The humanities and social science

2020 Issue №1

Back to the list Download an article

Social and cultural determinants in the perception of environmental risks: Douglas grid group analysis



This research aims to determine the characteristics of the perception of environmental risks using the case of a salt deposit in the Kaliningrad region as an example. To achieve this aim, the author analyzed the social and cultural determinants of the population. The grid-group analysis was used as a sup­porting technique for the identification of cultural determinants. The follow­ing cultural determinants were identified: individualism, hierarchism, fatal­ism and egalitarianism. Social determinants were factors related to the re­spondents' living environment — urban or rural. The main method of re­search was a focus group with subsequent processing of results using ATLAS.ti software programme. The study revealed that environmental risks are not a priority problem for the region. Rural residents are more concerned about en­vironmental risks. There are similarities in the assessments of environmen­tal conditions by urban and rural residents. However, the author identified some differences particularly regarding the development of the salt deposit. These differences can be explained by different cultural types: a negative atti­tude prevails among individualists and egalitarians, a contrasting position prevails among hierarchs. It has been established that there are socially deter­mined forms of communication regarding overcoming environmental risks, for in­stance, word of mouth and appeals to government institutions (villag­ers) and street protests (city residents). There are also differences in the choice of effec­tive methods of risk communication, depending on the respondent’s cultural type. Hierarchs prefer communication in social networks; egalitarians tend to organize petitions and appeal to the authorities; the fatalists do not ex­press their own opinion; individuals strive for greater control over the situa­tion and therefore prefer all possible forms of interaction.


1.   Власти региона рассчитывают на 2 млрд рублей ежегодно от калийного руд­ника в Нивенском // Новый Калининград. URL: https://www.newkaliningrad. ru/news/briefs/economy/21695309-vlasti-regiona-rasschityvayut-na-2-mlrd-rub- ezhegodno-ot-kaliynogo-rudnika-v-nivenskom.html (дата обращения: 26.11.2019).

2.   Левченко А. В., Мачанските Ю. Р., Шушлебина А. Ю. Особенности представ­ления экологических рисков в СМИ (на примере месторождения калийных солей в поселке Нивенское) // Вестник Балтийского федерального университе­та им. И. Канта. Сер. Естественные и медицинские науки. 2017. № 1. С. 42—57.

3.   Майтакова О. «Нас хотят похоронить»: жители Нивенского готовы пере­крыть дорогу в Польшу // Новый Калининград. URL: https://www.newkalinin tovy-perekryt-dorogu-v-polshu.html (дата обращения: 26.11.2019).

4.   Путин запросил полную информацию по строительству калийного руд­ника в Нивенском // Калининград.ru. URL: 66054-putin-zaprosil-polnuyu-informaciyu-po-stroitelstvu-kalijnogo-rudnika-v-niven skom (дата обращения: 26.11.2019).

5.   «Эксклав в квадрате»: что происходит в поселке Нивенское после письма главе Чечни // Калининград.ru. URL: jeksklav-v-kvadrate-chto-proishodit-v-posjolke-nivenskoe-posle-pisma-glave-chechni (дата обращения: 26.11.2019).

6.   ATLAS.ti 8 Windows : user manual. 2017. URL: http://downloads.atlasti. com/docs/manual/atlasti_v8_manual_en.pdf (дата обращения: 15.11.2019).

7.   Dake K. Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk // Jour­nal of Social Issues. 1992. Vol. 48, № 4. P. 21—37.

8.   Douglas M. Cultural Bias // Douglas M. In the Active Voice. L., 1982.

9.   Ilyashevich A. V. Risk Communication in the Sphere of Environmental Risk: Power Structures and Citizens // Regional Risks and Risks to the Regions : Confe­rence Proceedings. Vilnius, 2018. P. 68—71.

10.   Mamadouh V. Grid-Group Cultural Theory: an Introduction // GeoJournal. 1999. Vol. 47, № 3. P. 395—409.