IKBFU's Vestnik

2019 Issue №04

Back to the list Download an article

Modern indicators of urban development: challenges and op­portunities for creating integral approaches to city management

Pages
40-51

Abstract

There is an increasing need for the assessment of urban development rates in the world. In modern Russia, this need is reaffirmed by the transfor­mation of regional economies, the economic acceleration of many major cities, and by the active introduction of strategic management tools (KPI, etc.). The article anal­yses the current indexes and rankings of urban development. The author ex­plored the main methodological approaches to the assessment of the rate of urban development. One of the topical issues of contemporary research on this subject in Russia is an attempt to create comprehensive methods of as­sessing urban de­velopment without taking into account the specifics of urban management and the scale of regional economy. In this regard, the paper pro­vides a critical analy­sis of approaches to urban development indicators, index­es and rankings. The author drew conclusions about the most optimal ap­proaches towards the for­mation and use of data in city management in Russia. The author used gen­eral scientific research methods (logical and structural analysis and the meth­od of generalization), and statistical analysis (grouping, comparison and gen­eralization). The results of the study include recommen­dations for city data management and for decision-making in knowledge man­agement.

Reference

1. Бауман З. Текучая современность. СПб., 2008.

2. Бек У. Общество риска. На пути к другому модерну. М., 2000.

3. Битюкова В. Р. Интегральная оценка экологической ситуации городов России // Региональные исследования. 2014. № 4. С. 49—57.

4. Бондарская Т. А. Методика расчета интегрального показателя развития че­ловеческого капитала для формирования креативной среды // Социально-эко­номические явления и процессы. 2015. Т. 10, № 9. С. 12—17.

5. Валлерстайн И. После либерализма. М., 2003.

6. Долгих Е. И., Антонов Е. В. Рейтинг устойчивого развития городов России // Урбанистика и рынок недвижимости. 2015. № 1. С. 17—32.

7. Никифоров А. А. Траектории городской протестной повестки в современ­ной России // Город. Среда. Политика. 2018 : сб. матер. науч.-практ. конф. СПб., 2019. С. 20—24.

8. Озерова О. Ю. Интегральный индекс качества жизни населения региона // Вопросы территориального развития. 2015. № 1 (21). С. 1—10.

9. Kearney A. T. 2019 Global Cities Report. URL: https://www.atkearney.com/ global-cities/ (дата обращения: 10.08.2019).

10. Button K. City management and urban environmental indicators // Ecologi­cal economics. 2002. Vol. 40, № 2. P. 231—232.

11. Economist Intelligence Unit. Hot spots 2025: Benchmarking the future competi­tiveness of cities. London: The Economist, 2013. URL: https://www.citigroup.com/ citi/news/2013/130604a.pdf (дата обращения: 10.08.2019).

12. Erkkilä T., Piironen O. Rankings and Global Knowledge Governance. Cham, 2018.

13. Florida R. The 25 most economically powerful cities in the world // Innova­tion. 2011. Vol. 992, № 984. URL: https://www.citylab.com/life/2011/09/25-most- economically-powerful-cities-world/109/ (дата обращения: 10.08.2019).

14. Global Power City Index 2018. URL: http://mori-m-foundation.or.jp/pdf/ GPCI2018_summary.pdf (дата обращения: 10.08.2019).

15. Global Warming of 1.5 °C. IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission path­ways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate chan­ge, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. URL: http://www. ipcc.ch/pdf/session48/pr_181008_P48_spm_ru.pdf (дата обращения: 10.08.2019).

16. Habitat U. N. The city prosperity initiative: 2015 global city report, 2015. URL: http://cpi.unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/resources/CPI_2015%20Global%20City %20Report._0.pdf (дата обращения: 10.08.2019).

17. Kitchin R., Lauriault T. P., McArdle G. Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards // Regional Studies, Regional Science. 2015. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 6—28.

18. Knight Frank Research. Prime Global Cities Index — Q1 2019. URL: https:// www.knightfrank.com/news/knight-frank-launches-prime-global-cities-index-011917. aspx (дата обращения: 10.08.2019).

19. MERCER. The Mercer Quality of Living Survey. New York, 2015. URL: https:// www.mercer.com/newsroom/2019-quality-of-living-survey.html (дата обращения: 10.08.2019).

20. Sarimin M., Yigitcanlar T. Towards a comprehensive and integrated knowled­ge-based urban development model: status quo and directions // International Jour­nal of Knowledge-Based Development. 2012. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 175—192.

21. Sassen S. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ, 2001.

22. Taylor P. Measuring the world city network: New results and developments // GaWC Research Bulletin 300. URL: https://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb300.html (дата обращения: 10.08.2019).

23. United Nations. World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision. N. Y., 2015.

24. Van Winden W., Van den Berg, L., Pol P. European cities in the knowledge economy: towards a typology // Urban Studies. 2007. Vol. 44, № 3. P. 525—550.

25. Wong C. A framework for ‘City Prosperity Index’: linking indicators, analysis and policy // Habitat International. 2015. Vol. 45. P. 3—9.

26. Yigitcanlar T. Position paper: benchmarking the performance of global and emerging knowledge cities // Expert Systems with Applications. 2014. Vol. 41, № 12. P. 5549—5559.

27. Yigitcanlar T., Velibeyoglu K., Martinez-Fernandez C. Rising knowledge cities: the role of knowledge precincts // Journal of Knowledge Management. 2008. Vol. 12 (5). P. 8—20.