes of formulating conclusions, one of which is “in the form of judgements”. Here, formal and “ontological” syllogisms are distinguished by the type of relation that obtains between parts of the premises. An ontological syllogism, unlike the formal kind, conforms to the most stringent rules in terms of content. The procedure of making an inference, even according to a perfect figure, is described as ‘composite’, involving, as it does, the transformation of a formal syllogism into an ontological one, or the supplementing of the formal syllogism with an intermediate inference which brings the parts of the syllogism under the categories contained in the highest rules. Errors in inferences in individual cognition are attributed to the use of the “form of judgements”, which obscures the connections that must be clearly understood according to the highest rules. In conclusion, the author systematically presents the cognitive content of the treatise and outlines cognitive pathways that are generated by the ideas of “The False Subtlety” and connected with the study of the unfolding of syllogisms in cognitive reality.

Reference

Aristotle, 2009. Prior Analytics. Book I. Translated by Gisela Striker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Baumeister, F. Ch., 1747. Elementa philosophiae recentioris usibus iuventutis scholasticae accommodata. Leipzig: Gleditsch.

Bryushinkin, V. N., 1986. Kant and Syllogistics. Some thoughts about “The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures”. Kantian Journal, 11, pp. 29-38. (In Rus.)

Bryushinkin, V. N., 2004. Kant’s Metapsychologism. Kantian Journal, 24, pp. 65-73. (In Rus.)

Besler, A., 2022. Pre-Critical Kant on Traditional Logic: What is the Mistake in Syllogistic Theory? Temaşa Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi, 17, рр. 192-204. https://doi.org/10.55256/temasa.1112423

Crusius, Ch. А., 1762. Weg zur Gewißheit und Zuverläßigkeit der menschlichen Erkenntniß. Leipzig: Gleditsch.

Dalla Rosa, D., 2020. On Rules of Inference in Kant’s Logic. Estudos Kantianos, 8(1), pp. 85-100. https://doi.org/10.36311/2318-0501.2020.v8n1.07.p85

Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I., 1992a. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by J. M. Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. 1992b. The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures Demonstrated by M. Immanuel Kant. In: I. Kant, 1992. Theoretical philosophy, 1755—1790. Translated and edited by D. Walford. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85-106.

Krouglov A. N., 2021a. The Teaching of Reason by Christian Thomasius. In: A.N. Krouglov, ed. 2021. “Venskaya logika” I. Kanta [“The Vienna Logic” by I. Kant]. Moscow: Kanon+, pp. 12-30. (In Rus.)

Krouglov, A. N., 2021b. Frontispieces in German Enlightenment Logic Textbooks as Programmatic Visual Aids. Logiko-filosofskie shtudii [Logico-Philosophical Studies], 19(1), pp. 12-90. https://doi.org/10.52119/LPHS.2021.54.16.002 (In Rus.)

Krouglov A. N., 2021c. Christian Wolff’s Logic. In: A. N. Krouglov, ed. 2021. “Venskaya logika” I. Kanta [“The Vienna Logic” by I. Kant]. Moscow: Kanon+, pp. 12-30. (In Rus.)

Lambert, J. H., 1764. Neues Organon oder Gedanken über die Erforschung und Bezeichnung des Wahren und dessen Unterscheidung vom Irrthum und Schein. Leipzig: Johann Bendler.

Lemeshevsky, K. V., 2009. The Nota Notae Rule in Kant’s Syllogistic. IKBFU’s Vestnik. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 6, pp. 39-45. (In Rus.)

Lu-Adler, Н., 2015. The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures Demonstrated by M. Immanuel Kant. In: J. Wuerth, 2015. The Cambridge Kant Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 543-545.

Lukanin, R. K., 1984. Organon Aristotelya [Aristotle’s Organon]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Rus.)

Mosser, K., 2004. Kant and the Logic of Aristotle. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Hawaii International Conference on the Arts and Humanities (Conference Paper). University of Dayton. [online] Available at: <https://ecommons.uday ton.edu/phl_fac_pub/22> [Accessed 02 April 2024].

Oizerman, T. I., 2001. Kant’s Doctrine of a Priori Knowledge. Kantian Journal, 1(22), pp. 3-29. (In Rus.)

Sirotkina, L. S., 2021. Epistemological Status of a Logical Procedure: Logical vs Cognitive? Tomsk State University Journal, 60, pp. 15-24. (In Rus.)

Tolley, Cl., 2006. Kant on the Nature of Logical Laws. Philosophical Topics, 34 (1-2), рр. 371-407. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics2006341/214

Vanzo, A. 2018. Kant’s False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures in Its Intellectual Context. In: M. Sgarbi and M. Cosci, 2018. The Aftermath of Syllogism. Aristotelian Logical Argument from Avicenna to Hegel. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 157-190.

Vatavu, М., 2019. Kant’s Innovative Theory of Judgement and Cognition in the False Subtlety of Syllogistic Figures. Kant-Studien, 110(4), рр. 527-553. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2019-4001

Wolff, Ch., 1770. Logic, or Reasonable Thoughts on the Powers of the Human Understanding and Their Use and Application in the Knowledge and Search of the Truth. Translated from the German of Baron Wolfius. London: Printed for L. Hawes, W. Clarke, and R. Collins.

Wilson, K. D., 1975. The Mistaken Simplicity of Kant’s Enthymematic Treatment of the Second and Third Figures. Kant-Studien, 66(4), рр. 404-417. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-1975-0171