On the illocutionary “responsibility” of the author in a dramatic paratext
- Pages
- 38-44
Abstract
This article deals with the heterogeneity of author's illocutionary intentions in the process of creating a dramatic paratext. It is suggested that the pragmatic orientation of typologically different paratextual structures can be purely directive (prescriptive) as well as narrative, which emphasizes the transgenre character of paratext. The article addresses the specific features of implementation of the extradiegetic author category in drama on a paratextual level, as well as its role in the creation of dramatic diegesis.
Reference
1. Гротовски Е. От Бедного Театра к искусству-Проводнику. М., 2003.
2. Женетт Ж. Фигуры : в 2 т. М.,1998. Т. 2.
3. Серль Дж. Р. Логический статус художественного дискурса. URL: http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/1999_03/1999_3_04.htm (дата обращения: 20.05.2014).
4. Хализев В. Е. Драма как явление искусства. М., 1978.
5. Dictionnaire encyclopédique du théâtre. P., 1991.
6. Anouilh J. Antigone // Théâtre français d’aujourd’hui. M., 1969. P. 37—89.
7. Anouilh J. L’Alouette // Ibid. P. 339—438.
8. Salcrou A. L’Archipel Lenoir ou il ne faut pas toucher aux choses immobiles //Ibid. P. 157—247.
9. Giraudoux J. La Folle de Chaillot // Oeuvres choisis. M., 1980. P. 321—408.
10. Sartre J.-P. Morts sans sépulture // Théâtre français d’aujourd’hui. M., 1969.P. 91—155.
11. Beaumarchais P.-Au. Le Mariage de Figaro // Le Barbier de Séville. Le Mariage de Figaro. M., 1979. P. 159—276.