Communication of Covid-19 consequences in the Baltic States inforsphere
This article seeks to describe the dynamics of Covid-19 in the Baltic States and to analyse the ways of communicating the threat and its consequences. Particular attention is paid to the media strategies pursued in the study area. The research is based on Russian and English texts from the Baltic media, WHO official documents and datasets, as well as initiatives of the Baltic Sea region organisations (2020) counteracting Covid-19. A combination of these sources builds up an objective view of the situation and demonstrates how the pandemic and its consequences are represented in public consciousness given a certain pragmatic goal. The pandemic is a new type of threat; its consequences demonstrate a tendency towards negative synergy and a category shift from soft threats to hard ones. The research shows that several key strategies — counter-active, projective, conservative, mobilising, resilient, and reflective — are used to communicate the threat and its consequences in the media.
1. Carpignano, A., Golia, E., Di Mauro, C., Bouchon, S., Nordvik, J -P. 2009, A methodological approach for the definition of multi-risk maps at regional level: first application, Journal of Risk Research, vol. 12, no. 3—4, p. 513—534. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903050269.
2. Linkov, I. et al. 2018, Tiered approach to resilience assessment, Risk Analysis, vol. 38, no. 9, p. 1772—1780. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12991.
3. Stepanova, V. V., Sivobrova, I. A., Nikolaev, A. V. 2014, Risk Factors Assessment Model in the Regional Operational Management System, GISAP: Economics, Jurisprudence and Management, no. 7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18007/gisap: ejm.v0i7.883.
4. Hanski, J., Keränen, J., Molarius, R. 2018, Tools and Methods for Supporting Regional Decision-Making in Relation to Climate Risks, Climate Change and Global Warming. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.80322.
5. Lupu, L. 2019, The concept of social risk: A geographical approach, Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 38, no. 4, p. 5—13, available at https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/quageo/38/4/article-p5.xml (accessed 01.08.2020).
6. Zabotkina V. I., Pozdnyakova E. M. 2020, Cognitive modeling of a conceptual domain sociocultural threats, Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka [Cognitive studies of language], no. 40, p. 51—65 (in Russ.).
7. Sokruta, E. Yu. 2018, The Narrative Characteristics of News Discourse in the Time of New Media, The New Philological Bulletin, no. 2 (45). doi: https://doi.org/10.24411/2072-9316-2018-00013.
8. Česnakas, G., Jakštaitė, G., Juozaitis, J. 2016, Assessment of political vulnerabilities on security of energy supply in the Baltic States, Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 153—182. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2016-0007.
9. Kretinin, G. V., Katrovskiy, A. P., Pototskaya, T. I., Fedorov, G. M. 2016, Geopolitical and geo-economic changes in the Baltic Sea Region at the turnoff the XX–XXI centuries, Balt. Reg., no. 4, p. 13—25. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2016-4-2.
10. Jönsson, A. M., Boström, M., Dreyer, M., Söderström, S. 2016, Risk Communication and the Role of the Public: Towards Inclusive Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea? Environmental Governance of the Baltic Sea, Springer, Cham, p. 205—227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27006-7_9.
11. Pynnöniemi, K. 2016, Salonius-Pasternak C. Security in the Baltic Sea Region: activation of risk potential, Finnish Institute of International Affairs, UPI Briefing Paper, available4 at: https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/security-in-the-baltic-sea-region-activation-of-r... (accessed 10.06.2020).
12. Boisot, M. H. 1995, Information Space: A framework for learning in organizations, institutions and culture, Routledge, London.
13. Mencher, M. 2011, News Reporting and Writing, NY, McGraw-Hill, 359 p.