Property Right and Expropriation in Proceedings of the European Court of Human Rights
- Pages
- 167-171
Abstract
This article analyses property right protection in the framework of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and gives the definition of property subject to protection from offences according to the Article 1 of the Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and frames the concept of expropriation and its types. The author focuses on the de facto expropriation phenomenon.
Reference
1. Iatridis v. Greece, ECtHR 1999-II.
2. Khamidov v. Russia ECtCH № 72118/01 (15.11.2007).
3. Lithgow v. United Kingdom, ECtHR, Ser. A № 107 (1986).
4. OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya YUKOS v. Russia, ECtHR, 29.01.2009.
5. Papamichalopoulos and others v. Greece, ECtHR, Ser. A № 260-В (24.06.1993).
6. Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, ECtCH, Ser. A № 52 (23.09.1982).
7. Stran Greek Refineries ans Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, ECtHR, Ser. A № 301 (1994).
8. Tre Traktörer AB v. Sweden, ECtHR, Ser. A № 159 (1989).
9. van Marle v. Netherlands, ECtHR, Ser. A № 101 (1986).
10. OECD Working Paper on international investment Number 2004/4, Indirect Expropriation and the «Right to Regulate» in International Law.
11. Dolzer R. Indirect Expropriations: new Developments// New York University Enviroment Law Journal. 2002. Vol. 11.
12. Flowein J. The protection of Property // The European System for the Protection of Human Rights. Dordrecht, 1993.
13. Reid K. A Practitioner’s guide to the European Convention on human rights. London, 1998.
14. Reinisch A. Expropriation, available at URL: https://www.ila-hq.org/pdf /Foreign%20Investment/ILA%20paper%20Reinisch. pdf.
15. Tietje C. Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht. Berlin, 2009.