Fort №5 in the historical memory of Kaliningrad residents
... of the Regional Museum of History and Art. The conclusion is made about the principles of reconstruction and the limits of what is admissible in the process of adjusting the German monuments to the objectives of the memory policy aimed at filling the historic landscape of the city with the Soviet attributes. The conclusion substantiates the key role of the memorial opened at Fort № 5 as a mediator (media) between the past of the region and the inhabitants of the region to promote the historical narrative about the storming of Königsberg by the Red Army as the central event of the East Prussian operation ...
Some methodological problems of military and historical anthropology
... Ленинграде в 1941—1942 гг. СПб., 2011.
11. Brown N. Life against death. L., 1959.
12. Kennedy R. Psychoanalysis, History, and Subjectivity. Now of the past. Hove, 2002.
13. Kirschenbaum L. The legacy of the siege of Leningrad, 1941—95: Myth, memories,and monuments. Cambridge, 2006.
Gazieva L.
military anthropology, historical psychology, historical memory, psychohistory
118-124
Military and political cooperation between Germany and Lithuania in the late 2010s to early 2020s
... who were predominantly German-speaking. The first trend underscored Lithuania’s close dependence on the fluctuations in power across Belarusian, Ukrainian (Little Russian), and Russian territories, which formed part of the Lithuanian Principality. Historic memories of wars have influenced contemporary German-Lithuanian relations [20], though to a lesser degree compared to the dialogue between Germany and Poland. This disparity can be attributed to historical factors. From the 16th to the early 20th centuries,...
