Новый этап в развитии отечественной политической науки
- Страницы / Pages
- 161-166
Список литературы
1. Современная политическая наука: Методология / отв. ред. О. В. Гаман-Голутвина, А. И. Никитин. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М., 2019.
2. Beck N. Political Methodology: A Welcoming Discipline // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2000. Vol. 95, № 450. P. 651—654.
3. King G. On Political Methodology // Political Analysis. 1991. Vol. 2. P. 1—30. URL: https://gking. harvard. edu/files/gking/files/polmeth. pdf (дата обращения: 21.06.2019).
4. Achen C. Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART // Annual Review of Political Science. 2002. Vol. 5. P. 423—450.
5. King G., Keohane R. O., Verba S. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, 1994. URL: http://assets. press. princeton. edu/chapters/p5458.pdf (дата обращения: 20.06.2019).
6. Roberts M. E. What is Political Methodology? // PS: Political Science and Politics. 2018. Vol. 51, № 3. P. 597—601. doi:1017/S1049096518000537.
7. Hay C. Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. McMillan International Higher Education, 2002.
8. Гаман-Голутвина О. В. Политическая наука перед вызовами современной политики. К 60-летию САПН / РАПН // Полис. Политические исследования. 2016. № 1. С. 8—28. doi: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.01.02.
9. King G., Keohane R. O., Verba S. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, 1994. URL: http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/p5458.pdf (дата обращения: 20.06.2019).
10. Сравнительная политология: учебник / под ред. О. В. Гаман-Голутвиной. М., 2015.
11. Brady H. E., Collier D., Box-Steffensmeier J. M. Overview Of Political Methodology: Post-Behavioral Movements and Trends, 2011. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0048. URL: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.001.0001/oxfo rdhb-9780199604456-e-048 (дата обращения: 23.06.2019).
12. Glynn A. N., Ichino N. Using Qualitative Information to Improve Causal Inference // American Journal of Political Science. 2015. Vol. 59, № 4. P. 1055—1071.
13. Hollyer J. R., Rosendorff P. B., Vreeland J. R. Measuring Transparency // Political Analysis. 2014. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 413—434.
14. Mahoney J., Thelen K. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
15. Shames S. L., Wise T. Gender, Diversity, and Methods in Political Science: A Theory of Selection and Survival Biases // PS: Political Science & Politics. 2017. Vol. 50, № 3. P. 811—823.
16. Gaman-Golutvina O. Political Elites in the Commonwealth of Independent States: Recruitment and Rotation Tendencies // Comparative Sociology. 2007. Vol. 6, iss. 1—2. doi: https://doi. org/10.1163/156913307X208140.
17. Gaman-Golutvina O. The Changing Role of the State and State Bureaucracy in the Context of Public Administration Reforms: Russian and Foreign Experience // Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. 2008. Vol. 24, iss. 1. P. 37—53. doi.org/10.1080/13523270701840449.
18. Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science / Monroe K. R. (ed.). Yale University Press, 2005.
19. Miller A. H., Tien C., Peebler A. A. The American Political Science Review Hall of Fame: Assessments and Implications for an Evolving Discipline // PS: Political Science & Politics. 1996. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 73—83. doi: 10.2307/420198.
20. Thies C. G., Hogan R. E. The State of Undergraduate Research Methods Training in Political Science // PS: Political Science & Politics. 2005. Vol. 38, № 2. P. 293—297. doi: 10.1017/S1049096505056519.