IKBFU's Vestnik

2019 Issue №01

Back to the list Download an article

An “ideal city”, its statics and dynamics



The article develops an ‘ideal city’ theme and focuses on the relationships of its statics and dynamics in a mobile local-global context. The author offers the defini­tions of these two notions under historical and modern conditions, and determines the specificity of the ‘ideal city’ as a complex socio-biotechnical system both dependent on the scale of it (local, na­tional, global) and its posi­tion within the dynamic global whole. Then, the ideal city notion is analyzed in two aspects: as a channel of presentation of a model of future living envi­ronment, and as a form of its application to the goal of making (constructing) of quality model of Russian megalopolises safe and comfortable for its inhabit­ants and visitors. In any case, the harm produced by their social systems to the biosphere has to be minimal. It means that the meg­alopolises should simul­taneously be well supplied with their own renewable resources and to be well supplied with resources coming from the outside. The megalopolis inhabitants have to be well informed about the inside and outside metabolic processes. In conclusion the author claims the necessity of an inter­disci­plinary approach to designing and constructing an ‘ideal city’ model in Russia and everywhere. Such interdisciplinary research and development teams of the research­ers, tu­tors, students, journalists, grassroots activists and municipal workers have to be formed. It is stated that a practical realization of any ‘ideal city’ project is neither a ‘social project’ in a traditional sense, nor a set of indices that have to be followed. An ‘ideal city’ project is a model of un­interrupted process of transformation of so­cial, material, informational and other interrelated com­ponents of such city mobile whole.


1. Вернадский В. И. Публицистические статьи / отв. ред. В. П. Волков. М., 1995.

2. Гуманистический поворот: императив человеческой цивилизации / отв. ред. С. А. Кравченко. М., 2018.

3. Зборовский Г. Е., Амбарова П. А. Университеты, которые могут изме­нить се­бя и макрорегион // Россия реформирующаяся : ежегодник. Вып. 16. М., 2018. С. 393—436.

4. Материалы XIV экологической науч.-практ. конф. школьников Южного Подмосковья «Экополис — город будущего» (тезисы в авторской редакции) / под ред. Л. А. Кочуровой. Пущино, 2012.

5. Ходаков И. Свобода заговора // Военно-промышленный курьер. 2018. № 49 (762).

6. Яницкий О. Н. Глобализация: от теории к измерению // Россия реформи­рующаяся : ежегодник. Вып. 16. М., 2018. С. 145—170.

7. Яницкий О. Н. Российские мегаполисы в условиях глобальных со­циально-экологических вызовов // Общественные науки и современ­ность. 2018. № 1. С. 5—16.

8. Яницкий О. Н. Социобиотехнические системы: новый взгляд на взаимо­действие человека и природы // Социологическая наука и со­циальная практи­ка. 2016. № 3. С. 5—22.

9. Bauman Z. Wasted Lives. Modernity and its Outcasts. Cambridge, 2004.

10. Howard E. The Garden Cities of Tomorrow. L., 1965.

11. Kaldor M. New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cam­bridge, 2012.

12. Niemeyer O. Minha expêriencia em Brasίlia. Rio de Janeiro, 2006.

13. Park R. Migration and the Marginal Man // American Journal of So­ciology. 1928. Vol. 33. Р. 882—893.

14. Park R. E., Burgess E. W., McKenzie R. D., Wirth L. The City. Chicago, 1926.

15. Social ecology: society-nature relations across time and space / еd. by H. Ha­berl, M. Fisher-Kowalski, F. Krausmann and V. Winiwater. Spring­er, 2016.

16. The Global Risks Report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum. URL: www. weforum.org/risks (дата обращения: 10.02.2019).

17. Yanitsky O. N. The Fourth Scientific and Technological Revolution and its So­cial Out