Intonational means of expressing the "new" and the "given" categories in English, Russian and Spanish :: IKBFU's united scientific journal editorial office

×

Login
Password
Forgot your password?
Login As
You can log in if you are registered at one of these services:
   
The real and legitimate goal of the sciences is the endowment of human life with new inventions and riches
Francis Bacon

DOI-generator Search by DOI on Crossref.org

Intonational means of expressing the "new" and the "given" categories in English, Russian and Spanish

Author Makarova E. N.
Pages 59-66
Article Download
Keywords "given", "new", sentence nucleus, informational sentence structure
Abstract (summary) The article explores the intonation means of expressing the "given" and the "new" in English, Russian and Spanish. It represents the results of phonetic research proving the difference in the nucleus’s role when signaling the new information in three languages.
References 1. Николаева Т. М. Нерешенные вопросы теории актуального членения // Вопросы языкознания. 1972. № 2. С. 35—47.
2. Bolinger D. Intonation across languages // J. P. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, E. A. Moravcsik. Universals of human language. Phonology. Stanford, 1978. P. 471—524.
3. Chafe W. L. Integration and involvement in spoken and written language // Paper presented at the 2nd Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies. Vienna, 1979. P. 195—215.
4. Cruttenden A. Intonation. Cambridge, 1986.
5. German J., Pierrenhumbert J., Kaufmann S. Evidence for phonological constraints on nuclear accent placement // Language. 2006. Vol. 82, № 1. P. 151—168.
6. Gunter R. On the placement of accent in dialogue: A feature of context grammar // Journal of Linguistics. 1966. 2. P. 159—179.
7. Halliday M. A. K. Intonation and Grammar of British English. The Hague, 1967.
8. Halliday M. A. K., Hasan R. Cohesion in English. Longman, 1976.
9. Jurado M. A. Revision between differences between Nucleus Placement in English and Spanish // 4th International Conference on contrastive Linguistics. Compostela, 2005. P. 603—611.
10. Ladd D. R. The Structure of Intonational Meaning. Bloomington, 1980.
11. Levis J. M. Teaching Focus for Conversational use. 2001. 55(1). P. 47—54.
12. Riesco-Bernier S., Romero-Trillo J. The acoustics of ‘newness’ and its pragmatic implications in classroom discourse // Journal of Pragmatics. 2008. V. 40, Issue 6. P. 1103—1116.
13. Zubizarreta M. L. Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, 1998.

Back to the section